{"rowid": 190, "title": "Self-Testing Pages with JavaScript", "contents": "Working at an agency I am involved more and more on projects in which client side code is developed internally then sent out to a separate team for implementation. You provide static HTML, CSS and JavaScript which then get placed into the CMS and brought to life as an actual website. As you can imagine this can sometimes lead to frustrations. However many safeguards you include, handing over your code to someone else is always a difficult thing to do effectively.\n\nIn this article I will show you how you can create a JavaScript implementation checker and that will give you more time for drink based activity as your web site and apps are launched quicker and with less unwanted drama!\n\nAn all too frequent occurrence\n\nYou\u2019ve been working on a project for weeks, fixed all your bugs and send it to be implemented. You hear nothing and assume all is going well then a few days before it\u2019s meant to launch you get an email from the implementation team informing you of bugs in your code that you need to urgently fix.\n\n The 24ways website with a misspelt ID for the years menu\n\nBeing paranoid you trawl through the preview URL, check they have the latest files, check your code for errors then notice that a required HTML attribute has been omitted from the build and therefore CSS or JavaScript you\u2019ve hooked onto that particular attribute isn\u2019t being applied and that\u2019s what is causing the \u201cbug\u201d.\n\nIt takes you seconds drafting an email informing them of this, it takes then seconds putting the required attribute in and low and behold the bug is fixed, everyone is happy but you\u2019ve lost a good few hours of your life \u2013 this time could have been better spent in the pub.\n\nI\u2019m going to show you a way that these kind of errors can be alerted immediately during implementation of your code and ensure that when you are contacted you know that there actually is a bug to fix. You probably already know the things that could be omitted from a build and look like bugs so you\u2019ll soon be creating tests to look for these and alert when they are not found on the rendered page. The error is reported directly to those who need to know about it and fix it. Less errant bug reports and less frantic emails ahoy!\n\n A page with an implementation issue and instant feedback on the problem\n\nJavaScript selector engines to the rescue\n\nWhether you\u2019re using a library or indeed tapping into the loveliness of the new JavaScript Selector APIs looking for particular HTML elements in JavaScript is fairly trivial now. \n\nFor instance this is how you look for a div element with the id attribute of year (the missing attribute from top image) using jQuery (the library I\u2019ll be coding my examples in): \n\nif ($(\u2018div#year\u2019).length) {\n\talert(\u2018win\u2019);\n}\n\nUsing this logic you can probably imagine how you can write up a quick method to check for the existence of a particular element and alert when it\u2019s not present \u2014 but assuming you have a complex page you\u2019re going to be repeating yourself a fair bit and we don\u2019t want to be doing that.\n\nTest scripts\n\nIf you\u2019ve got a lot of complex HTML patterns that need testing across a number of different pages it makes sense to keep your tests out of production code. Chances are you\u2019ve already got a load of heavy JavaScript assets, and when it comes to file size saving every little helps.\n\nI don\u2019t think that tests should contain code inside of them so keep mine externally as JSON. This also means that you can use the one set of tests in multiple places. We already know that it\u2019s a good idea to keep our CSS and JavaScript separate so lets continue along those lines here.\n\nThe test script for this example looks like this:\n\n{\n\t\"title\": \"JS tabs implementation test\",\n\t\"description\": \"Check that the correct HTML patterns has been used\",\n\t\"author\": \"Ross Bruniges\",\n\t\"created\": \"20th July 2009\",\n\t\"tests\": [\n\t\t{\n\t\t\t\"name\": \"JS tabs elements\",\n\t\t\t\"description\": \"Checking that correct HTML elements including class/IDs are used on the page for the JS to progressively enhance\",\n\t\t\t\"selector\": \"div.tabbed_content\",\n\t\t\t\"message\": \"We couldn't find VAR on the page - it's required for our JavaScript to function correctly\",\n\t\t\t\"check_for\": {\n\t\t\t\t\"contains\": {\n\t\t\t\t\t\"elements\": [\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\"div.tab_content\", \"h2\" \n\t\t\t\t\t],\n\t\t\t\t\t\"message\": \"We've noticed some missing HTML:
