{"rowid": 144, "title": "The Mobile Web, Simplified", "contents": "A note from the editors: although eye-opening in 2006, this article is no longer relevant to today\u2019s mobile web.\n \n \n \n Considering a foray into mobile web development? Following are four things you need to know before making the leap.\n\n1. 4 billion mobile subscribers expected by 2010\n\nFancy that. Coupled with the UN prediction of 6.8 billion humans by 2010, 4 billion mobile subscribers (source) is an astounding 59% of the planet. Just how many of those subscribers will have data plans and web-enabled phones is still in question, but inevitably this all means one thing for you and me: A ton of potential eyes to view our web content on a mobile device.\n\n2. Context is king\n\nYour content is of little value to users if it ignores the context in which it is viewed. Consider how you access data on your mobile device. You might be holding a bottle of water or gripping a handle on the subway/tube. You\u2019re probably seeking specific data such as directions or show times, rather than the plethora of data at your disposal via a desktop PC.\n\nThe mobile web, a phrase often used to indicate \u201caccessing the web on a mobile device\u201d, is very much a context-, content-, and component-specific environment. Expressed in terms of your potential target audience, access to web content on a mobile device is largely influenced by surrounding circumstances and conditions, information relevant to being mobile, and the feature set of the device being used. Ask yourself, What is relevant to my users and the tasks, problems, and needs they may encounter while being mobile? Answer that question and you\u2019ll be off to a great start.\n\n3. WAP 2.0 is an XHTML environment\n\nIn a nutshell, here are a few fundamental tenets of mobile internet technology:\n\n\n\tWireless Application Protocol (WAP) is the protocol for enabling mobile access to internet content.\n\tWireless Markup Language (WML) was the language of choice for WAP 1.0.\n\tNearly all devices sold today are WAP 2.0 devices.\n\tWith the introduction of WAP 2.0, XHTML Mobile Profile (XHTML-MP) became the preferred markup language.\n\tXHTML-MP will be familiar to anyone experienced with XHTML Transitional or Strict.\n\n\nSummary? The mobile web is rapidly becoming an XHTML environment, and thus you and I can apply our existing \u201cdesktop web\u201d skills to understand how to develop content for it. With WML on the decline, the learning curve is much smaller today than it was several years ago. I\u2019m generalizing things gratuitously, but the point remains: Get off yo\u2019 lazy butt and begin to take mobile seriously.\n\nI\u2019ll even pass you a few tips for getting started. First, the DOCTYPE for XHTML-MP is as follows:\n\n\n\nAs for MIME type, Open Mobile Alliance (OMA) specifies using the MIME type application/vnd.wap.xhtml+xml, but ultimately you need to ensure the server delivering your mobile content is configured properly for the MIME type you choose to use, as there are other options (see Setting up WAP Servers).\n\nOnce you\u2019ve made it to the body, the XHTML-MP markup is not unlike what you\u2019re already used to. A few resources worth skimming:\n\n\n\tDevelopers Home XHTML-MP Tutorial \u2013 An impressively replete resource for all things XHTML-MP\n\tXHTML-MP Tags List \u2013 A complete list of XHTML-MP elements and accompanying attributes\n\n\nAnd last but certainly not least, CSS. There exists WAP CSS, which is essentially a subset of CSS2 with WAP-specific extensions. For all intents and purposes, much of the CSS you\u2019re already comfortable using will be transferrable to mobile. As for including CSS in your pages, your options are the same as for desktop sites: external, embedded, and inline. Some experts will argue embedded or inline over external in favor of reducing the number of HTTP connections per page request, yet many popular mobilized sites and apps employ external linking without issue.\n\nStocking stuffers: Flickr Mobile, Fandango Mobile, and Popurls Mobile. A few sites with whom you can do the View Source song and dance for further study.\n\n4. \u201cCell phone\u201d is so DynaTAC\n\nIf you\u2019re a U.S. resident, listen up: You must rid your vocabulary of the term \u201ccell phone\u201d. We\u2019re one of the few economies on the planet to refer to a mobile phone accordingly. If you care to find yourself in any of the worthwhile mobile development circles, begin using terms more widely accepted: \u201cmobile\u201d or \u201cmobile phone\u201d or \u201chandset\u201d or \u201chandy\u201d. If you\u2019re not sure which, go for \u201cmobile\u201d. Such as, \u201cYo dog, check out my new mobile.\u201d\n\nMore importantly, however, is overcoming the mentality that access to the mobile web can be done only with a phone. Instead, \u201cdevice\u201d encourages us to think phone, handheld computer, watch, Nintendo DS, car, you name it.\n\nSimple enough?", "year": "2006", "author": "Cameron Moll", "author_slug": "cameronmoll", "published": "2006-12-19T00:00:00+00:00", "url": "https://24ways.org/2006/the-mobile-web-simplified/", "topic": "ux"} {"rowid": 143, "title": "Marking Up a Tag Cloud", "contents": "Everyone\u2019s doing it. \n\nThe problem is, everyone\u2019s doing it wrong. \n\nHarsh words, you might think. But the crimes against decent markup are legion in this area. You see, I\u2019m something of a markup and semantics junkie. So I\u2019m going to analyse some of the more well-known tag clouds on the internet, explain what\u2019s wrong, and then show you one way to do it better. \n\ndel.icio.us \n\nI think the first ever tag cloud I saw was on del.icio.us. Here\u2019s how they mark it up. \n\n
\n\t.net\n\tadvertising\n\tajax\n\t...\n
