{"rowid": 293, "title": "A Favor for Your Future Self", "contents": "We tend to think about the future when we build things. What might we want to be able to add later? How can we refactor this down the road? Will this be easy to maintain in six months, a year, two years? As best we can, we try to think about the what-ifs, and build our websites, systems, and applications with this lens. \nWe comment our code to explain what we knew at the time and how that impacted how we built something. We add to-dos to the things we want to change. These are all great things! Whether or not we come back to those to-dos, refactor that one thing, or add new features, we put in a bit of effort up front just in case to give us a bit of safety later.\nI want to talk about a situation that Past Alicia and Team couldn\u2019t even foresee or plan for. Recently, the startup I was a part of had to remove large sections of our website. Not just content, but entire pages and functionality. It wasn\u2019t a very pleasant experience, not only for the reason why we had to remove so much of what we had built, but also because it\u2019s the ultimate \u201cI really hope this doesn\u2019t break something else\u201d situation. It was a stressful and tedious effort of triple checking that the things we were removing weren\u2019t dependencies elsewhere. To be honest, we wouldn\u2019t have been able to do this with any amount of success or confidence without our test suite.\nWriting tests for code is one of those things that developers really, really don\u2019t want to do. It\u2019s one of the easiest things to cut in the development process, and there\u2019s often a struggle to have developers start writing tests in the first place. One of the best lessons the web has taught us is that we can\u2019t, in good faith, trust the happy path. We must make sure ourselves, and our users, aren\u2019t in a tough spot later on because we only thought of the best case scenarios.\nJavaScript\nRegardless of your opinion on whether or not everything needs to be built primarily with JavaScript, if you\u2019re choosing to build a JavaScript heavy app, you absolutely should be writing some combination of unit and integration tests.\nUnit tests are for testing extremely isolated and small pieces of code, which we refer to as the units themselves. Great for reused functions and small, scoped areas, this is the closest you examine your code with the testing microscope. For example, if we were to build a calculator, the most minute piece we could test could be the basic operations.\n/*\n * This example uses a test framework called Jasmine\n */\n\ndescribe(\"Calculator Operations\", function () {\n\n it(\"Should add two numbers\", function () {\n\n // Say we have a calculator\n Calculator.init();\n\n // We can run the function that does our addition calculation...\n var result = Calculator.addNumbers(7,3);\n\n // ...and ensure we're getting the right output\n expect(result).toBe(10);\n\n });\n});\nEven though these teeny bits work in isolation, we should ensure that connecting the large pieces work, as well. This is where integration tests excel. These tests ensure that two or more different areas of code, that may not directly know about each other, still behave in expected ways. Let\u2019s build upon our calculator - we may want the operations to be saved in memory after a calculation runs. This isn\u2019t as suited for a unit test because there are a few other moving pieces involved in the process (the calculations, checking if the result was an error, etc.).\n it(\u201cShould remember the last calculation\u201d, function () {\n\n // Run an operation\n Calculator.addNumbers(7,10);\n\n // Expect something else to have happened as a result\n expect(Calculator.updateCurrentValue).toHaveBeenCalled();\n expect(Calculator.currentValue).toBe(17);\n });\nUnit and integration tests provide assurance that your hand-rolled JavaScript should, for the most part, never fail in a grand fashion. Although it still might happen, you could be able to catch problems way sooner than without a test suite, and hopefully never push those failures to your production environment.\nInterfaces\nRegardless of how you\u2019re building something, it most definitely has some kind of interface. Whether you\u2019re using a very barebones structure, or you\u2019re leveraging a whole design system, these things can be tested as well.\nAcceptance testing helps us ensure that users can get from point A to point B within our web things, which can provide assurance that major features are always functioning properly. By simulating user input and data entry, we can go through whole user workflows to test for both success and failure scenarios. These are not necessarily for simulating edge-case scenarios, but rather ensuring that our core offerings are stable.\nFor example, if your site requires signup, you want to make sure the workflow is behaving as expected - allowing valid information to go through signup, while invalid information does not let you progress.\n/*\n * This example uses Jasmine along with an add-on called jasmine-integration\n */\n\ndescribe(\"Acceptance tests\", function () {\n\n // Go to our signup page\n var page = visit(\"/signup\");\n\n // Fill our signup form with invalid information\n page.fill_in(\"input[name='email']\", \"Not An Email\");\n page.fill_in(\"input[name='name']\", \"Alicia\");\n page.click(\"button[type=submit]\");\n\n // Check that we get an expected error message\n it(\"Shouldn't allow signup with invalid information\", function () {\n expect(page.find(\"#signupError\").hasClass(\"hidden\")).toBeFalsy();\n });\n\n // Now, fill our signup form with valid information\n page.fill_in(\"input[name='email']\", \"thisismyemail@gmail.com\");\n page.fill_in(\"input[name='name']\", \"Gerry\");\n page.click(\"button[type=submit]\");\n\n // Check that we get an expected success message and the error message is hidden\n it(\"Should allow signup with valid information\", function () {\n expect(page.find(\"#signupError\").hasClass(\"hidden\")).toBeTruthy();\n expect(page.find(\"#thankYouMessage\").hasClass(\"hidden\")).toBeFalsy();\n });\n});\nIn terms of visual design, we\u2019re now able to take snapshots of what our interfaces look like before and after any code changes to see what has changed. We call this visual regression testing. Rather than being a pass or fail test like our other examples thus far, this is more of an awareness test, intended to inform developers of all the visual differences that have occurred, intentional or not. Developers may accidentally introduce a styling change or fix that has unintended side effects on other areas of a website - visual regression testing helps us catch these sooner rather than later. These do require a bit more consistent grooming than other tests, but can be valuable in major CSS refactors or if your CSS is generally a bit like Jenga.\nTools like PhantomCSS will take screenshots of your pages, and do a visual comparison to check what has changed between two sets of images. The code would look something like this:\n/*\n * This example uses PhantomCSS\n */\n\ncasper.start(\"/home\").then(function(){\n\n // Initial state of form\n phantomcss.screenshot(\"#signUpForm\", \"sign up form\");\n\n // Hit the sign up button (should trigger error)\n casper.click(\"button#signUp\");\n\n // Take a screenshot of the UI component\n phantomcss.screenshot(\"#signUpForm\", \"sign up form error\");\n\n // Fill in form by name attributes & submit\n casper.fill(\"#signUpForm\", {\n name: \"Alicia Sedlock\",\n email: \"alicia@example.com\"\n }, true);\n\n // Take a second screenshot of success state\n phantomcss.screenshot(\"#signUpForm\", \"sign up form success\");\n});\nYou run this code before starting any development, to create your baseline set of screen captures. After you\u2019ve completed a batch of work, you run PhantomCSS again. This will create a second batch of screenshots, which are then put through an image comparison tool to display any differences that occurred. Say you changed your margins on our form elements \u2013 your image diff would look something like this:\n\nThis is a great tool for ensuring not just your site retains its expected styling, but it\u2019s also great for ensuring nothing accidentally changes in the living style guide or modular components you may have developed. It\u2019s hard to keep eagle eyes on every visual aspect of your site or app, so visual regression testing helps to keep these things monitored.\nConclusion\nThe shape and size of what you\u2019re testing for your site or app will vary. You may not need lots of unit or integration tests if you don\u2019t write a lot of JavaScript. You may not need visual regression testing for a one page site. It\u2019s important to assess your codebase to see which tests would provide the most benefit for you and your team.\nWriting tests isn\u2019t a joy for most developers, myself included. But I end up thanking Past Alicia a lot when there are tests, because otherwise I would have introduced a lot of issues into codebases. Shipping code that\u2019s broken breaks trust with our users, and it\u2019s our responsibility as developers to make sure that trust isn\u2019t broken. Testing shouldn\u2019t be considered a \u201cnice to have\u201d - it should be an integral piece of our workflow and our day-to-day job.", "year": "2016", "author": "Alicia Sedlock", "author_slug": "aliciasedlock", "published": "2016-12-03T00:00:00+00:00", "url": "https://24ways.org/2016/a-favor-for-your-future-self/", "topic": "code"}
{"rowid": 296, "title": "Animation in Design Systems", "contents": "Our modern front-end workflow has matured over time to include design systems and component libraries that help us stay organized, improve workflows, and simplify maintenance. These systems, when executed well, ensure proper documentation of the code available and enable our systems to scale with reduced communication conflicts. \nBut while most of these systems take a critical stance on fonts, colors, and general building blocks, their treatment of animation remains disorganized and ad-hoc. Let\u2019s leverage existing structures and workflows to reduce friction when it comes to animation and create cohesive and performant user experiences. \nUnderstand the importance of animation\nPart of the reason we treat animation like a second-class citizen is that we don\u2019t really consider its power. When users are scanning a website (or any environment or photo), they are attempting to build a spatial map of their surroundings. During this process, nothing quite commands attention like something in motion. \nWe are biologically trained to notice motion: evolutionarily speaking, our survival depends on it. For this reason, animation when done well can guide your users. It can aid and reinforce these maps, and give us a sense that we understand the UX more deeply. We retrieve information and put it back where it came from instead of something popping in and out of place. \n\n\u201cWhere did that menu go? Oh it\u2019s in there.\u201d \n\nFor a deeper dive into how animation can connect disparate states, I wrote about the Importance of Context-Shifting in UX Patterns for CSS-Tricks.\nAn animation flow on mobile.\nAnimation also aids in perceived performance. Viget conducted a study where they measured user engagement with a standard loading GIF versus a custom animation. Customers were willing to wait almost twice as long for the custom loader, even though it wasn\u2019t anything very fancy or crazy. Just by showing their users that they cared about them, they stuck around, and the bounce rates dropped.\n\n14 second generic loading screen.22 second custom loading screen.\nThis also works for form submission. Giving your personal information over to an online process like a static form can be a bit harrowing. It becomes more harrowing without animation used as a signal that something is happening, and that some process is completing. That same animation can also entertain users and make them feel as though the wait isn\u2019t as long. \nEli Fitch gave a talk at CSS Dev Conf called: \u201cPerceived Performance: The Only Kind That Really Matters\u201d, which is one of my favorite talk titles of all time. In it, he discussed how we tend to measure things like timelines and network requests because they are more quantifiable\u2013and therefore easier to measure\u2013but that measuring how a user feels when visiting the site is more important and worth the time and attention. \nIn his talk, he states \u201cHumans over-estimate passive waits by 36%, per Richard Larson of MIT\u201d. This means that if you\u2019re not using animation to speed up how fast the wait time of a form submission loads, users are perceiving it to be much slower than the dev tools timeline is recording.\nReign it in\nUnlike fonts, colors, and so on, we tend to add animation in as a last step, which leads to disorganized implementations that lack overall cohesion. If you asked a designer or developer if they would create a mockup or build a UI without knowing the fonts they were working with, they would dislike the idea. Not knowing the building blocks they\u2019re working with means that the design can fall apart or the development can break with something so fundamental left out at the start. Good animation works the same way.\nThe first step in reigning in your use of animation is to perform an animation audit. Look at all the places you are using animation on your site, or the places you aren\u2019t using animation but probably should. (Hint: perceived performance of a loader on a form submission can dramatically change your bounce rates.) \nNot sure how to perform a good audit? Val Head has a great chapter on it in her book, Designing Interface Animations, which has of buckets of research and great ideas.