please refer to the examples sent for reference\" \n\t\t\t\t} \n\t\t\t} \n\t\t} \n\t]\n}\n\nThe first four lines are just a little bit of meta data so we remember what this test was all about when we look at it again in the future, or indeed if it ever breaks. The tests are the really cool parts and firstly you\u2019ll notice that it\u2019s an array \u2013 we\u2019re only going to show one example test here but there is no reason why you can\u2019t place in as many as you want. I\u2019ll explain what each of the lines in the example test means:\n\n\n\tname \u2013 short test name, I use this in pass/fail messaging later\n\tdescription \u2013 meta data for future reference\n\tselector \u2013 the root HTML element from which your HTML will be searched\n\tmessage \u2013 what the app will alert if the initial selector isn\u2019t found\n\tcheck_for \u2013 a wrapper to hold inner tests \u2013 those run if the initial selector does match\n\t\n\t\tcontains \u2013 the type of check, we\u2019re checking that the selector contains specified elements\n\t\t\n\t\t\telements \u2013 the HTML elements we are searching for\n\t\t\tmessage \u2013 a message for when these don\u2019t match (VAR is substituted when it\u2019s appended to the page with the name of any elements that don\u2019t exist)\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\nIt\u2019s very important to pass the function valid JSON (JSONLint is a great tool for this) otherwise you might get a console showing no tests have even been run. \n\nThe JavaScript that makes this helpful\n\nAgain, this code should never hit a production server so I\u2019ve kept it external. This also means that the only thing that\u2019s needed to be done by the implementation team when they are ready to build is that they delete this code.\n\n\n\n\n\u201cView the full JavaScript:/examples/self-testing-pages-with-javascript/js/tests/test_suite.js\n\nThe init function appends the test console to the page and inserts the CSS file required to style it (you don\u2019t need to use pictures of me when tests pass and fail though I see no reason why you shouldn\u2019t), goes and grabs the JSON file referenced and parses it. The methods to pass (tests_pass) and fail (haz_fail) the test I hope are pretty self-explanatory as is the one which creates the test summary once everything has been run (create_summary).\n\nThe two interesting functions are init_tests and confirm_html.\n\ninit_tests\n\ninit_tests:function(i,obj) {\n\tvar $master_elm = $(obj.selector);\n\tsleuth.test_page.$logger.append(\"
\");\n\tvar $container = $('#test_' + i);\n\tif (!$master_elm.length) {\n\t\tvar err_sum = obj.message.replace(/VAR/gi, obj.selector);\n\t\tsleuth.test_page.haz_failed(err_sum, $container);\n\t\treturn;\n\t}\n\tif (obj.check_for) {\n\t\t$.each(obj.check_for,function(key, value){\n\t\t\tsleuth.test_page.assign_checks($master_elm, $container, key, value);\n\t\t});\n\t} else {\n\t\tsleuth.test_page.tests_passed($container);\n\t\treturn;\n\t}\n}\n\nThe function gets sent the number of the current iteration (used to create a unique id for its test summary) and the current object that contains the data we\u2019re testing against as parameters.\n\nWe grab a reference to the root element and this is used (pretty much in the example shown right at the start of this article) and its length is checked. If the length is positive we know we can continue to the inner tests (if they exist) but if not we fail the test and don\u2019t go any further. We append the error to the test console for everyone to see.\n\nIf we pass the initial check we send the reference to the root element, message contains and the inner object to a function that in this example sends us on to confirm_html (if we had a more complex test suite it would do a lot more). \n\nconfirm_html\n\nconfirm_html:function(target_selector, error_elm, obj) {\n\tvar missing_elms = [];\n\t$.each(obj.elements, function(i, val) {\n\t\tif (!target_selector.find(val).length) {\n\t\t\tmissing_elms.push(val);\n\t\t}\t\n\t});\n\tif (missing_elms.length) {\n\t\tvar file_list = missing_elms.join('Name | \n\t\t\tCards sent | \n\t\t\tCards received | \n\t\t\tCards written but not sent | \n\t\t
---|---|---|---|
Ann | \n\t\t\t40 | \n\t\t\t28 | \n\t\t\t4 | \n\t\t
Joe | \n\t\t\t2 | \n\t\t\t27 | \n\t\t\t29 | \n\t\t
Paul | \n\t\t\t5 | \n\t\t\t35 | \n\t\t\t2 | \n\t\t
Louise | \n\t\t\t65 | \n\t\t\t65 | \n\t\t\t0 | \n\t\t
The buck stops here.
\n\nFor longer quotes, the blockquote element might be more appropriate. In a conversation, where the order matters, I think an ordered list would make a good containing element for this pattern:\n\nI think Eve is watching.
This isn't a cryptography tutorial ...we're in the wrong example!
Please wait while we do what we do best.