\n\nUnfortunately, that is one of the worst examples of tag cloud markup I have ever seen. The page states that a tag cloud is a list of tags where size reflects popularity. However, despite describing it in this way to the human readers, the page\u2019s author hasn\u2019t described it that way in the markup. It isn\u2019t a list of tags, just a bunch of anchors in a
. This is also inaccessible because a screenreader will not pause between adjacent links, and in some configurations will not announce the individual links, but rather all of the tags will be read as just one link containing a whole bunch of words. Markup crime number one. \n\nFlickr \n\nAh, Flickr. The darling photo sharing site of the internet, and the biggest blind spot in every standardista\u2019s vision. Forgive it for having atrocious markup and sometimes confusing UI because it\u2019s just so much damn fun to use. Let\u2019s see what they do. \n\n

\n\t\u00a006\u00a0\n\t\u00a0africa\u00a0\n\t\u00a0amsterdam\u00a0\n\t...\n

\n\nAgain we have a simple collection of anchors like del.icio.us, only this time in a paragraph. But rather than using a class to represent the size of the tag they use an inline style. An inline style using a pixel-based font size. That\u2019s so far away from the goal of separating style from content, they might as well use a tag. You could theoretically parse that to extract the information, but you have more work to guess what the pixel sizes represent. Markup crime number two (and extra jail time for using non-breaking spaces purely for visual spacing purposes.)\n\nTechnorati \n\nAh, now. Here, you\u2019d expect something decent. After all, the Overlord of microformats and King of Semantics Tantek \u00c7elik works there. Surely we\u2019ll see something decent here? \n\n
    \n\t
  1. Britney Spears
  2. \n\t
  3. Bush
  4. \n\t
  5. Christmas
  6. \n\t...\n\t
  7. SEO
  8. \n\t
  9. Shopping
  10. \n\t...\n
\n\nUnfortunately it turns out not to be that decent, and stop calling me Shirley. It\u2019s not exactly terrible code. It does recognise that a tag cloud is a list of links. And, since they\u2019re in alphabetical order, that it\u2019s an ordered list of links. That\u2019s nice. However \u2026 fifteen nested tags? FIFTEEN? That\u2019s emphasis for you. Yes, it is parse-able, but it\u2019s also something of a strange way of looking at emphasis. The HTML spec states that is emphasis, and is for stronger emphasis. Nesting tags seems counter to the idea that different tags are used for different levels of emphasis. Plus, if you had a screen reader that stressed the voice for emphasis, what would it do? Shout at you? Markup crime number three. \n\nSo what should it be? \n\nAs del.icio.us tells us, a tag cloud is a list of tags where the size that they are rendered at contains extra information. However, by hiding the extra context purely within the CSS or the HTML tags used, you are denying that context to some users. The basic assumption being made is that all users will be able to see the difference between font sizes, and this is demonstrably false. \n\nA better way to code a tag cloud is to put the context of the cloud within the content, not the markup or CSS alone. As an example, I\u2019m going to take some of my favourite flickr tags and put them into a cloud which communicates the relative frequency of each tag. \n\nTo start with a tag cloud in its most basic form is just a list of links. I am going to present them in alphabetical order, so I\u2019ll use an ordered list. Into each list item I add the number of photos I have with that particular tag. The tag itself is linked to the page on flickr which contains those photos. So we end up with this first example. To display this as a traditional tag cloud, we need to alter it in a few ways: \n\n\n\tThe items need to be displayed next to each other, rather than one-per-line\n\tThe context information should be hidden from display (but not from screen readers)\n\tThe tag should link to the page of items with that tag\n\n\nDisplaying the items next to each other simply means setting the display of the list elements to inline. The context can be hidden by wrapping it in a and then using the off-left method to hide it. And the link just means adding an anchor (with rel=\"tag\" for some extra microformats bonus points). So, now we have a simple collection of links in our second example. \n\nThe last stage is to add the sizes. Since we already have context in our content, the size is purely for visual rendering, so we can just use classes to define the different sizes. For my example, I\u2019ll use a range of class names from not-popular through ultra-popular, in order of smallest to largest, and then use CSS to define different font sizes. If you preferred, you could always use less verbose class names such as size1 through size6. Anyway, adding some classes and CSS gives us our final example, a semantic and more accessible tag cloud.", "year": "2006", "author": "Mark Norman Francis", "author_slug": "marknormanfrancis", "published": "2006-12-09T00:00:00+00:00", "url": "https://24ways.org/2006/marking-up-a-tag-cloud/", "topic": "code"} {"rowid": 142, "title": "Revealing Relationships Can Be Good Form", "contents": "A few days ago, a colleague of mine \u2013 someone I have known for several years, who has been doing web design for several years and harks back from the early days of ZDNet \u2013 was running through a prototype I had put together for some user testing. As with a lot of prototypes, there was an element of \u2018smoke and mirrors\u2019 to make things look like they were working. \n\nOne part of the form included a yes/no radio button, and selecting the Yes option would, in the real and final version of the form, reveal some extra content. Rather than put too much JavaScript in the prototype, I took a preverbial shortcut and created a link which I wrapped around the text next to the radio button \u2013 clicking on that link would cause the form to mimic a change event on the radio button. But it wasn\u2019t working for him. \n\nWhy was that? Because whereas I created the form using a