\nEven some beautiful component libraries that have animation in the docs make this mistake. You don\u2019t need every kind of animation, just like you don\u2019t need every kind of font. This bloats our code. Ask yourself questions like: do you really need a flip 180 degree animation? I can\u2019t even conceive of a place on a typical UI where that would be useful, yet most component libraries that I\u2019ve seen have a mixin that does just this.\nWhich leads to\u2026\nHave an opinion\nMany people are confused about Material Design. They think that Material Design is Motion Design, mostly because they\u2019ve never seen anyone take a stance on animation before and document these opinions well. But every time you use Material Design as your motion design language, people look at your site and think GOOGLE. Now that\u2019s good branding.\nBy using Google\u2019s motion design language and not your own, you\u2019re losing out on a chance to be memorable on your own website.\nWhat does having an opinion on motion look like in practice? It could mean you\u2019ve decided that you never flip things. It could mean that your eases are always going to glide. In that instance, you would put your efforts towards finding an ease that looks \u201cgliding\u201d and pulling out any transform: scaleX(-1) animation you find on your site. Across teams, everyone knows not to spend time mocking up flipping animation (even if they\u2019re working on an entirely different codebase), and to instead work on something that feels like it glides. You save time and don\u2019t have to communicate again and again to make things feel cohesive.\nCreate good developer resources\nSometimes people don\u2019t incorporate animation into a design system because they aren\u2019t sure how, beyond the base hover states. All animation properties can be broken into interchangeable pieces. This allows developers and designers alike to mix and match and iterate quickly, while still staying in the correct language. Here are some recommendations (with code and a demo to follow):\nCreate timing units, similar to h1, h2, h3. In a system I worked on recently, I called these t1, t2, t3. T1 would be reserved for longer pieces, down to t5 which is a bit like h5 in that it\u2019s the default (usually around .25 seconds or thereabouts).\nKeep animation easings for entrance, exit, entrance emphasis and exit emphasis that people can commonly refer to. This, and the animation-fill-mode, are likely to be the only two properties that can be reused for the entrance and exit of the animation.\nUse the animation-name property to define the keyframes for the animation itself. I would recommend starting with 5 or 6 before making a slew of them, and see if you need more. Writing 30 different animations might seem like a nice resource, but just like your color palette having too many can unnecessarily bulk up your codebase, and keep it from feeling cohesive. Think critically about what you need here. \nSee the Pen Modularized Animation for Component Libraries by Sarah Drasner (@sdras) on CodePen.\n\nThe example above is pared-down, but you can see how in a robust system, having pieces that are interchangeable cached across the whole system would save time for iterations and prototyping, not to mention make it easy to make adjustments for different feeling movement on the same animation easily.\nOne low hanging fruit might be a loader that leads to a success dialog. On a big site, you might have that pattern many times, so writing up a component that does only that helps you move faster while also allowing you to really zoom in and focus on that pattern. You avoid throwing something together at the last minute, or using a GIF, which are really heavy and mushy on retina. You can make singular pieces that look really refined and are reusable. \nReact and Vue Implementations are great for reusable components, as you can create a building block with a common animation pattern, and once created, it can be a resource for all. Remember to take advantage of things like props to allow for timing and easing adjustments like we have in the previous example!\nResponsive\nAt the very least we should ensure that interaction also works well on mobile, but if we\u2019d like to create interactions that take advantage of all of the gestures mobile has to offer, we can use libraries like zingtouch or hammer to work with swipe or multiple finger detection. With a bit of work, these can all be created through native detection as well.\nResponsive web pages can specify initial-scale=1.0 in the meta tag so that the device is not waiting the required 300ms on the secondary tap before calling action. Interaction for touch events must either start from a larger touch-target (40px \u00d7 40px or greater) or use @media(pointer:coarse) as support allows.\nBuy-in\nSometimes people don\u2019t create animation resources simply because it gets deprioritized. But design systems were also something we once had to fight for, too. This year at CSS Dev Conf, Rachel Nabors demonstrated how to plot out animation wants vs. needs on a graph (reproduced with her permission) to help prioritize them:\n\n\nThis helps people you\u2019re working with figure out the relative necessity and workload of the addition of these animations and think more critically about it. You\u2019re also more likely to get something through if you\u2019re proving that what you\u2019re making is needed and can be reused. \nGood compromises can be made this way: \u201cwe\u2019re not going to go all out and create an animated \u2018About Us\u2019 page like you wanted, but I suppose we can let our users know their contact email went through with a small progress and success notification.\u201d \nSuccessfully pushing smaller projects through helps build trust with your team, and lets them see what this type of collaboration can look like. This builds up the type of relationship necessary to push through projects that are more involved. It can\u2019t be overstressed that good communication is key.\nGet started!\nWith these tools and good communication, we can make our codebases more efficient, performant, and feel better for our users. We can enhance the user experience on our sites, and create great resources for our teams to allow them to move more quickly while innovating beautifully.", "year": "2016", "author": "Sarah Drasner", "author_slug": "sarahdrasner", "published": "2016-12-16T00:00:00+00:00", "url": "https://24ways.org/2016/animation-in-design-systems/", "topic": "code"}
{"rowid": 290, "title": "Creating a Weekly Research Cadence", "contents": "Working on a product team, it\u2019s easy to get hyper-focused on building features and lose sight of your users and their daily challenges. User research can be time-consuming to set up, so it often becomes ad-hoc and irregular, only performed in response to a particular question or concern. But without frequent touch points and opportunities for discovery, your product will stagnate and become less and less relevant. Setting up an efficient cadence of weekly research conversations will re-focus your team on user problems and provide a steady stream of insights for product development.\nAs my team transitioned into a Lean process earlier this year, we needed a way to get more feedback from users in a short amount of time. Our users are internet marketers\u2014always busy and often difficult to reach. Scheduling research took days of emailing back and forth to find mutually agreeable times, and juggling one-off conversations made it difficult to connect with more than one or two people per week. The slow pace of research was allowing additional risk to creep into our product development.\nI wanted to find a way for our team to test ideas and validate assumptions sooner and more often\u2014but without increasing the administrative burden of scheduling. The solution: creating a regular cadence of research and testing that required a minimum of effort to coordinate. \nSetting up a weekly user research cadence accelerated our learning and built momentum behind strategic experiments. By dedicating time every week to talk to a few users, we made ongoing research a painless part of every weekly sprint. But increasing the frequency of our research had other benefits as well. With only five working days between sessions, a weekly cadence forced us to keep our work small and iterative. Committing to testing something every week meant showing work earlier and more often than we might have preferred\u2014pushing us out of your comfort zone into a process of more rapid experimentation.\nBest of all, frequent conversations with users helped us become more customer-focused. After just a few weeks in a consistent research cadence, I noticed user feedback weaving itself through our planning and strategy sessions. Comments like \u201cRemember what Jenna said last week, about not being able to customize her lists?\u201d would pop up as frequent reference points to guide our decisions. As discussions become less about subjective opinions and more about responding to user needs, we saw immediate improvement in the quality of our solutions.\nEstablishing an efficient recruitment process\nThe key to creating a regular cadence of ongoing user research is an efficient recruitment and scheduling process\u2014along with a commitment to prioritize the time needed for research conversations. This is an invaluable tool for product teams (whether or not they follow a Lean process), but could easily be adapted for content strategy teams, agency teams, a UX team of one, or any other project that would benefit from short, frequent conversations with users. \nThe process I use requires a few hours of setup time at the beginning, but pays off in better learning and better releases over the long run. Almost any team could use this as a starting point and adapt it to their own needs.\nPick a dedicated time each week for research\nIn order to make research a priority, we started by choosing a time each week when everyone on the product team was available. Between stand-ups, grooming sessions, and roadmap reviews, it wasn\u2019t easy to do! Nevertheless, it\u2019s important to include as many people as possible in conversations with your users. Getting a second-hand summary of research results doesn\u2019t have the same impact as hearing someone describe their frustrations and concerns first-hand. The more people in the room to hear those concerns, the more likely they are to become priorities for your team.\nI blocked off 2 hours for research conversations every Thursday afternoon. We make this time sacred, and never schedule other meetings or work across those hours. \nDivide your time into several research slots\nAfter my weekly cadence was set, I divided the time into four 20-minute time slots. Twenty minutes is long enough for us to ask several open-ended questions or get feedback on a prototype, without being a burden on our users\u2019 busy schedules. Depending on your work, you may need schedule longer sessions\u2014but beware the urge to create blocks that last an hour or more. A weekly research cadence is designed to facilitate rapid, ongoing feedback and testing; it should force you to talk to users often and to keep your work small and iterative. Projects that require longer, more in-depth testing will probably need a dedicated research project of their own.\nI used the scheduling software Calendly to create interview appointments on a calendar that I can share with users, and customized the confirmation and reminder emails with information about how to access our video conferencing software. (Most of our research is done remotely, but this could be set up with details for in-person meetings as well.) Automating these emails and reminders took a little bit of time to set up, but was worth it for how much faster it made the process overall.\n\n\nInvite users to sign up for a time that\u2019s convenient for them\nWith a calendar set up and follow-up emails automated, it becomes incredibly easy to schedule research conversations. Each week, I send a short email out to a small group of users inviting them to participate, explaining that this is a chance to provide feedback that will improve our product or occasionally promoting the opportunity to get a sneak peek at new features we\u2019re working on. The email includes a link to the Calendly appointments, allowing users who are interested to opt in to a time that fits their schedule.\nSetting up appointments the first go around involved a bit of educated guessing. How many invitations would it take to fill all four of my weekly slots? How far in advance did I need to recruit users? But after a few weeks of trial and error, I found that sending 12-16 invitations usually allows me to fill all four interview slots. Our users often have meetings pop up at short notice, so we get the best results when I send the recruiting email on Tuesday, two days before my research block.\nIt may take a bit of experimentation to fine tune your process, but it\u2019s worth the effort to get it right. (The worst thing that\u2019s happened since I began recruiting this way was receiving emails from users complaining that there were no open slots available!) I can now fill most of an afternoon with back-to-back user research sessions just by sending just one or two emails each week, increasing our research pace while leaving plenty time to focus on discovery and design.\nGetting the most out of your research sessions\nAs you get comfortable with the rhythm of talking to users each week, you\u2019ll find more and more ways to get value out of your conversations. At first, you may prefer to just show work in progress\u2014such as mockups or a simple prototype\u2014and ask open-ended questions to measure user reaction. When you begin new projects, you may want to use this time to research behavior on existing features\u2014either watching participants as they use part of your product or asking them to give an account of a recent experience in your app. You may even want to run more abstracted Lean experiments, if that\u2019s the best way to validate the assumptions your team is working from.\nWhatever you do, plan some time a day or two later to come back together and review what you\u2019ve learned each week. Synthesizing research outcomes as a group will help keep your team in alignment and allow each person to highlight what they took away from each conversation. \nOver time, you may find that the pace of weekly user research becomes more exhausting than energizing, especially if the responsibility for scheduling and planning falls on just one person. Don\u2019t allow yourself to get burned out; a healthy research cadence should also include time to rest and reflect if the pace becomes too rapid to sustain. Take breaks as needed, then pick up the pace again as soon as you\u2019re ready.", "year": "2016", "author": "Wren Lanier", "author_slug": "wrenlanier", "published": "2016-12-02T00:00:00+00:00", "url": "https://24ways.org/2016/creating-a-weekly-research-cadence/", "topic": "ux"}