\n\nLooks semantic enough to me! Here\u2019s the basic HTML I\u2019m using to position the element in the center of the screen, and make the text inside it disappear:\n\n#spinner {\n\tposition: absolute;\n\ttop: 50%;\n\tleft: 50%;\n\tmargin: -100px 0 0 -100px;\n\theight: 200px;\n\twidth: 200px;\n\ttext-indent: 250px;\n\twhite-space: nowrap;\n\toverflow: hidden;\n}\n\nCool, but now we don\u2019t see anything. Let\u2019s pull rabbit number one out of the hat: -webkit-mask-image (accompanied by the previously mentioned transparent PNG image):\n\n#spinner {\n\t...\n\t-webkit-mask-image: url(../img/spinner.png);\n}\n\nBy now you should be feeling like a magician already. Oh, wait, we still have a blank screen, looks like we left something in the hat (tip: not rabbit droppings):\n\n#spinner {\n\t...\n\t-webkit-mask-image: url(../img/spinner.png);\n\tbackground-color: #000;\n}\n\nNice! What we\u2019ve done right here is telling the element to clip onto the PNG. It\u2019s a lot like clipping layers in Photoshop. So, spinners, they move, right? Into the hat again, and look what we pull out this time: CSS animations!\n\n#spinner {\n\t...\n\t-webkit-mask-image: url(../img/spinner.png);\n\tbackground-color: #000;\n\t-webkit-animation-name: spinnerRotate;\n\t-webkit-animation-duration: 2s;\n\t-webkit-animation-iteration-count: infinite;\n\t-webkit-animation-timing-function: linear;\n}\n\nSome explanation:\n\n\n\t-webkit-animation-name: Name of the animation we\u2019ll be defining later.\n\t-webkit-animation-duration: The timespan of the animation.\n\t-webkit-animation-iteration-count: Repeat once, a defined number of times or infinitely?\n\t-webkit-animation-timing-function: Linear is the one you\u2019ll be using mostly. Other options are ease-in, ease-out, ease-in-out\u2026\n\n\nLet\u2019s define spinnerRotate:\n\n@-webkit-keyframes spinnerRotate {\n\tfrom {\n\t\t-webkit-transform:rotate(0deg);\n\t}\n\tto {\n\t\t-webkit-transform:rotate(360deg);\n\t}\n}\n\nEn Anglais: Rotate #spinner starting at 0 degrees, ending at 360 degrees, over a timespan of 2 seconds, at a constant speed, and keep repeating this animation forever.\n\nThat\u2019s it! See it in action on the demo page.\n\nNote: these examples only work when you\u2019re using a WebKit-based browser like Safari, Mobile Safari or Google Chrome. I\u2019m confident though that Mozilla and Opera will try their very best catching up with all this new CSS goodness soon.\n\nWhen looking at this example, you see the possibilities are endless. Another advantage is you can change the look of it entirely by only changing a couple of lines of CSS, instead of re-creating and re-downloading the image from some website smelling like web 2.0 gone bad. I made another demo that shows how great it is to be able to change background and foreground colors (even on the fly!).\n\nSo there you have it, a smoothly animated, fully transparent and completely customizable spinner. Cool? I think so. (Ladies?)\n\nBut you can do a lot more with CSS animations than just create pretty spinners. Since I was fooling around with it anyway, I decided to test how far you can push this, space is the final limit, right?\n\nConclusion\n\nCSS has never been more exciting than it is right now. I\u2019m even prepared to say CSS is \u201ccool\u201d again, both for the more experienced front-end developers as for the new designers discovering CSS every day now.\n\nBut\u2026\n\nRemember when Javascript became popular? Remember when Flash became popular? Every time we\u2019re been given new toys, some people aren\u2019t ashamed to use it in a way you can barely call constructive. I\u2019m thinking of Geocities websites, loaded with glowing blocks of text, moving images, bad color usage\u2026 In the wise words of Stan Lee: With great power there must also come great responsibility! A sprinkle of CSS animations is better than a bucket load. Apply with care.", "year": "2009", "author": "Tim Van Damme", "author_slug": "timvandamme", "published": "2009-12-15T00:00:00+00:00", "url": "https://24ways.org/2009/css-animations/", "topic": "code"} {"rowid": 179, "title": "Have a Field Day with HTML5 Forms", "contents": "Forms are usually seen as that obnoxious thing we have to markup and style. I respectfully disagree: forms (on a par with tables) are the most exciting thing we have to work with.\n\nHere we\u2019re going to take a look at how to style a beautiful HTML5 form using some advanced CSS and latest CSS3 techniques. I promise you will want to style your own forms after you\u2019ve read this article.\n\nHere\u2019s what we\u2019ll be creating:\n\n The form. (Icons from Chalkwork Payments)\n\nMeaningful markup\n\nWe\u2019re going to style a simple payment form. There are three main sections on this form:\n\n\n\tThe person\u2019s details\n\tThe address details\n\tThe credit card details\n\n\nWe are also going to use some of HTML5\u2019s new input types and attributes to create more meaningful fields and use less unnecessary classes and ids:\n\n\n\temail, for the email field\n\ttel, for the telephone field\n\tnumber, for the credit card number and security code\n\trequired, for required fields\n\tplaceholder, for the hints within some of the fields\n\tautofocus, to put focus on the first input field when the page loads\n\n\nThere are a million more new input types and form attributes on HTML5, and you should definitely take a look at what\u2019s new on the W3C website. Hopefully this will give you a good idea of how much more fun form markup can be.\n\nA good foundation\n\nEach section of the form will be contained within its own fieldset. In the case of the radio buttons for choosing the card type, we will enclose those options in another nested fieldset.\n\nWe will also be using an ordered list to group each label / input pair. This will provide us with a (kind of) semantic styling hook and it will also make the form easier to read when viewing with no CSS applied:\n\n The unstyled form\n\nSo here\u2019s the markup we are going to be working with:\n\n\n\nMaking things look nice\n\nFirst things first, so let\u2019s start by adding some defaults to our form by resetting the margins and paddings of the elements and adding a default font to the page:\n\nhtml, body, h1, form, fieldset, legend, ol, li {\n\tmargin: 0;\n\tpadding: 0;\n}\nbody {\n\tbackground: #ffffff;\n\tcolor: #111111;\n\tfont-family: Georgia, \"Times New Roman\", Times, serif;\n\tpadding: 20px;\n}\n\nNext we are going to style the form element that is wrapping our fields:\n\nform#payment {\n\tbackground: #9cbc2c;\n\t-moz-border-radius: 5px;\n\t-webkit-border-radius: 5px;\n\tborder-radius: 5px;\n\tpadding: 20px;\n\twidth: 400px;\n}\n\nWe will also remove the border from the fieldset and apply some bottom margin to it. Using the :last-of-type pseudo-class, we remove the bottom margin of the last fieldset \u2014 there is no need for it:\n\nform#payment fieldset {\n\tborder: none;\n\tmargin-bottom: 10px;\n}\nform#payment fieldset:last-of-type {\n\tmargin-bottom: 0;\n}\n\nNext we\u2019ll make the legends big and bold, and we will also apply a light-green text-shadow, to add that little extra special detail:\n\nform#payment legend {\n\tcolor: #384313;\n\tfont-size: 16px;\n\tfont-weight: bold;\n\tpadding-bottom: 10px;\n\ttext-shadow: 0 1px 1px #c0d576;\n}\n\nOur legends are looking great, but how about adding a clear indication of how many steps our form has? Instead of adding that manually to every legend, we can use automatically generated counters.\n\nTo add a counter to an element, we have to use either the :before or :after pseudo-elements to add content via CSS. We will follow these steps:\n\n\n\tcreate a counter using the counter-reset property on the form element\n\tcall the counter with the content property (using the same name we\u2019ve created before)\n\twith the counter-incremet property, indicate that for each element that matches our selector, that counter will be increased by 1\n\n\nform#payment > fieldset > legend:before {\n\tcontent: \"Step \" counter(fieldsets) \": \";\n\tcounter-increment: fieldsets;\n}\n\nFinally, we need to change the style of the legend that is part of the radio buttons group, to make it look like a label:\n\nform#payment fieldset fieldset legend {\n\tcolor: #111111;\n\tfont-size: 13px;\n\tfont-weight: normal;\n\tpadding-bottom: 0;\n}\n\nStyling the lists\n\nFor our list elements, we\u2019ll just add some nice rounded corners and semi-transparent border and background. Because we are using RGBa colors, we should provide a fallback for browsers that don\u2019t support them (that comes before the RBGa color). For the nested lists, we will remove these properties because they would be overlapping:\n\nform#payment ol li {\n\tbackground: #b9cf6a;\n\tbackground: rgba(255,255,255,.3);\n\tborder-color: #e3ebc3;\n\tborder-color: rgba(255,255,255,.6);\n\tborder-style: solid;\n\tborder-width: 2px;\n\t-moz-border-radius: 5px;\n\t-webkit-border-radius: 5px;\n\tborder-radius: 5px;\n\tline-height: 30px;\n\tlist-style: none;\n\tpadding: 5px 10px;\n\tmargin-bottom: 2px;\n}\nform#payment ol ol li {\n\tbackground: none;\n\tborder: none;\n\tfloat: left;\n}\n\nForm controls\n\nNow we only need to style our labels, inputs and the button element.\n\nAll our labels will look the same, with the exception of the one for the radio elements. We will float them to the left and give them a width.\n\nFor the credit card type labels, we will add an icon as the background, and override some of the properties that aren\u2019t necessary. We will be using the attribute selector to specify the background image for each label \u2014 in this case, we use the for attribute of each label.\n\nTo add an extra user-friendly detail, we\u2019ll add a cursor: pointer to the radio button labels on the :hover state, so the user knows that he can simply click them to select that option.\n\nform#payment label {\n\tfloat: left;\n\tfont-size: 13px;\n\twidth: 110px;\n}\nform#payment fieldset fieldset label {\n\tbackground:none no-repeat left 50%;\n\tline-height: 20px;\n\tpadding: 0 0 0 30px;\n\twidth: auto;\n}\nform#payment label[for=visa] {\n\tbackground-image: url(visa.gif);\n}\nform#payment label[for=amex] {\n\tbackground-image: url(amex.gif);\n}\nform#payment label[for=mastercard] {\n\tbackground-image: url(mastercard.gif);\n}\nform#payment fieldset fieldset label:hover {\n\tcursor: pointer;\n}\n\nAlmost there! Now onto the input elements. Here we want to match all inputs, except for the radio ones, and the textarea. For that we will use the negation pseudo-class (:not()). With it we can target all input elements except for the ones with type of radio.