{"rowid": 305, "title": "CSS Writing Modes", "contents": "Since you may not have a lot of time, I\u2019m going to start at the end, with the dessert.\nYou can use a little-known, yet important and powerful CSS property to make text run vertically. Like this.\n\nOr instead of running text vertically, you can layout a set of icons or interface buttons in this way. Or, of course, with anything on your page. \nThe CSS I\u2019ve applied makes the browser rethink the orientation of the world, and flow the layout of this element at a 90\u00b0 angle to \u201cnormal\u201d. Check out the live demo, highlight the headline, and see how the cursor is now sideways.\nSee the Pen Writing Mode Demo \u2014 Headline by Jen Simmons (@jensimmons) on CodePen.\n\nThe code for accomplishing this is pretty simple. \nh1 { \n writing-mode: vertical-rl;\n}\nThat\u2019s all it takes to switch the writing mode from the web\u2019s default horizontal top-to-bottom mode to a vertical right-to-left mode. If you apply such code to the html element, the entire page is switched, affecting the scroll direction, too. \nIn my example above, I\u2019m telling the browser that only the h1 will be in this vertical-rl mode, while the rest of my page stays in the default of horizontal-tb.\nSo now the dessert course is over. Let me serve up this whole meal, and explain the the CSS Writing Mode Specification.\nWhy learn about writing modes?\nThere are three reasons I\u2019m teaching writing modes to everyone\u2014including western audiences\u2014and explaining the whole system, instead of quickly showing you a simple trick.\n\n\nWe live in a big, diverse world, and learning about other languages is fascinating. Many of you lay out pages in languages like Chinese, Japanese and Korean. Or you might be inspired to in the future.\n\n\nUsing writing-mode to turn bits sideways is cool. This CSS can be used in all kinds of creative ways, even if you are working only in English.\n\nMost importantly, I\u2019ve found understanding Writing Modes incredibly helpful when understanding Flexbox and CSS Grid. Before I learned Writing Mode, I felt like there was still a big hole in my knowledge, something I just didn\u2019t get about why Grid and Flexbox work the way they do. Once I wrapped my head around Writing Modes, Grid and Flexbox got a lot easier. Suddenly the Alignment properties, align-* and justify-*, made sense.\n\nWhether you know about it or not, the writing mode is the first building block of every layout we create. You can do what we\u2019ve been doing for 25 years \u2013 and leave your page set to the default left-to-right direction, horizontal top-to-bottom writing mode. Or you can enter a world of new possibilities where content flows in other directions.\nCSS properties\nI\u2019m going to focus on the CSS writing-mode property in this article. It has five possible options:\n writing-mode: horizontal-tb;\n writing-mode: vertical-rl;\n writing-mode: vertical-lr;\n writing-mode: sideways-rl;\n writing-mode: sideways-lr;\nThe CSS Writing Modes Specification is designed to support a wide range of written languages in all our human and linguistic complexity. Which\u2014spoiler alert\u2014is pretty insanely complex. The global evolution of written languages has been anything but simple. \nSo I\u2019ve got to start with explaining some basic concepts of web page layout and writing systems. Then I can show you what these CSS properties do. \nInline Direction, Block Direction, and Character Direction\nIn the world of the web, there\u2019s a concept of \u2018block\u2019 and \u2018inline\u2019 layout. If you\u2019ve ever written display: block or display: inline, you\u2019ve leaned on these concepts. \nIn the default writing mode, blocks stack vertically starting at the top of the page and working their way down. Think of how a bunch of block-levels elements stack\u2014like a bunch of a paragraphs\u2014that\u2019s the block direction. \n\nInline is how each line of text flows. The default on the web is from left to right, in horizontal lines. Imagine this text that you are reading right now, being typed out one character at a time on a typewriter. That\u2019s the inline direction. \n\nThe character direction is which way the characters point. If you type a capital \u201cA\u201d for instance, on which side is the top of the letter? Different languages can point in different directions. Most languages have their characters pointing towards the top of the page, but not all.\n\nPut all three together, and you start to see how they work as a system. \nThe default settings for the web work like this.\nNow that we know what block, inline, and character directions mean, let\u2019s see how they are used in different writing systems from around the world.\nThe four writing systems of CSS Writing Modes\nThe CSS Writing Modes Specification handles all the use cases for four major writing systems; Latin, Arabic, Han and Mongolian. \nLatin-based systems\nOne writing system dominates the world more than any other, reportedly covering about 70% of the world\u2019s population. \n\nThe text is horizontal, running from left to right, or LTR. The block direction runs from top to bottom. \nIt\u2019s called the Latin-based system because it includes all languages that use the Latin alphabet, including English, Spanish, German, French, and many others. But there are many non-Latin-alphabet languages that also use this system, including Greek, Cyrillic (Russian, Ukrainian, Bulgarian, Serbian, etc.), and Brahmic scripts (Devanagari, Thai, Tibetan), and many more.\nYou don\u2019t need to do anything in your CSS to trigger this mode. This is the default. \nBest practices, however, dictate that you declare in your opening element which language and which direction (LTR or RTL) you are using. This website, for instance, uses to let the browser know this content is published in Great Britian\u2019s version of English, in a left to right direction. \nArabic-based systems\nArabic, Hebrew and a few other languages run the inline direction from right to left. This is commonly known as RTL. \nNote that the inline direction still runs horizontally. The block direction runs from top to bottom. And the characters are upright.\n\nIt\u2019s not just the flow of text that runs from right to left, but everything about the layout of the website. The upper right-hand corner is the starting position. Important things are on the right. The eyes travel from right to left. So, typically RTL websites use layouts that are just like LTR websites, only flipped.\nOn websites that support both LTR and RTL, like the United Nations\u2019 site at un.org, the two layouts are mirror images of each other.\nFor many web developers, our experiences with internationalization have focused solely on supporting Arabic and Hebrew script. \nCSS layout hacks for internationalization & RTL\nTo prepare an LTR project to support RTL, developers have had to create all sorts of hacks. For example, the Drupal community started a convention of marking every margin-left and -right, every padding-left and -right, every float: left and float: right with the comment /* LTR */. Then later developers could search for each instance of that exact comment, and create stylesheets to override each left with right, and vice versa. It\u2019s a tedious and error prone way to work. CSS itself needed a better way to let web developers write their layout code once, and easily switch language directions with a single command.\nOur new CSS layout system does exactly that. Flexbox, Grid and Alignment use start and end instead of left and right. This lets us define everything in relationship to the writing system, and switch directions easily. By writing justify-content: flex-start, justify-items: end, and eventually margin-inline-start: 1rem we have code that doesn\u2019t need to be changed. \nThis is a much better way to work. I know it can be confusing to think through start and end as replacements for left and right. But it\u2019s better for any multiligual project, and it\u2019s better for the web as a whole.\nSadly, I\u2019ve seen CSS preprocessor tools that claim to \u201cfix\u201d the new CSS layout system by getting rid of start and end and bringing back left and right. They want you to use their tool, write justify-content: left, and feel self-righteous. It seems some folks think the new way of working is broken and should be discarded. It was created, however, to fulfill real needs. And to reflect a global internet. As Bruce Lawson says, WWW stands for the World Wide Web, not the Wealthy Western Web. Please don\u2019t try to convince the industry that there\u2019s something wrong with no longer being biased towards western culture. Instead, spread the word about why this new system is here. \nSpend a bit of time drilling the concept of inline and block into your head, and getting used to start and end. It will be second nature soon enough. \nI\u2019ve also seen CSS preprocessors that let us use this new way of thinking today, even as all the parts aren\u2019t fully supported by browsers yet. Some tools let you write text-align: start instead of text-align: left, and let the preprocessor handle things for you. That is terrific, in my opinion. A great use of the power of a preprocessor to help us switch over now. \nBut let\u2019s get back to RTL. \nHow to declare your direction\nYou don\u2019t want to use CSS to tell the browser to switch from an LTR language to RTL. You want to do this in your HTML. That way the browser has the information it needs to display the document even if the CSS doesn\u2019t load.\nThis is accomplished mainly on the html element. You should also declare your main language. As I mentioned above, the 24 ways website is using to declare the LTR direction and the use of British English. The UN Arabic website uses to declare the site as an Arabic site, using a RTL layout. \nThings get more complicated when you\u2019ve got a page with a mix of languages. But I\u2019m not going to get into all of that, since this article is focused on CSS and layouts, not explaining everything about internationalization. \nLet me just leave direction here by noting that much of the heavy work of laying out the characters which make up each word is handled by Unicode. If you are interested in learning more about LTR, RTL and bidirectional text, watch this video: Introduction to Bidirectional Text, a presentation by Elika Etemad. \nMeanwhile, let\u2019s get back to CSS.\nThe writing mode CSS for Latin-based and Arabic-based systems\nFor both of these systems\u2014Latin-based and Arabic-based, whether LTR or RTL\u2014the same CSS property applies for specifying the writing mode: writing-mode: horizontal-tb. That\u2019s because in both systems, the inline text flow is horizontal, while the block direction is top-to-bottom. This is expressed as horizontal-tb.\nhorizontal-tb is the default writing mode for the web, so you don\u2019t need to specify it unless you are overriding something else higher up in the cascade. You can just imagine that every site you\u2019ve ever built came with:\nhtml {\n writing-mode: horizontal-tb;\n}\nNow let\u2019s turn our attention to the vertical writing systems. \nHan-based systems\nThis is where things start to get interesting. \nHan-based writing systems include CJK languages, Chinese, Japanese, Korean and others. There are two options for laying out a page, and sometimes both are used at the same time.\nMuch of CJK text is laid out like Latin-based languages, with a horizontal top-to-bottom block direction, and a left-to-right inline direction. This is the more modern way to doing things, started in the 20th century in many places, and further pushed into domination by the computer and later the web. \nThe CSS to do this bit of the layouts is the same as above:\nsection {\n writing-mode: horizontal-tb;\n}\nOr, you know, do nothing, and get that result as a default. \nAlternatively Han-based languages can be laid out in a vertical writing mode, where the inline direction runs vertically, and the block direction goes from right to left. \nSee both options in this diagram:\n\nNote that the horizontal text flows from left to right, while the vertical text flows from right to left. Wild, eh? \nThis Japanese issue of Vogue magazine is using a mix of writing modes. The cover opens on the left spine, opposite of what an English magazine does. \n\nThis page mixes English and Japanese, and typesets the Japanese text in both horizontal and vertical modes. Under the title \u201cRichard Stark\u201d in red, you can see a passage that\u2019s horizontal-tb and LTR, while the longer passage of text at the bottom of the page is typeset vertical-rl. The red enlarged cap marks the beginning of that passage. The long headline above the vertical text is typeset LTR, horizontal-tb.