\n\nWe will also make sure to add some :focus styles and add the appropriate styling for the radio inputs:\n\nform#payment input:not([type=radio]),\nform#payment textarea {\n\tbackground: #ffffff;\n\tborder: none;\n\t-moz-border-radius: 3px;\n\t-webkit-border-radius: 3px;\n\t-khtml-border-radius: 3px;\n\tborder-radius: 3px;\n\tfont: italic 13px Georgia, \"Times New Roman\", Times, serif;\n\toutline: none;\n\tpadding: 5px;\n\twidth: 200px;\n}\nform#payment input:not([type=submit]):focus,\nform#payment textarea:focus {\n\tbackground: #eaeaea;\n}\nform#payment input[type=radio] {\n\tfloat: left;\n\tmargin-right: 5px;\n}\n\nAnd finally we come to our submit button. To it, we will just add some nice typography and text-shadow, align it to the center of the form and give it some background colors for its different states:\n\nform#payment button {\n\tbackground: #384313;\n\tborder: none;\n\t-moz-border-radius: 20px;\n\t-webkit-border-radius: 20px;\n\t-khtml-border-radius: 20px;\n\tborder-radius: 20px;\n\tcolor: #ffffff;\n\tdisplay: block;\n\tfont: 18px Georgia, \"Times New Roman\", Times, serif;\n\tletter-spacing: 1px;\n\tmargin: auto;\n\tpadding: 7px 25px;\n\ttext-shadow: 0 1px 1px #000000;\n\ttext-transform: uppercase;\n}\nform#payment button:hover {\n\tbackground: #1e2506;\n\tcursor: pointer;\n}\n\nAnd that\u2019s it! See the completed form.\n\nThis form will not look the same on every browser. Internet Explorer and Opera don\u2019t support border-radius (at least not for now); the new input types are rendered as just normal inputs on some browsers; and some of the most advanced CSS, like the counter, :last-of-type or text-shadow are not supported on some browsers. But that doesn\u2019t mean you can\u2019t use them right now, and simplify your development process. My gift to you!", "year": "2009", "author": "Inayaili de Le\u00f3n Persson", "author_slug": "inayailideleon", "published": "2009-12-03T00:00:00+00:00", "url": "https://24ways.org/2009/have-a-field-day-with-html5-forms/", "topic": "code"} {"rowid": 188, "title": "Don't Lose Your :focus", "contents": "For many web designers, accessibility conjures up images of blind users with screenreaders, and the difficulties in making sites accessible to this particular audience. Of course, accessibility covers a wide range of situations that go beyond the extreme example of screenreader users. And while it\u2019s true that making a complex site accessible can often be a daunting prospect, there are also many small things that don\u2019t take anything more than a bit of judicious planning, are very easy to test (without having to buy expensive assistive technology), and can make all the difference to certain user groups.\n\nIn this short article we\u2019ll focus on keyboard accessibility and how careless use of CSS can potentially make your sites completely unusable.\n\nKeyboard Access\n\nUsers who for whatever reason can\u2019t use a mouse will employ a keyboard (or keyboard-like custom interface) to navigate around web pages. By default, they will use TAB and SHIFT + TAB to move from one focusable element (links, form controls and area) of a page to the next.\n\nNote: in OS X, you\u2019ll first need to turn on full keyboard access under System Preferences > Keyboard and Mouse > Keyboard Shortcuts. Safari under Windows needs to have the option Press Tab to highlight each item on a webpage in Preferences > Advanced enabled. Opera is the odd one out, as it has a variety of keyboard navigation options \u2013 the most relevant here being spatial navigation via Shift+Down, Shift+Up, Shift+Left, and Shift+Right).\n\nBut I Don\u2019t Like Your Dotted Lines\u2026\n\nTo show users where they are within a page, browsers place an outline around the element that currently has focus. The \u201cproblem\u201d with these default outlines is that some browsers (Internet Explorer and Firefox) also display them when a user clicks on a focusable element with the mouse. Particularly on sites that make extensive use of image replacement on links with \u201coff left\u201d techniques this can create very unsightly outlines that stretch from the replaced element all the way to the left edge of the browser.\n\n Outline bleeding off to the left (image-replacement example from carsonified.com)\n\nThere is a trivial workaround to prevent outlines from \u201cspilling over\u201d by adding a simple overflow:hidden, which keeps the outline in check around the clickable portion of the image-replaced element itself.\n\n Outline tamed with overflow:hidden\n\nBut for many designers, even this is not enough. As a final solution, many actively suppress outlines altogether in their stylesheets. Controversially, even Eric Meyer\u2019s popular reset.css \u2013 an otherwise excellent set of styles that levels the playing field of varying browser defaults \u2013 suppresses outlines.\n\nhtml, body, div, span, applet, object, iframe ... {\n\t...\n\toutline: 0;\n\t...\n}\n/* remember to define focus styles! */\n:focus {\n\toutline: 0;\n}\n\nYes, in his explanation (and in the CSS itself) Eric does remind designers to define relevant styles for :focus\u2026 but judging by the number of sites that seem to ignore this (and often remove the related comment from the stylesheet altogether), the message doesn\u2019t seem to have sunk in.