\n\nThe details of how to set the default of the whole page will depend on your use case. But each element, each headline, each section, each article can be marked to flow the opposite of the default however you\u2019d like.\nFor example, perhaps you leave the default as horizontal-tb, and specify your vertical elements like this:\ndiv.articletext {\n writing-mode: vertical-rl;\n}\nOr alternatively you could change the default for the page to a vertical orientation, and then set specific elements to horizontal-tb, like this:\nhtml { \n writing-mode: vertical-rl;\n}\nh2, .photocaptions, section {\n writing-mode: horizontal-tb;\n}\nIf your page has a sideways scroll, then the writing mode will determine whether the page loads with upper left corner as the starting point, and scroll to the right (horizontal-tb as we are used to), or if the page loads with the upper right corner as the starting point, scrolling to the left to display overflow. Here\u2019s an example of that change in scrolling direction, in a CSS Writing Mode demo by Chen Hui Jing. Check out her demo \u2014 you can switch from horizontal to vertical writing modes with a checkbox and see the difference. \n\nMongolian-based systems\nNow, hopefully so far all of this kind of makes sense. It might be a bit more complicated than expected, but it\u2019s not so hard. Well, enter the Mongolian-based systems.\nMongolian is also a vertical script language. Text runs vertically down the page. Just like Han-based systems. There are two major differences. First, the block direction runs the other way. In Mongolian, block-level elements stack from left to right. \nHere\u2019s a drawing of how Wikipedia would look in Mongolian if it were laid out correctly.\nPerhaps the Mongolian version of Wikipedia will be redone with this layout.\nNow you might think, that doesn\u2019t look so weird. Tilt your head to the left, and it\u2019s very familiar. The block direction starts on the left side of the screen and goes to the right. The inline direction starts on the top of the page and moves to the bottom (similar to RTL text, just turned 90\u00b0 counter-clockwise). But here comes the other huge difference. The character direction is \u201cupside down\u201d. The top of the Mongolian characters are not pointing to the left, towards the start edge of the block direction. They point to the right. Like this:\n\nNow you might be tempted to ignore all this. Perhaps you don\u2019t expect to be typesetting Mongolian content anytime soon. But here\u2019s why this is important for everyone \u2014 the way Mongolian works defines the results writing-mode: vertical-lr. And it means we cannot use vertical-lr for typesetting content in other languages in the way we might otherwise expect. \nIf we took what we know about vertical-rl and guessed how vertical-lr works, we might imagine this:\n\nBut that\u2019s wrong. Here\u2019s how they actually compare:\n\nSee the unexpected situation? In both writing-mode: vertical-rl and writing-mode: vertical-lr latin text is rotated clockwise. Neither writing mode let\u2019s us rotate text counter-clockwise. \nIf you are typesetting Mongolian content, apply this CSS in the same way you would apply writing-mode to Han-based writing systems. To the whole page on the html element, or to specific pages of the page like this:\nsection {\n writing-mode: vertical-lr;\n}\nNow, if you are using writing-mode for a graphic design effect on a language that is otherwise typesets horizontally, I don\u2019t think writing-mode: vertical-lr is useful. If the text wraps onto two lines, it stacks in a very unexpected way. So I\u2019ve sort of obliterated it from my toolkit. I find myself using writing-mode: vertical-rl a lot. And never using -lr. Hm.\nWriting modes for graphic design\nSo how do we use writing-mode to turn English headlines sideways? We could rely on transform: rotate()\nHere are two examples, one for each direction. (By the way, each of these demos use CSS Grid for their overall layout, so be sure to test them in a browser that supports CSS Grid, like Firefox Nightly.)\n\nIn this demo 4A, the text is rotated clockwise using this code: \nh1 {\n writing-mode: vertical-rl;\n}\n\nIn this demo 4B, the text is rotated counter-clockwise using this code: \nh1 {\n writing-mode: vertical-rl;\n transform: rotate(180deg);\n text-align: right;\n}\nI use vertical-rl to rotate the text so that it takes up the proper amount of space in the overall flow of the layout. Then I rotate it 180\u00b0 to spin it around to the other direction. And then I use text-align: right to get it to rise up to the top of it\u2019s container. This feels like a hack, but it\u2019s a hack that works.\nNow what I would like to do instead is use another CSS value that was designed for this use case \u2014 one of the two other options for writing mode.\nIf I could, I would lay out example 4A with:\nh1 {\n writing-mode: sideways-rl;\n}\nAnd layout example 4B with: \nh1 {\n writing-mode: sideways-lr;\n}\nThe problem is that these two values are only supported in Firefox. None of the other browsers recognize sideways-*. Which means we can\u2019t really use it yet. \nIn general, the writing-mode property is very well supported across browsers. So I\u2019ll use writing-mode: vertical-rl for now, with the transform: rotate(180deg); hack to fake the other direction. \nThere\u2019s much more to what we can do with the CSS designed to support multiple languages, but I\u2019m going to stop with this intermediate introduction. \nIf you do want a bit more of a taste, look at this example that adds text-orientation: upright; to the mix \u2014 turning the individual letters of the latin font to be upright instead of sideways.\n\nIt\u2019s this demo 4C, with this CSS applied: \nh1 {\n writing-mode: vertical-rl;\n text-orientation: upright;\n text-transform: uppercase;\n letter-spacing: -25px;\n}\nYou can check out all my Writing Modes demos at labs.jensimmons.com/#writing-modes. \n\nI\u2019ll leave you with this last demo. One that applies a vertical writing mode to the sub headlines of a long article. I like how small details like this can really bring a fresh feeling to the content. \nSee the Pen Writing Mode Demo \u2014 Article Subheadlines by Jen Simmons (@jensimmons) on CodePen.", "year": "2016", "author": "Jen Simmons", "author_slug": "jensimmons", "published": "2016-12-23T00:00:00+00:00", "url": "https://24ways.org/2016/css-writing-modes/", "topic": "code"}
{"rowid": 311, "title": "Designing Imaginative Style Guides", "contents": "(Living) style guides and (atomic) patterns libraries are \u201call the rage,\u201d as my dear old Nana would\u2019ve said. If articles and conference talks are to be believed, making and using them has become incredibly popular. I think there are plenty of ways we can improve how style guides look and make them better at communicating design information to creatives without it getting in the way of information that technical people need.\nGuides to libraries of patterns\nMost of my consulting work and a good deal of my creative projects now involve designing style guides. I\u2019ve amassed a huge collection of brand guidelines and identity manuals as well as, more recently, guides to libraries of patterns intended to help designers and developers make digital products and websites.\nTwo pages from one of my Purposeful style guide packs. Designs \u00a9 Stuff & Nonsense.\n\u201cStyle guide\u201d is an umbrella term for several types of design documentation. Sometimes we\u2019re referring to static style or visual identity guides, other times voice and tone. We might mean front-end code guidelines or component/pattern libraries. These all offer something different but more often than not they have something in common. They look ugly enough to have been designed by someone who enjoys configuring a router.\nOK, that was mean, not everyone\u2019s going to think an unimaginative style guide design is a problem. After all, as long as a style guide contains information people need, how it looks shouldn\u2019t matter, should it?\nInspiring not encyclopaedic\nWell here\u2019s the thing. Not everyone needs to take the same information away from a style guide. If you\u2019re looking for markup and styles to code a \u2018media\u2019 component, you\u2019re probably going to be the technical type, whereas if you need to understand the balance of sizes across a typographic hierarchy, you\u2019re more likely to be a creative. What you need from a style guide is different.\nSure, some people1 need rules:\n\n\u201cDo this (responsive pattern)\u201d or \u201cdon\u2019t do that (auto-playing video.)\u201d \n\nThose people probably also want facts:\n\n\u201cUse this (hexadecimal value)\u201d and not that inaccessible colour combination.\u201d\n\nStyle guides need to do more than list facts and rules. They should demonstrate a design, not just document its parts. The best style guides are inspiring not encyclopaedic. I\u2019ll explain by showing how many style guides currently present information about colour. \nColours communicate\nI\u2019m sure you\u2019ll agree that alongside typography, colour\u2019s one of the most important ingredients in a design. Colour communicates personality, creates mood and is vital to an easily understandable interactive vocabulary. So you\u2019d think that an average style guide would describe all this in any number of imaginative ways. Well, you\u2019d be disappointed, because the most inspiring you\u2019ll find looks like a collection of chips from a paint chart.\n\nLonely Planet\u2019s Rizzo does a great job of separating its Design Elements from UI Components, and while its \u2018Click to copy\u2019\u00a0colour values are a thoughtful touch, you\u2019ll struggle to get a feeling for Lonely Planet\u2019s design by looking at their colour chips.\nLonely Planet\u2019s Rizzo style guide.\nLonely Planet approach is a common way to display colour information and it\u2019s one that you\u2019ll also find at Greenpeace, Sky, The Times and on countless more style guides.\n\n\n\n\n\nGreenpeace, Sky and The Times style guides.\nGOV.UK\u2014not a website known for its creative flair\u2014varies this approach by using circles, which I find strange as circles don\u2019t feature anywhere else in its branding or design. On the plus side though, their designers have provided some context by categorising colours by usage such as text, links, backgrounds and more.\nGOV.UK style guide.\nGoogle\u2019s Material Design offers an embarrassment of colours but most helpfully it also advises how to combine its primary and accent colours into usable palettes.\nGoogle\u2019s Material Design.\nWhile the ability to copy colour values from a reference might be all a technical person needs, designers need to understand why particular colours were chosen as well as how to use them. \nInspiration not documentation\nFew style guides offer any explanation and even less by way of inspiring examples. Most are extremely vague when they describe colour:\n\n\u201cUse colour as a presentation element for either decorative purposes or to convey information.\u201d\n\nThe Government of Canada\u2019s Web Experience Toolkit states, rather obviously.\n\n\u201cCertain colors have inherent meaning for a large majority of users, although we recognize that cultural differences are plentiful.\u201d\n\nSalesforce tell us, without actually mentioning any of those plentiful differences. \nI\u2019m also unsure what makes the Draft U.S. Web Design Standards colours a \u201cdistinctly American palette\u201d but it will have to work extremely hard to achieve its goal of communicating \u201cwarmth and trustworthiness\u201d now. \nIn Canada, \u201cbold and vibrant\u201d colours reflect Alberta\u2019s \u201cdiverse landscape.\u201d \nAdding more colours to their palette has made Adobe \u201crich, dynamic, and multi-dimensional\u201d and at Skype, colours are \u201cbold, colourful (obviously) and confident\u201d although their style guide doesn\u2019t actually provide information on how to use them.\nThe University of Oxford, on the other hand, is much more helpful by explaining how and why to use their colours:\n\n\u201cThe (dark) Oxford blue is used primarily in general page furniture such as the backgrounds on the header and footer. This makes for a strong brand presence throughout the site. Because it features so strongly in these areas, it is not recommended to use it in large areas elsewhere. However it is used more sparingly in smaller elements such as in event date icons and search/filtering bars.\u201d\n\nOpenTable style guide.\nThe designers at OpenTable have cleverly considered how to explain the hierarchy of their brand colours by presenting them and their supporting colours in various size chips. It\u2019s also obvious from OpenTable\u2019s design which colours are primary, supporting, accent or neutral without them having to say so.\nArt directing style guides\nFor the style guides I design for my clients, I go beyond simply documenting their colour palette and type styles and describe visually what these mean for them and their brand. I work to find distinctive ways to present colour to better represent the brand and also to inspire designers. \nFor example, on a recent project for SunLife, I described their palette of colours and how to use them across a series of art directed pages that reflect the lively personality of the SunLife brand. Information about HEX and RGB values, Sass variables and when to use their colours for branding, interaction and messaging is all there, but in a format that can appeal to both creative and technical people.\nSunLife style guide. Designs \u00a9 Stuff & Nonsense.\nPurposeful style guides\nIf you want to improve how you present colour information in your style guides, there\u2019s plenty you can do.\nFor a start, you needn\u2019t confine colour information to the palette page in your style guide. Find imaginative ways to display colour across several pages to show it in context with other parts of your design. Here are two CSS gradient filled \u2018cover\u2019 pages from my Purposeful style sheets.\nColour impacts other elements too, including typography, so make sure you include colour information on those pages, and vice-versa.\nPurposeful. Designs \u00a9 Stuff & Nonsense.\nA visual hierarchy can be easier to understand than labelling colours as \u2018primary,\u2019 \u2018supporting,\u2019 or \u2018accent,\u2019 so find creative ways to present that hierarchy. You might use panels of different sizes or arrange boxes on a modular grid to fill a page with colour.\nDon\u2019t limit yourself to rectangular colour chips, use circles or other shapes created using only CSS. If irregular shapes are a part of your brand, fill SVG silhouettes with CSS and then wrap text around them using CSS shapes. \nPurposeful. Designs \u00a9 Stuff & Nonsense.\nSumming up\nIn many ways I\u2019m as frustrated with style guide design as I am with the general state of design on the web. Style guides and pattern libraries needn\u2019t be dull in order to be functional. In fact, they\u2019re the perfect place for you to try out new ideas and technologies. There\u2019s nowhere better to experiment with new properties like CSS Grid than on your style guide.\nThe best style guide designs showcase new approaches and possibilities, and don\u2019t simply document the old ones. Be as creative with your style guide designs as you are with any public-facing part of your website.\n\nPurposeful are HTML and CSS style guides templates designed to help you develop creative style guides and pattern libraries for your business or clients. Save time while impressing your clients by using easily customisable HTML and CSS files that have been designed and coded to the highest standards. Twenty pages covering all common style guide components including colour, typography, buttons, form elements, and tables, plus popular pattern library components. Purposeful style guides will be available to buy online in January.\n\n\n\n\nBoring people\u00a0\u21a9", "year": "2016", "author": "Andy Clarke", "author_slug": "andyclarke", "published": "2016-12-13T00:00:00+00:00", "url": "https://24ways.org/2016/designing-imaginative-style-guides/", "topic": "design"}
{"rowid": 310, "title": "Fairytale of new Promise", "contents": "There are only four good Christmas songs.\nI know, yeah, JavaScript or whatever. We\u2019ll get to that in a minute, I promise.\nFirst\u2014and I cannot stress this enough\u2014 there are four good Christmas songs. You\u2019re free to disagree with me here, of course, but please try to understand that you will be wrong.\nThey don\u2019t all have the most safe-for-work titles; I can\u2019t list all of them here, but if you choose to let your fingers do the walkin\u2019 to your nearest search engine, I will say that one was released by the band FEAR way back in 1982 and one was on Run the Jewels\u2019 self-titled debut album. The lyrics are a hell of a lot worse than the titles, so maybe wait until you get home from work before you queue them up. Wear headphones, if you\u2019ve got thin walls.\nFor my money, though, the two I can reference by name are the top of that small heap: Tom Waits\u2019 Christmas Card from a Hooker in Minneapolis, and The Pogues\u2019 Fairytale of New York. The former once held the honor of being the only good Christmas song\u2014about which which I was also unequivocally correct, right up until I changed my mind. It\u2019s not the song up for discussion today, but feel free to familiarize yourself just the same\u2014I\u2019ll wait.\nFairytale of New York\u2014the top of the list\u2014starts out by hinting at some pretty standard holiday fare; dreams and cheer and whatnot. Typical seasonal stuff, so long as you ignore that the story seems to be recounted as a drunken flashback in a jail cell. You can probably make a few guesses at the underlying spirit of the song based on that framing: following a lucky break, our bright-eyed protagonists move to New York in search of fame and fortune, only to quickly descend into bad decisions, name-calling, and vaguely festive chaos.\nThis song speaks to me on a couple of levels, not the least of which is as a retelling of my day-to-day interactions with JavaScript. Each day\u2019s melody might vary a little bit, granted, but the lyrics almost always follow a pretty clear arc toward \u201cPARENTAL ADVISORY: EXPLICIT CONTENT.\u201d You might have heard a similar tune yourself; it goes a little somethin\u2019 like setTimeout(function() { console.log( \"this should be happening last\" ); }, 1000); . Callbacks are calling callbacks calling callbacks and something is happening somewhere, as the JavaScript interpreter plods through our code start-to-finish, line-by-line, step-by-step. If we need to take actions based on the results of something that could take its sweet time resolving, well, we\u2019d better fiddle with the order of things to make sure those actions don\u2019t happen too soon.\n\u201cBut I can see a better time,\u201d as the song says, \u201cwhen all our dreams come true.\u201d So, with that Pogues brand of holiday spirit squarely in mind\u2014by which I mean that your humble narrator is almost certainly drunk, and may be incarcerated at the time of publication\u2014gather \u2019round for a story of hope, of hardships, of semi-asynchronous JavaScript programming, and ultimately: of Promise unfulfilled.\nThe Main Thread\nJavaScript is single-minded, in a manner of speaking. Anything we tell the JavaScript runtime to do goes into a single-file queue; you\u2019ll see it referred to as the \u201cmain thread,\u201d or \u201cUI thread.\u201d That thread can be shared by a number of critical browser processes, like rendering and re-rendering parts of the page, and user interactions ranging from the simple\u2014say, highlighting text\u2014to the more complex\u2014interacting with form elements.\nIf that sounds a little scary to you, well, that\u2019s because it is. The more complex our scripts, the more we\u2019re cramming into that single-file main thread, to be processed along with\u2014say\u2014some of our CSS animations. Too much JavaScript clogging up the main thread means a lot of user-facing performance jankiness. Getting away from that single thread is a big part of all the excitement around Web Workers, which allow us to offload entire scripts into their own dedicated background threads\u2014though not without limitations of their own. Outside of Web Workers, that everything-thread is the only game in town: scripts executed one thing at a time, functions calling functions calling functions, taking numbers and crowding up the same deli counter as a user\u2019s interactions\u2014which, in this already strained metaphor, would be ham, I guess?\nAsynchronous JavaScript\nNow, those queued actions may include asynchronous things. For example: AJAX callbacks, setTimeout/setInterval, and addEventListener won\u2019t block the main thread while we\u2019re waiting for a request to come back, a timer to tick away, or an event to trigger. Once those things do kick in, though, the actions they\u2019re meant to perform will get shuffled right back into that single-thread queue.\nThere are a couple of places you might have written asynchronously-fired JavaScript, even if you\u2019re not super familiar with the overarching concept: XMLHttpRequest\u2014\u201cAJAX,\u201d if ya nasty\u2014or just kicking off a function once a user triggers a click or mouseenter event. Event-driven development is writ a little larger, with the overall flow of the script dictated by events, both internal and external. Writing event-driven JavaScript applications is a step in the right direction for sure\u2014it won\u2019t cure what ails the main thread, but it does work with the medium in a reasonable way. Event-driven development allows us to manage our use of the main thread in a way that makes sense. If any of this rings a bell for you, the motivation for Promises should feel familiar.\nFor example, a custom init event might kick things off, and fire a create event that applies our classes and restructures our markup which, on completion, fires a bindEvents event to handle all the event listeners for user interaction. There might not sound like much difference between that and one big function that kicks off, manipulates the DOM, and binds our events line-by-line\u2014but in a script of sufficient size and complexity we\u2019re not only provided with a decoupled flow through the script, but obvious touchpoints for future updates and a predictable structure for ongoing maintenance. \nThis pattern falls apart a little where we were still creating, binding, and listening for events in the same top-to-bottom, one-item-at-a-time way\u2014we had to set a listener on a given object before the event fires, or nothing would happen:\n// Create the event:\nvar event = document.createEvent( \"Event\" );\n\n// Name the event:\nevent.initEvent( \"doTheStuff\", true, true );\n\n// Listen for the custom `doTheStuff` event on `window`:\nwindow.addEventListener( \"doTheStuff\", initializeEverything );\n\n// Fire the custom event\nwindow.dispatchEvent( event );\nThis example is a little contrived, and this stuff is a lot more manageable for sure with the addition of a framework, but that\u2019s the basic gist: create and name the event, add a listener for the event, and\u2014after setting our listener\u2014dispatch the event.\nEvents and callbacks aren\u2019t the only game in town for weaving our way in and out of the main thread, though\u2014at least, not anymore. \nPromises\nA Promise is, at the risk of sounding sentimental, pure potential\u2014an empty container into which a value eventually results. A Promise can exist in several states: \u201cpending,\u201d while the computation they contain is being performed or \u201cresolved\u201d once that computation is complete. Once resolved, a Promise is \u201cfulfilled\u201d if it gave us back something we expect, or \u201crejected\u201d if it didn\u2019t.\nThe Promise constructor accepts a callback with two arguments: resolve and reject. We perform an action\u2014asynchronous or otherwise\u2014within that callback. If everything in there has gone according to plan, we call resolve. If something has gone awry, we call reject\u2014with an error, conventionally. To illustrate, let\u2019s tack something together with a pretty decent chance of doing what we don\u2019t want: a promise meant only to give us the number 1, but has a chance of giving us back a 2. No reasonable person would ever do this, of course, but I wouldn\u2019t necessarily put it past me.\nvar promisedOne = new Promise( function( resolve, reject ) {\n var coinToss = Math.floor( Math.random() * 2 ) + 1;\n\n if( coinToss === 1 ) {\n resolve( coinToss );\n } else {\n reject( new Error( \"That ain\u2019t a one.\" ) );\n }\n});\nThere\u2019s nothing too surprising in there, after you boil it all down. It\u2019s a little return-y, with the exception that we\u2019re flagging results as \u201cas expected\u201d or \u201csomething went wrong.\u201d\nTapping into that Promise uses another new keyword: then\u2014and as someone who attempts to make sense of JavaScript by breaking it down to plain ol\u2019 human-language, I\u2019m a big fan of this syntax. then is tacked onto our Promise identifier, and does just what it says on the tin: once the Promise is resolved, then do one of two things, both supplied as callbacks: the first in the case of a fulfilled promise, and the second in the case of a rejected one. Those two callbacks will have, as arguments, the results we specified with resolve orreject, respectively. It sounds like a lot in prose, but in code it\u2019s a pretty simple pattern:\npromisedOne.then( function( result ) {\n console.log( result );\n}, function( error ) {\n console.error( error );\n});\nIf you\u2019ve spent any time working with AJAX\u2014jQuery-wise, in particular\u2014you\u2019ve seen something like this pattern before: a success callback and an error callback. The state of a promise, once fulfilled or rejected, cannot be changed\u2014any reference we make to promisedOne will have a single, fixed result.\nIt may not look like too much the way I\u2019m using it here, but it\u2019s powerful stuff\u2014a pattern for asynchronously resolving anything. I\u2019ve recently used Promises alongside a script that emulates Font Load Events, to apply webfonts asynchronously and avoid a potential performance hit. Font Face Observer allows us to, as the name implies, determine when the files referenced by our @font-face rules have finished loading. \nvar fontObserver = new FontFaceObserver( \"Fancy Font\" );\n\nfontObserver.check().then(function() {\n document.documentElement.className += \" fonts-loaded\";\n}, function( error ) {\n console.error( error );\n});\nfontObserver.check() gives us back a Promise, allowing us to chain on a then containing our callbacks for success and failure. We use the fulfilled callback to bolt a class onto the page once the font file has been fully transferred. We don\u2019t bother including an argument in the first function, since we don\u2019t care about the result itself so much as we care that the promise resolved without error\u2014we\u2019re not doing anything with the resolved value, just adding a class to the page. We do include the error argument, since we\u2019ll want to know what happened should something go wrong.