\n\nAnyway\u2026 hurrah! No more unsightly dotted lines on our lovely design. But what about keyboard users? Although technically they can still TAB from one element to the next, they now get no default cue as to where they are within the page (one notable exception here is Opera, where the outline is displayed regardless of stylesheets)\u2026 and if they\u2019re Safari users, they won\u2019t even get an indication of a link\u2019s target in the status bar, like they would if they hovered over it with the mouse.\n\nOnly Suppress outline For Mouse Users\n\nIs there a way to allow users navigating with the keyboard to retain the standard outline behaviour they\u2019ve come to expect from their browser, while also ensuring that it doesn\u2019t show display for mouse users?\n\n Testing some convoluted style combinations\n\nAfter playing with various approaches (see Better CSS outline suppression for more details), the most elegant solution also seemed to be the simplest: don\u2019t remove the outline on :focus, do it on :active instead \u2013 after all, :active is the dynamic pseudo-class that deals explicitly with the styles that should be applied when a focusable element is clicked or otherwise activated.\n\na:active { outline: none; }\n\nThe only minor issues with this method: if a user activates a link and then uses the browser\u2019s back button, the outline becomes visible. Oh, and old versions of Internet Explorer notoriously get confused by the exact meaning of :focus, :hover and :active, so this method fails in IE6 and below. Personally, I can live with both of these.\n\nNote: at the last minute before submitting this article, I discovered a fatal flaw in my test. It appears that outline still manages to appear in the time between activating a link and the link target loading (which in hindsight is logical \u2013 after activation, the link does indeed receive focus). As my test page only used in-page links, this issue never came up before. The slightly less elegant solution is to also suppress the outline on :hover.\n\na:hover, a:active { outline: none; }\n\nIn Conclusion\n\nOf course, many web designers may argue that they know what\u2019s best, even for their keyboard-using audience. Maybe they\u2019ve removed the default outline and are instead providing some carefully designed :focus styles. If they know for sure that these custom styles are indeed a reliable alternative for their users, more power to them\u2026 but, at the risk of sounding like Jakob \u201cblue underlined links\u201d Nielsen, I\u2019d still argue that sometimes the default browser behaviours are best left alone. Complemented, yes (and if you\u2019re already defining some fancy styles for :hover, by all means feel free to also make them display on :focus)\u2026 but not suppressed.", "year": "2009", "author": "Patrick Lauke", "author_slug": "patricklauke", "published": "2009-12-09T00:00:00+00:00", "url": "https://24ways.org/2009/dont-lose-your-focus/", "topic": "code"} {"rowid": 183, "title": "Designing For The Switch", "contents": "For a long time on the web, we\u2019ve been typographically spoilt. Yes, you heard me correctly. Think about it: our computers come with web fonts already installed; fonts that have been designed specifically to work well online and at small size; and fonts that we can be sure other people have too. \n\nYes, we\u2019ve been spoilt. We don\u2019t need to think about using Verdana, Arial, Georgia or Cambria. \n\nYet, for a long time now, designers have felt we needed more. We want to choose whatever typeface we feel necessary for our designs. We did bad things along the way in pursuit of this goal such as images for text. Smart people dreamt up tools to help us such as sIFR, or Cuf\u00f3n. Only fairly recently, @font-face is supported in most browsers. The floodgates are opening. It really is the dawn of a new typographic era on the web. And we must tread carefully. \n\nThe New Typesetters \n\nMany years ago, before the advent of desktop publishing, if you wanted words set in a particular typeface, you had to go to a Typesetter. A Typesetter, or Compositor, as they were sometimes called, was a person whose job it was to take the written word (in the form of a document or manuscript) and \u2018set\u2019 the type in the desired typeface. The designer would chose what typeface they wanted \u2013 and all the ligatures, underlines, italics and whatnot \u2013 and then scribble all over the manuscript so the typesetter could set the correct type. \n\nThen along came Desktop Publishing and every Tom, Dick and Harry could choose type on their computer and an entire link in the typographic chain was removed within just a few years. Well, that\u2019s progress I guess. That was until six months ago when Typesetting was reborn on the web in the guise of a font service: Typekit. \n\nTypekit \u2013 and services like Typekit such as Typotheque, Kernest and the upcoming Fontdeck \u2013 are typesetting services for the web. You supply them with your content, in the form of a webpage, and they provide you with some JavaScript to render that webpage in the typeface you\u2019ve specified simply by adding the font name in your