\nNow, this isn\u2019t the tidiest syntax around\u2014at least to my eyes\u2014with those two functions just kinda floating in a then. Luckily there\u2019s an similar alternative syntax; one that I find a bit easier to parse at-a-glance:\nfontObserver.check()\n .then(function() {\n document.documentElement.className += \" fonts-loaded\";\n })\n .catch(function( error ) {\n console.log( error );\n });\nThe first callback inside then provides us with our success state, while the catch provides us with a single, explicit \u201csomething went wrong\u201d callback. The two syntaxes aren\u2019t completely identical in all situations, but for a simple case like this, I find it a little neater.\nThe Common Thread\nI guess I still owe you an explanation, huh. Not about the JavaScript-whatever; I think I\u2019ve explained that plenty. No, I mean Fairytale of New York, and why it\u2019s perched up there at the top of the four (4) song heap.\nFairytale is a sad song, ostensibly. If you follow the main thread\u2014start to finish, line-by-line, step by step\u2014 Fairytale is a sad song. And I can see you out there, visions of Die Hard dancing in your heads: \u201cbut is it a Christmas song?\u201d\nWell, for my money, nothing says \u201cholidays\u201d quite like unreliable narration.\nShane MacGowan, the song\u2019s author, has placed the first verse about \u201cChristmas Eve in the drunk tank\u201d as happening right after the \u201clucky one, came in eighteen-to-one\u201d\u2014not at the chronological end of the story. That means the song might not be mostly drunken flashback, but all of it a single, overarching flashback including a Christmas Eve in protective custody. It could be that the man and woman are, together, recounting times long past\u2014good times and bad times\u2014maybe not even in chronological order. Hell, the \u201cNYPD Choir\u201d mentioned in the chorus? There\u2019s no such thing.\nWe\u2019re not big Christmas folks, my family and I. But just the same, every year, the handful of us get together, and every year\u2014like clockwork\u2014there\u2019s a lull in conversation, there\u2019s a sharp exhale, and Ma says \u201cwe all made it.\u201d Not to a house, not to a dinner, but through another year, to another Christmas. At this point, without fail, someone starts telling a story\u2014and one begets another, and so on. Sometimes the stories are happy, sometimes they\u2019re sad, more often than not they\u2019re both. Some are about things we were lucky to walk away from, some are about a time when another one of us didn\u2019t.\nStart-to-finish, line-by-line, step-by-step, the main thread through the year doesn\u2019t change, and maybe there isn\u2019t a whole lot we can do to change it. But by carefully weaving our way in and out of that thread\u2014stories all out of sync and resolving one way or the other, with the results determined by questionably reliable narrators\u2014we can change the way we interact with it and, little by little, we can start making sense of it.", "year": "2016", "author": "Mat Marquis", "author_slug": "matmarquis", "published": "2016-12-19T00:00:00+00:00", "url": "https://24ways.org/2016/fairytale-of-new-promise/", "topic": "code"}
{"rowid": 298, "title": "First Steps in VR", "contents": "The web is all around us. As web folk, it is our responsibility to consider the impact our work can have. Part of this includes thinking about the future; the web changes lives and if we are building the web then we are the ones making decisions that affect people in every corner of the world. I find myself often torn between wanting to make the right decisions, and just wanting to have fun. To fiddle and play. We all know how important it is to sometimes just try ideas, whether they will amount to much or not. \nI think of these two mindsets as production and prototyping, though of course there are lots of overlap and phases in between. I mention this because virtual reality is currently seen as a toy for rich people, and in some ways at the moment it is. But with WebVR we are able to create interesting experiences with a relatively low entry point. I want us to have open minds, play around with things, and then see how we can use the tools we have at our disposal to make things that will help people.\nEvery year we see articles saying it will be the \u201cyear of virtual reality\u201d, that was especially prevalent this year. 2016 has been a year of progress, VR isn\u2019t quite mainstream but with efforts like Playstation VR and Google Cardboard, we are definitely seeing much more of it. This year also saw the consumer editions of the Oculus Rift and HTC Vive. So it does seem to be a good time for an overview of how to get involved with creating virtual reality on the web.\nWebVR is an API for connecting to devices and retrieving continuous data such as the position and orientation. Unlike the Web Audio API and some other APIs, WebVR does not feel like a framework. You use it however you want, taking the data and using it as you wish. To make it easier, there are plenty of resources such as Three.js, A-Frame and ReactVR that help to make the heavy lifting a bit easier.\nGetting Started with A-Frame\nI like taking the opportunity to learn new things whenever I can. So while planning this article I thought that instead of trying to teach WebGL or even Three.js in a way that is approachable for all, I would create my first project using A-Frame and write about that. This is not a tutorial as such, I just want to show how to go about getting involved with VR. The beauty of A-Frame is that it is very similar to web components, you can just write HTML to build worlds that will automatically work on all the different types of devices. It uses WebGL and WebVR but in such a way that it quite drastically reduces the learning curve. That\u2019s not to say you can\u2019t build complex things, you have complete access to write JavaScript and shaders.\nI\u2019m lazy. Whenever I learn a new language or framework I have found that the best way, personally, for me to learn is to have a project and to copy the starting code from someone else. A project lets you have a good idea of what you want to produce and it means you can ignore a lot of the irrelevant documentation, focussing purely on what you need. That reduces the stress of figuring things out. Copying code also makes it easier, because you know your boilerplate code is working. There\u2019s nothing worse than getting stuck before anything actually works the first time. So I tinker. I take code and I modify it, I play around. It\u2019s fun.\nFor this project I wanted to keep things as simple as possible, so I can easily explain it without the classic \u201cdraw a circle then draw an owl\u201d. I wrote a list of requirements, with some stretch goals that you can give a try yourself if you fancy:\n\nMust work on Google Cardboard at a minimum, because of price\nTherefore, it must not rely on having a controller\nAuto-moving around a maze would be a good example\nMove in direction you look\nStretch goal: Scoring, time until you hit a wall or get stuck in maze\nStretch goal: Levels, so the map doesn\u2019t need to be random\nStretch goal: Snow!\n\nI decided to base this project on an example, Platforms, by Don McCurdy who wrote the really useful aframe-extras. Platforms has random 3D blocks that you can jump onto, going up into the sky. So I took his code and reduced it so that the blocks are randomly spread on the ground. \n\n\n\n \n \n 24 ways\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n\nAs you can see, this is very readable. Especially if you ignore the JavaScript that is used to create the maze. A-Frame (with A-Frame Extras) gives you a lot of power with relatively little to learn. We start with an which is the container for everything that is going to show up on the screen. There are a few which can be compared to
as they are essentially non-semantic containers, able to be used for any purpose. The attributes are used to define functionality, for example the camera attribute sets the entity to function as a camera and kinematic-body makes it collide instead of go through objects. Attributes are also used to set position and sizes, often using JavaScript to dynamically define them.\nStyling\nNow we\u2019ve got the HTML written, we need to style it. To do this we add A-Frame compatible attributes such as color and material. I recommend playing around, you can get some quite impressive effects fairly easily. Originally I wanted a light snowy maze but it ended up being dark and foggy, as I really liked the feeling it gave.\nNote, you will probably need a server running for images to work. You can do this by running python -m \"SimpleHTTPServer\" in the folder where the code is, then go to localhost:8000 in browser.\nTextures\nUnless you are going for a cartoony style, you probably want to find some textures. I found some on textures.com, one image worked well for the walls and the other for the floor.\n\n \n \n\nThe is used to define (as well as preload and cache) all assets, including images, audio and video. As you can see, images in the Asset Management System just use normal img tags. The ids are important here as we can use them later for using the textures. \nTo apply a texture to an object, you create a material. For a simple material where it just shows the image, you set the src to the id selector of the image.\nReplace: \n\nWith:\n\nThis will automatically make the image repeat over the entire floor, in my case filling it with bricks. The walls are pretty much identical, with the slight exception that it is set in JavaScript as they are dynamically defined.\nbox.setAttribute('material', 'src: #texture-wall');\nThat\u2019s it for the textures, for now at least. These will not look completely realistic, as the light will bump off the rectangular wall rather than texture itself. This can be improved by using maps, textures that are used to modify the shape and physical properties of the object. \nLighting\nThe next part of styling is lighting. By using fog and different types of lighting, we are able to add atmospheric details to the game to make it feel that bit more realistic and polished.\nThere are lots of types of light in A-Frame (most coming from Three.js). You can add a light either by using the entity or by attaching a light attribute to any other entity. If there are no lights defined then A-Frame adds some by default so that the scene is always lit.\nTo start with I wanted to light up the scene with a general light, type=\"ambient\", so that the whole game felt slightly dark. I chose to set the light to a reddish colour #92455E. After playing around with intensity I chose 0.4, it added enough light to get the feeling I wanted without it being overly red. I also added a blue skybox (), as it looked a bit odd with a white sky.\n\n\nI felt that the maze looked good with a red tinge but it was a bit flat, everything was the same colour and it was a bit dark. So I added a light within the #player entity, this could have been as an attribute but I set it as a child a-light instead. By using type=\"point\" with a high intensity and low distance, it showed close walls as being lighter. It also added a sort-of object to the player, it isn\u2019t a walking human or anything but by moving light where the player is it feels a bit more physical.\n\n\nBy this point it was starting to look decent, so I wanted to add the fog to really give some personality and depth to the maze. To do this I added the fog attribute to the with type=exponential so it looks thicker the further away it is and a mid intensity, so you feel a bit lost but can still see.\n\nI was very happy with this result. It took a lot of playing around with colours and values, which is fun in itself. I highly recommend you take the code (or write your own) and play around with the numbers.\nMovement\nOne of the reasons I decided to use aframe-extras is that it has a few different camera controls built in. As you saw earlier, I am using the universal-controls which gives WASD (keyboard) controls by default. I wanted to make it automatically move in the direction that you\u2019re looking, but I wasn\u2019t quite sure how without rewriting the controls. So I asked Don McCurdy for advice and he very nicely gave me a small snippet of code to get it working.\nAFRAME.registerComponent('automove-controls', {\n init: function () {\n this.speed = 0.1;\n this.isMoving = true;\n this.velocityDelta = new THREE.Vector3();\n },\n isVelocityActive: function () {\n return this.isMoving;\n },\n getVelocityDelta: function () {\n this.velocityDelta.z = this.isMoving ? -speed : 0;\n return this.velocityDelta.clone();\n }\n});\nReplace:\nuniversal-controls\nWith:\nuniversal-controls=\"movementControls: automove, gamepad, keyboard\"\nThis works by creating a component automove-controls that adds auto-move to the player without overriding movement completely. It doesn\u2019t even touch direction, it just checks if isMoving is true then moves the player by the set speed. Components can be creating for adding all kinds of functionality with relative ease. It makes it very powerful for people of all difficulty levels.\nBuilding a map\nCurrently the maze is created randomly, which is great but means there will often be walls that overlap or the player gets trapped with nowhere to go. So to solve this, I decided to use a map editor (Tiled) so that we can create the mazes ourselves. This is a great start towards one of the stretch goals, levels.\nI made the maze in Tiled by finding a random tileset online (we don\u2019t need to actually show the images), I used one tile for the wall and another for the player. Then I exported as a JavaScript file and modified it in my text editor to get rid of everything I didn\u2019t need. I made it so 0 is the path, 1 is the wall and 2 is the player. I then added the script to the HTML, as a separate file so it\u2019s easy to update in the future. \nvar map =\n{\n \"data\":[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1],\n \"height\":10,\n \"width\":10\n}\n\nAs you can see, this gives a simple 10x10 maze with some dead ends. The player starts in the bottom right corner (my choice, could be anywhere). I rewrote the random platforms code (from Don\u2019s example) to instead loop over the map data and place walls where it is 1 and position the player where data is 2. I set the position so that the origin of the map would be 0,1.5,0. The y axis is in this case the height (ground being 0), but if a wall is positioned at 0 by its centre then some of it is underground. So the y needed to be the height divided by 2.\ndocument.querySelector('a-scene').addEventListener('render-target-loaded', function () {\n var WALL_SIZE = 5,\n WALL_HEIGHT = 3;\n var el = document.querySelector('#walls');\n var wall;\n\n for (var x = 0; x < map.height; x++) {\n for (var y = 0; y < map.width; y++) {\n\n var i = y*map.width + x;\n var position = (x-map.width/2)*WALL_SIZE + ' ' + 1.5 + ' ' + (y-map.height/2)*WALL_SIZE;\n if (map.data[i] === 1) {\n // Create wall\n wall = document.createElement('a-box');\n el.appendChild(wall);\n wall.setAttribute('color', '#fff');\n wall.setAttribute('material', 'src: #texture-wall;');\n wall.setAttribute('width', WALL_SIZE);\n wall.setAttribute('height', WALL_HEIGHT);\n wall.setAttribute('depth', WALL_SIZE);\n wall.setAttribute('position', position);\n wall.setAttribute('static-body', ');\n }\n\n if (map.data[i] === 2) {\n // Set player position\n document.querySelector('#player').setAttribute('position', position);\n }\n\n }\n }\n console.info('Walls added.');\n});\n\nWith this added, it makes it nice and easy to change around the map as well as to add new features. Perhaps you want monsters or objects. Just set the number in the map data and add an if statement to the loop. In the future you could add layers, so multiple things can be in the same position. Or perhaps even make the maze go up the y axis too, with ramps or staircases. There\u2019s a lot you can do with relative ease. As you can see, A-Frame really does reduce the learning curve of 3D and VR on the web.\nIt\u2019s Not All Fun And Games\nA lot of examples of virtual reality are games, including this one. So it is understandable to think that VR is for gaming, but actually that\u2019s just a tiny subset. There are all sorts of applications for VR, including story telling, data visualisation and even meditation.\nThere have been a number of cases where it has been shown virtual reality can help as a tool for therapies:\n\nOxford study finds virtual reality can help treat severe paranoia\nVirtual Reality Therapy for Phobias at the Duke Faculty Practice\nBravemind: Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy at the University of Southern California\n\nThese are just a few examples of where virtual reality is being used around the world to help people feel better and get through some very tough times. There have also been examples of it being used for simulating war zones or medical situations, both as a teaching and journalism tool.\nWrapping Up\nTen years ago, on this very site, Cameron Moll wrote an article explaining the mobile web. He explained how mobile phones with data plans were becoming increasingly common, that WAP 2.0 included the XHTML Mobile Profile meaning it would be familiar with web folk. \u201cThe mobile web is rapidly becoming an XHTML environment, and thus you and I can apply our existing \u201cdesktop web\u201d skills to understand how to develop content for it.\u201d\nWe can look at that and laugh a little, we have come a very long way in the last decade. Even people in developing countries with very little money have mobile phones with access to a web that is far more capable than the \u201cdesktop web\u201d Cameron was referring to.\nSo while I am not saying virtual reality is going to change the world or replace our phones, who knows! We can use our skills as web folk to dabble, we don\u2019t need to learn any new languages. If on the 2026 edition of 24 ways, somebody references this article and looks at how far we have come\u2026 well, let\u2019s hope we have used our skills well and made the world just that little bit better. And if VR is a fad? Well it\u2019s fun\u2026 have a go anyway.", "year": "2016", "author": "Shane Hudson", "author_slug": "shanehudson", "published": "2016-12-11T00:00:00+00:00", "url": "https://24ways.org/2016/first-steps-in-vr/", "topic": "code"}
{"rowid": 302, "title": "Flexible Project Management in Inflexible Environments", "contents": "Handling unforeseen circumstances is an inevitable part of any project. It\u2019s also often the most uncomfortable, and there is no amount of skill or planning that will fully eradicate the need to adapt to change. The ability to be flexible, responsive, and unafraid of facing not only problems, but also potentially positive scope changes and new ideas, isn\u2019t an easy one to master. I am by no means saying that I have, but what I have learned is that there is often the temptation to shut out anything that might derail your plan, even sometimes at the cost of the quality you\u2019re committed to.\nThe reality is that as someone leading a project you know there will be challenges, but, in general, it\u2019s a hassle to try keep the landscape open. Problems are bridges we should cross when we come to them, but intentional changes to the plan, and adapting for the sake of improving your first idea, is harder. There are tight schedules, resource is planned miles ahead, and you\u2019re already juggling twenty other things. If you\u2019re passionate about the quality of work you deliver and are working somewhere that considers itself expert within the field of digital, then having an attitude of flexibility is extremely important. It\u2019s important when you\u2019re overcoming a challenge or problem, but it\u2019s also important for allowing ideas to evolve and be refined as much as they can be throughout the course of a project.\nWhere theory falls short\nThe premise of any Agile methodology, Scrum for example, is based around being able to work efficiently, react quickly and deliver relevant chunks of a product in manageable increments. It\u2019s often hailed as king of flexible management and it can work really well, especially for in-house software products developed over a long or even an indefinite period of time. It holds off defining scope too far ahead and lets teams focus on smaller amounts of work, and allows them to regularly reprioritise. Unfortunately though, not all environments lend themselves as easily to a fully Agile setup. Even the ones that do may be restrained from putting it fully into practice for an array of other internal reasons.\nDelivering digital services to clients\u2014within an agency setting or as a freelancer\u2014often demands a more rigid structure. You need clear sign-off points, there\u2019s a lot less flexibility in defining features, or working within budgets and timeframes. To start with, for a project to warrant a fully Agile team working on it, and especially for agencies, you need clients big enough and rich enough to justify the resource. You also need a lot of client trust to propose defining features and scope as you go. Although this is achievable\u2014and there are agencies that operate an agile setup\u2014it takes a long journey to reach that scale in the full sense of the word. Building a reputation that commands unconditional trust and reaching the point where your projects are consistently of a certain size often requires backing by long journey of success and excellence.\nSo there is a lot of room left for understanding how we can best strive to still deliver excellent projects within more constrained structures. We know that rigid waterfall planning, more often than not, falls over as soon as a project gets anything past a basic brochure site. There are many critiques of the system, but one of the main ones tends to be that nobody considers each other\u2019s work properly, which can result in very expensive and inefficient development.\nEqually, for reasons we\u2019ve already touched upon, running fully agile teams often isn\u2019t the right answer. So many companies, individuals, and organisations look for a middle-ground that balances being flexible and adaptive, but also provides enough upfront commitment to agree budgets, get client/stakeholder sign off, and effectively coordinate internal resource across multiple parallel projects.\nAlthough I don\u2019t have a perfect formula\u2014and can very much assert there is no one perfect way of managing a project because every project is different to the next\u2014I\u2019ve identified a few different ways you can approach flexibility that have really helped me in running projects more smoothly within more realistic constraints.\nPlanned Flexibility\nDrawing on some of the traditional methodologies such as PRINCE2, a good starting point for aspiring to be flexible is by planning for it from the start.\nPlanning flexibility comes in a few forms. For one, you can regularly identify and log potential risks as a generally good, on-going habit over the course of the project. This essentially just involves scanning the horizon for potential blips on a regular basis (for example weekly) by consulting with your team and documenting it somewhere. It means you have a checkpoint when you sit down and make sure you\u2019re minimising what will or may catch you by surprise. A good time to do this is in a weekly catch up meeting. It\u2019s not going to fix all your problems, but it will make sure you have a head start on the ones you can see coming.\nOn the subject of team meetings, setting up recurring project events, including a weekly call, a weekly team meeting and (depending on the size of the project) I like to try also do a stand-up as often as possible. Keeping everyone involved and bought in to a project is going to help you infinitely when you need to spot a problem or manage changes to the plan. It will be the difference between your designer spotting an issue and making a mental note to \u2018tell you later\u2019, and them actually coming over to tell you directly and immediately. Despite the overhead of meetings, and looping people into stages that they aren\u2019t directly responsible for, the business benefits are chances for success are drastically increased. Planning in, and being aware of how important your team is, will help you be flexible.\nBuilding contingency (formally know as slack) into your project plan from the word go is another well-known and essential way of planning to be flexible. Your project plan will change a lot over the course of a project, but there are still the days that you estimate a job will take, and the days you should actually plan in. Most sensible management teams understand that budgets need to be agreed with this slack in mind or you will not be able to deliver a quality service. I believe that commercial awareness is one of the most valuable skills a project manager can have, but penny pinching will ruin client and team relationships, destroy buy-in and creativity, and often end you up with a much more expensive, hacky, and resented product.\nIt\u2019s not a justification to let budgets spiral out of control, but a way of thinking about the bigger picture and wider plan of the company itself. It\u2019s unlikely you want high staff turnover because everyone fell out while you were screaming money at them and they didn\u2019t feel like they could do a good job. It\u2019s also unlikely that you will be able to deliver quality products, which will win you a strong reputation and subsequently bigger and better projects. Evaluating risk factors and building in the right amount of slack from the start will give you more wriggle room when you need to adapt and react. On the flip side, also keeping an overview of the wider workload (that you\u2019re not necessarily responsible for), and knowing who to talk if resource is becoming free or needs filling, is another handy way of being able to react quickly and ensuring your management system is respected. You want pockets of backup time planned in, but you also want everyone being as productive as they can most of the time. Never run at 100% capacity: as soon as something does need to change, you\u2019re left with nowhere to move.\nTransparency\nHaving a client or stakeholder that trusts you is a really powerful aid in any regard, but especially so when you need to communicate an issue or new suggestion. Positioning yourself and your team as experts and taking the time to delve into the wider picture\u2014and the goals surrounding your client\u2019s reasons to commission the project in the first place\u2014will make you more valuable to them. Clients and stakeholders will always be different, and sometimes you will get people who are just plain difficult, but more often than not people will listen if you\u2019re willing to talk and explain things.\nAs I\u2019m sure all of us have realised at one point or another, a lot of people think they know what they want, and it\u2019s usually the wrong thing. Managing key stakeholders in your project is arguably your biggest challenge, if they are on the your side and feel like the team is genuinely working to give them something of quality and value, then they will make your job easier. It\u2019s often down to you to educate them, and to help them recognise and understand the work involved and you and your team\u2019s reasoning behind your decisions.