CSS file. \n\nThanks to services like these, font foundries are now talking to create licensing structures to allow us to embed fonts into our web pages legally \u2013 which has always been a sticking point in the past. So, finally, us designers can get what we want: whatever typeface we want on the web. \n\nYes, but\u2026 there are hurdles. One of which is the subject of this article. \n\nThe differences between Web Fonts and other fonts \n\nWeb fonts are different to normal fonts. They differ in a whole bunch of ways, from loose letter spacing to larger x-heights. But perhaps the most notable practical difference is file size. Let\u2019s take a look at one of Typekit\u2019s latest additions from the FontFont library, Meta. \n\nMeta Roman weighs in at 42 KB. This is a fairly typical file size for a single weight of a good font. Now, let\u2019s have a look at Verdana. Verdana is 186 KB. For one weight. The four weight family for Verdana weighs in at 686 KB. Four weights for half a megabyte!? Why so huge? \n\nWell, Verdana has a lot of information packed into its 186 KB. It has the largest hinting data table of any typeface (the information carried by a font that tells it how to align itself to the pixels on your screen). As it has been shipped with Microsoft products since 1996, it has had time to grow to support many, many languages. Along with its cousin, Georgia (283 KB), Verdana was a new breed of typeface. And it\u2019s grown fat. \n\nIf really serious web typography takes off \u2013 and by that I mean typefaces specifically designed for the screen \u2013 then we\u2019re going to see more fonts increase in file size as the font files include more data. So, if you\u2019re embedding a font weighing in at 100 KB, what happens? \n\nThe Flash of Unstyled Text \n\nWe all remember the Flash of Unstyled Content bug on Internet Explorer, right? That annoying bug that caused a momentary flash of unstyled HTML page. Well, the same thing can happen with embedding fonts using @font-face. An effect called The Flash of Unstyled Text (FOUT), first coined by Paul Irish. Personally, I prefer to call it the Flash of UnTypeset Text (still FOUT), as the text is styled, just not with what you want. \n\nIf you embed a typeface in your CSS, then the browser will download that typeface. Typically, browsers differ in the way they handle this procedure. \n\nFirefox and Opera will render the text using the next font in your font stack until the first (embedded) font is loaded. It will then switch to the embedded font. \n\nWebkit takes the approach that you asked for that font so it will wait until it\u2019s completely loaded before showing it you. \n\nIn Opera and Firefox, you get a FOUT. In Webkit, you don\u2019t. You wait. \n\nHang on there. Didn\u2019t I say that good web fonts weigh in considerably more than \u2018normal\u2019 fonts? And whilst the browser is downloading the font, the user gets what to look at? Some pictures, background colours and whatever else isn\u2019t HTML? I believe Webkit\u2019s handling of font embedding \u2013 as deliberate as it is \u2013 is damaging to the practice of font embedding. Why? Well, we can design to a switch in typeface (as jarring as that is for the user), but we can\u2019t design to blank space. \n\nLet\u2019s have a closer look at how we can design to FOUT. \n\nMore considered font stacks \n\nWe all know that font stacks in CSS are there for when a user doesn\u2019t have a font; the browser will jump to the next one in the stack. Adding embedded fonts into the font stack means that because of FOUT (in gecko and Opera), the user can see a switch, and depending on their connection that switch could happen well into any reading that the user may be doing. \n\nThe practicalities of this are that a user could be reading and be towards the end of a line when the paragraph they are reading changes shape. The word they were digesting suddenly changes to three lines down. It\u2019s the online equivalent of someone turning the page for you when you least expect it. So, how can we think about our font stacks slightly differently so we can minimise the switch? \n\nTwo years ago, Richard Rutter wrote on this very site about increasing our font stacks. By increasing the font stacks (by using his handy matrix) we can begin to experiment with different typefaces. However, when we embed a typeface, we must look very carefully at the typefaces in the font stack and the relationship between them. Because, previously, the user would not see a switch from one typeface to another, they\u2019d just get either one or the other. Not both. With FOUT, the user sees two typefaces. \n\nBy carefully looking at the characteristics of the typefaces you choose, you can minimise the typographic \u2018distance\u2019 between the type down the stack. In doing so, you minimise the jarring effect of the switch. \n\nLet\u2019s take a look at an example of how to go about this. \n\nMicro Typography to build better font stacks \n\nLet\u2019s say I want to use a recent edition to Typekit \u2013 Meta Serif Book \u2013 as my embedded font. My font stack would start like this: \n\nfont-family: 'Meta Serif Bold'; \n\nWhere do you go from here? Well, first, familiarise yourself with Richard\u2019s Font Matrix so you get an idea