\nBeing overly submissive or overly secretive will foster a dynamic in which they feel expected to steer the project. In this situation they may not respect the team\u2019s suggestions or may come up with some unreasonable and counterproductive ideas that are likely to hinder progress and lower morale. Getting the stakeholder on board and making them feel a part of the wider picture will make things easier. Pushing back and challenging ideas or working hard to justify something they don\u2019t quite understand will often work in your favour and protects your team. On quite a basic level it also shows you care and are invested; on another, it shows you feel confident in your expertise within your field and that is ultimately the reason they hired you.\nTaking the time to think about and be aware of this relationship, will make it easier to be flexible and handle new ideas or suggestions that pop up as the project goes along. Change doesn\u2019t need to be \u2018scope creep\u2019 if it\u2019s raised in a practical, value-orientated, and level headed discussion. There is usually a way forward for new ideas, as long as they\u2019re valuable and support the wider goals. Maybe the deadline gets pushed back, maybe you get more budget, maybe the client is happy to forgo something else. As long as there\u2019s value and reason, it shows integrity to the project and respect for its success. You can\u2019t expect for this to go smoothly without having invested in the client relationship, so it\u2019s a large point in paving the way to handling change well.\nReactive Flexibility\nFinally, if you\u2019ve been doing this for a while, you\u2019ll know by now that you can\u2019t anticipate everything. Sometimes you will have to react and change the plan under circumstances that aren\u2019t easy. When an unexpected problem first rears its head\u2014a client\u2019s casual afterthought that\u2019s threatening the scope of the project, an internal resource conflict, a junior member of staff that\u2019s not grasping the ropes quite as quickly as you\u2019d hoped\u2014you have to react quickly.\nIn his book, \u2018Pitch Anything\u2019, Oren Klaff talks about people\u2019s first reactions being processed by their \u2018crocodile brain\u2019 before they\u2019ve had a chance to refine and digest the information more intelligibly. As project managers, product owners, or scrum masters, it\u2019s natural for our immediate reactions to an unexpected problem to cause a pang of stress. But after that initial jolt you need to turn to practical solutions and start racking your brain for different ways forward. It\u2019s here you need to remember to not let your imagination get the better of you, especially if you\u2019ve been putting in the legwork with your team and your client. There is always a way forward and moments like this can be a good opportunity to develop your negotiation and diplomacy skills. Don\u2019t let your immediate reaction be shutting the problem down; instead, take a second to think about it before you decide on the best direction. In a stressful situation, your first idea probably won\u2019t be your best one.\nFrom an internal point of view, it\u2019s very important that whatever went wrong doesn\u2019t turn into a finger pointing exercise and you don\u2019t lose your cool. Getting caught up in a blame game or a witch hunt is never productive. Relationship cultivating can sometimes be the pillar that gets you through a stressful blip. Biggest tip for staying flexible when you\u2019re reacting to a problem\u2014apart form obviously thinking of ways forward\u2014is to communicate. Don\u2019t go quiet until you feel like you have a plan, you\u2019ll often need to put everyone else at ease before you can move things forward. Problem solving is part of the job and will need to happen in even the most flexible of product delivery systems.\nIn conclusion, being flexible is never simple but there are things you can do to make your life easier. Owning a position of expertise, putting together a team that\u2019s involved in each other\u2019s work and cultivating a client/stakeholder relationship that\u2019s as transparent and respectful as possible will get you a long way. In times of crisis, believe in your skills and be open to adapting over getting frustrated.", "year": "2016", "author": "Gillian Sibthorpe", "author_slug": "gilliansibthorpe", "published": "2016-12-04T00:00:00+00:00", "url": "https://24ways.org/2016/flexible-project-management/", "topic": "process"}
{"rowid": 289, "title": "Front-End Developers Are Information Architects Too", "contents": "The theme of this year\u2019s World IA Day was \u201cInformation Everywhere, Architects Everywhere\u201d. This article isn\u2019t about what you may consider an information architect to be: someone in the user-experience field, who maybe studied library science, and who talks about taxonomies. This is about a realisation I had a couple of years ago when I started to run an increasing amount of usability-testing sessions with people who have disabilities: that the structure, labelling, and connections that can be made in front-end code is information architecture. People\u2019s ability to be successful online is unequivocally connected to the quality of the code that is written.\nPlaces made of information\nIn information architecture we talk about creating places made of information. These places are made of ones and zeros, but we talk about them as physical structures. We talk about going onto a social media platform, posting in blogs, getting locked out of an environment, and building applications. In 2002, Andrew Hinton stated:\n\nPeople live and work in these structures, just as they live and work in their homes, offices, factories and malls. These places are not virtual: they are as real as our own minds.\n25 Theses\n\nWe\u2019re creating structures which people rely on for significant parts of their lives, so it\u2019s critical that we carry out our work responsibly. This means we must use our construction materials correctly. Luckily, our most important material, HTML, has a well-documented specification which tells us how to build robust and accessible places. What is most important, I believe, is to understand the semantics of HTML.\nSemantics\nThe word \u201csemantic\u201d has its origin in Greek words meaning \u201csignificant\u201d, \u201csignify\u201d, and \u201csign\u201d. In the physical world, a structure can have semantic qualities that tell us something about it. For example, the stunning Westminster Abbey inspires awe and signifies much about the intent and purpose of the structure. The building\u2019s size; the quality of the stone work; the massive, detailed stained glass: these are all signs that this is a building meant for something the creators deemed important. Alternatively consider a set of large, clean, well-positioned, well-lit doors on the ground floor of an office block: they don\u2019t need an \u201centrance\u201d sign to communicate their use and to stop people trying to use a nearby fire exit to get into the building. The design of the doors signify their usage. Sometimes a more literal and less awe-inspiring approach to communicating a building\u2019s purpose happens, but the affect is similar: the building is signifying something about its purpose.\nHTML has over 115 elements, many of which have semantics to signify structure and affordance to people, browsers, and assistive technology. The HTML 5.1 specification mentions semantics, stating:\n\nElements, attributes, and attribute values in HTML are defined \u2026 to have certain meanings (semantics). For example, the element represents an ordered list, and the lang attribute represents the language of the content.\nHTML 5.1 Semantics, structure, and APIs of HTML documents\n\nHTML\u2019s baked-in semantics means that developers can architect their code to signify structure, create relationships between elements, and label content so people can understand what they\u2019re interacting with. Structuring and labelling information to make it available, usable, and understandable to people is what an information architect does. It\u2019s also what a front-end developer does, whether they realise it or not.\nA brief introduction to information architecture\nWe\u2019re going to start by looking at what an information architect is. There are many definitions, and I\u2019m going to quote Richard Saul Wurman, who is widely regarded as the father of information architecture. In 1976 he said an information architect is:\n\nthe individual who organizes the patterns inherent in data, making the complex clear; a person who creates the structure or map of information which allows others to find their personal paths to knowledge; the emerging 21st century professional occupation addressing the needs of the age focused upon clarity, human understanding, and the science of the organization of information.\nOf Patterns And Structures\n\nTo me, this clearly defines any developer who creates code that a browser, or other user agent (for example, a screen reader), uses to create a structured, navigable place for people.\nJust as there are many definitions of what an information architect is, there are for information architecture itself. I\u2019m going to use the definition from the fourth edition of Information Architecture For The World Wide Web, in which the authors define it as:\nThe structural design of shared information environments.\nThe synthesis of organization, labeling, search, and navigation systems within digital, physical, and cross-channel ecosystems.\nThe art and science of shaping information products and experiences to support usability, findability, and understanding.\nInformation Architecture For The World Wide Web, 4th Edition\nTo me, this describes front-end development. Done properly, there is an art to creating robust, accessible, usable, and findable spaces that delight all our users. For example, at 2015\u2019s State Of The Browser conference, Edd Sowden talked about the accessibility of
s. He discovered that by simply not using the semantically-correct
element to mark up
headings, in some situations browsers will decide that a
is being used for layout and essentially make it invisible to assistive technology. Another example of how coding practices can affect the usability and findability of content is shown by L\u00e9onie Watson in her How ARIA landmark roles help screen reader users video. By using ARIA landmark roles, people who use screen readers are quickly able to identify and jump to common parts of a web page.\nOur definitions of information architects and information architecture mention patterns, rules, organisation, labelling, structure, and relationships. There are numerous different models for how these elements get boiled down to their fundamentals. In his Understanding Context book, Andrew Hinton calls them Labels, Relationships, and Rules; Jorge Arango calls them Links, Nodes, And Order; and Dan Klyn uses Ontology, Taxonomy, and Choreography, which is the one we\u2019re going to use. Dan defines these terms as:\nOntology\nThe definition and articulation of the rules and patterns that govern the meaning of what we intend to communicate.\nWhat we mean when we say what we say.\nTaxonomy\nThe arrangements of the parts. Developing systems and structures for what everything\u2019s called, where everything\u2019s sorted, and the relationships between labels and categories\nChoreography\nRules for interaction among the parts. The structures it creates foster specific types of movement and interaction; anticipating the way users and information want to flow and making affordance for change over time.\n\nWe now have definitions of an information architect, information architecture, and a model of the elements of information architecture. But is writing HTML really creating information or is it just wrangling data and metadata? When does data turn into information? In his book Managing For The Future Peter Drucker states:\n\n\u2026 data is not information. Information is data endowed with relevance and purpose.\nManaging For The Future\n\nIf we use the correct semantic element to mark up content then we\u2019re developing with purpose and creating relevance. For example, if we follow the advice of the HTML 5.1 specification and mark up headings using heading rank instead of the outline algorithm, we\u2019re creating a structure where the depth of one heading is relevant to the previous one. Architected correctly, an
element should be relevant to its parent, which should be the
. By following the HTML specification we can create a structured, searchable, labeled document that will hopefully be relevant to what our users need to be successful. If you\u2019ve never used a screen reader, you might be wondering how the headings on a page are searchable. Screen readers give users the ability to interact with headings in a couple of ways:\n\nby creating a list of headings so users can quickly scan the page for information\nby using a keyboard command to cycle through one heading at a time\n\nIf we had a document for Christmas Day TV we might structure it something like this:\n
Christmas Day TV schedule
\n
BBC1
\n
Morning
\n
Evening
\n
BBC2
\n
Morning
\n
Evening
\n
ITV
\n
Morning
\n
Evening
\n
Channel 4
\n
Morning
\n
Evening
\nIf I use VoiceOver to generate a list of headings, I get this:\n\nOnce I have that list I can use keyboard commands to filter the list based on the heading level. For example, I can press 2 to hear just the
s:\n\nIf we hadn\u2019t used headings, of if we\u2019d nested them incorrectly, our users would be frustrated.\nPutting this together\nLet\u2019s put this together with an example of a button that, when pressed, toggles the appearance of a panel of links. There are numerous ways we could create a button on a web page, but the best way is to just use a
![](\"floor.jpg\")
\n ![](\"wall.jpg\")
\n