of what fonts are available for different people. Then start by looking closely at the characters of the embedded font and then compare them to different fonts from the matrix. \n\nWhen I do this, I\u2019m looking to match type characteristics such as x-height, contrast (the thickness and thinness of strokes), the stress (the angle of contrast) and the shape of the serifs (if the typeface has any). \n\n\n\nUsing just these simple comparative metrics means you can get to a \u2018best fit\u2019 reasonably quickly. And remember, you\u2019re not after an ideal match. You\u2019re after a match that means the switch is less painful for the reader, but also a typeface that carries similar characteristics so your design doesn\u2019t change too much. \n\nBuilding upon my choice of embedded font, I can quickly build up a stack by comparing letters. \n\n\n\nThis then creates my \u2018best fit\u2019 stack. \n\n\n\nThis translates to the CSS as: \n\nfont-family: 'Meta Serif Bold', 'Lucida Bright', Cambria, Georgia, serif \n\nFollowing this process, and ending up with considered font stacks, means that we can design to the Flash of UnTypeset Content and ensure that our readers don\u2019t get a diminished experience.", "year": "2009", "author": "Mark Boulton", "author_slug": "markboulton", "published": "2009-12-16T00:00:00+00:00", "url": "https://24ways.org/2009/designing-for-the-switch/", "topic": "design"} {"rowid": 171, "title": "Rock Solid HTML Emails", "contents": "At some stage in your career, it\u2019s likely you\u2019ll be asked by a client to design a HTML email. Before you rush to explain that all the cool kids are using social media, keep in mind that when done correctly, email is still one of the best ways to promote you and your clients online. In fact, a recent survey showed that every dollar spent on email marketing this year generated more than $40 in return. That\u2019s more than any other marketing channel, including the cool ones.\n\nThere are a whole host of ingredients that contribute to a good email marketing campaign. Permission, relevance, timeliness and engaging content are all important. Even so, the biggest challenge for designers still remains building an email that renders well across all the popular email clients.\n\nSame same, but different\n\nBefore getting into the details, there are some uncomfortable facts that those new to HTML email should be aware of. Building an email is not like building for the web. While web browsers continue their onward march towards standards, many email clients have stubbornly stayed put. Some have even gone backwards. In 2007, Microsoft switched the Outlook rendering engine from Internet Explorer to Word. Yes, as in the word processor. Add to this the quirks of the major web-based email clients like Gmail and Hotmail, sprinkle in a little Lotus Notes and you\u2019ll soon realize how different the email game is.\n\nWhile it\u2019s not without its challenges, rest assured it can be done. In my experience the key is to focus on three things. First, you should keep it simple. The more complex your email design, the more likely is it to choke on one of the popular clients with poor standards support. Second, you need to take your coding skills back a good decade. That often means nesting tables, bringing CSS inline and following the coding guidelines I\u2019ll outline below. Finally, you need to test your designs regularly. Just because a template looks nice in Hotmail now, doesn\u2019t mean it will next week.\n\nSetting your lowest common denominator\n\nTo maintain your sanity, it\u2019s a good idea to decide exactly which email clients you plan on supporting when building a HTML email. While general research is helpful, the email clients your subscribers are using can vary significantly from list to list. If you have the time there are a number of tools that can tell you specifically which email clients your subscribers are using. Trust me, if the testing shows almost none of them are using a client like Lotus Notes, save yourself some frustration and ignore it altogether. \n\nKnowing which email clients you\u2019re targeting not only makes the building process easier, it can save you lots of time in the testing phase too. For the purpose of this article, I\u2019ll be sharing techniques that give the best results across all of the popular clients, including the notorious ones like Gmail, Lotus Notes 6 and Outlook 2007. Just remember that pixel perfection in all email clients is a pipe dream.\n\nLet\u2019s get started.\n\nUse tables for layout\n\nBecause clients like Gmail and Outlook 2007 have poor support for float, margin and padding, you\u2019ll need to use tables as the framework of your email. While nested tables are widely supported, consistent treatment of width, margin and padding within table cells is not. For the best results, keep the following in mind when coding your table structure.\n\nSet the width in each cell, not the table\n\nWhen you combine table widths, td widths, td padding and CSS padding into an email, the final result is different in almost every email client. The most reliable way to set the width of your table is to set a width for each cell, not for the table itself.\n\n\n\t\t | \n\t |
\n\t\t\tYour email code goes here.\n\t\t | \n\t