. This is also inaccessible because a screenreader will not pause between adjacent links, and in some configurations will not announce the individual links, but rather all of the tags will be read as just one link containing a whole bunch of words. Markup crime number one. \n\nFlickr \n\nAh, Flickr. The darling photo sharing site of the internet, and the biggest blind spot in every standardista\u2019s vision. Forgive it for having atrocious markup and sometimes confusing UI because it\u2019s just so much damn fun to use. Let\u2019s see what they do. \n\n
\n\t\u00a006\u00a0\n\t\u00a0africa\u00a0\n\t\u00a0amsterdam\u00a0\n\t...\n
\n\nAgain we have a simple collection of anchors like del.icio.us, only this time in a paragraph. But rather than using a class to represent the size of the tag they use an inline style. An inline style using a pixel-based font size. That\u2019s so far away from the goal of separating style from content, they might as well use a
tag. You could theoretically parse that to extract the information, but you have more work to guess what the pixel sizes represent. Markup crime number two (and extra jail time for using non-breaking spaces purely for visual spacing purposes.)\n\nTechnorati \n\nAh, now. Here, you\u2019d expect something decent. After all, the Overlord of microformats and King of Semantics Tantek \u00c7elik works there. Surely we\u2019ll see something decent here? \n\n\n\t- Britney Spears
\n\t- Bush
\n\t- Christmas
\n\t...\n\t- SEO
\n\t- Shopping
\n\t...\n
\n\nUnfortunately it turns out not to be that decent, and stop calling me Shirley. It\u2019s not exactly terrible code. It does recognise that a tag cloud is a list of links. And, since they\u2019re in alphabetical order, that it\u2019s an ordered list of links. That\u2019s nice. However \u2026 fifteen nested tags? FIFTEEN? That\u2019s emphasis for you. Yes, it is parse-able, but it\u2019s also something of a strange way of looking at emphasis. The HTML spec states that is emphasis, and is for stronger emphasis. Nesting tags seems counter to the idea that different tags are used for different levels of emphasis. Plus, if you had a screen reader that stressed the voice for emphasis, what would it do? Shout at you? Markup crime number three. \n\nSo what should it be? \n\nAs del.icio.us tells us, a tag cloud is a list of tags where the size that they are rendered at contains extra information. However, by hiding the extra context purely within the CSS or the HTML tags used, you are denying that context to some users. The basic assumption being made is that all users will be able to see the difference between font sizes, and this is demonstrably false. \n\nA better way to code a tag cloud is to put the context of the cloud within the content, not the markup or CSS alone. As an example, I\u2019m going to take some of my favourite flickr tags and put them into a cloud which communicates the relative frequency of each tag. \n\nTo start with a tag cloud in its most basic form is just a list of links. I am going to present them in alphabetical order, so I\u2019ll use an ordered list. Into each list item I add the number of photos I have with that particular tag. The tag itself is linked to the page on flickr which contains those photos. So we end up with this first example. To display this as a traditional tag cloud, we need to alter it in a few ways: \n\n\n\tThe items need to be displayed next to each other, rather than one-per-line\n\tThe context information should be hidden from display (but not from screen readers)\n\tThe tag should link to the page of items with that tag\n\n\nDisplaying the items next to each other simply means setting the display of the list elements to inline. The context can be hidden by wrapping it in a and then using the off-left method to hide it. And the link just means adding an anchor (with rel=\"tag\" for some extra microformats bonus points). So, now we have a simple collection of links in our second example. \n\nThe last stage is to add the sizes. Since we already have context in our content, the size is purely for visual rendering, so we can just use classes to define the different sizes. For my example, I\u2019ll use a range of class names from not-popular through ultra-popular, in order of smallest to largest, and then use CSS to define different font sizes. If you preferred, you could always use less verbose class names such as size1 through size6. Anyway, adding some classes and CSS gives us our final example, a semantic and more accessible tag cloud.", "year": "2006", "author": "Mark Norman Francis", "author_slug": "marknormanfrancis", "published": "2006-12-09T00:00:00+00:00", "url": "https://24ways.org/2006/marking-up-a-tag-cloud/", "topic": "code"}
{"rowid": 164, "title": "My Other Christmas Present Is a Definition List", "contents": "A note from the editors: readers should note that the HTML5 redefinition of definition lists has come to pass and is now \u00e0 la mode.\n \n \n \n Last year, I looked at how the markup for tag clouds was generally terrible. I thought this year I would look not at a method of marking up a common module, but instead just at a simple part of HTML and how it generally gets abused.\n\nNo, not tables. Definition lists. Ah, definition lists. Often used but rarely understood.\n\nExamining the definition of definitions\n\nTo start with, let\u2019s see what the HTML spec has to say about them.\n\n\n\tDefinition lists vary only slightly from other types of lists in that list items consist of two parts: a term and a description.\n\n\nThe canonical example of a definition list is a dictionary. Words can have multiple descriptions (even the word definition has at least five). Also, many terms can share a single definition (for example, the word colour can also be spelt color, but they have the same definition).\n\nExcellent, we can all grasp that. But it very quickly starts to fall apart. Even in the HTML specification the definition list is mis-used.\n\n\n\tAnother application of DL, for example, is for marking up dialogues, with each DT naming a speaker, and each DD containing his or her words.\n\n\nWrong. Completely and utterly wrong. This is the biggest flaw in the HTML spec, along with dropping support for the start attribute on ordered lists. \u201cWhy?\u201d, you may ask. Let me give you an example from Romeo and Juliet, act 2, scene 2.\n\nJuliet\n\tRomeo!\nRomeo\n\tMy niesse?\nJuliet\n\tAt what o'clock tomorrow shall I send to thee?\nRomeo\n\tAt the hour of nine.\n\nNow, the problem here is that a given definition can have multiple descriptions (the DD). Really the dialog \u201cdescriptions\u201d should be rolled up under the terms, like so:\n\nJuliet\n\tRomeo!\n\tAt what o'clock tomorrow shall I send to thee?\nRomeo\n\tMy niesse?\n\tAt the hour of nine.\n\nSuddenly the play won\u2019t make anywhere near as much sense. (If it\u2019s anything, the correct markup for a play is an ordered list of CITE and BLOCKQUOTE elements.)\n\nThis is the first part of the problem. That simple example has turned definition lists in everyone\u2019s mind from pure definitions to more along the lines of a list with pre-configured heading(s) and text(s).\n\nScreen reader, enter stage left.\n\nIn many screen readers, a simple definition list would be read out as \u201cdefinition term equals definition description\u201d. So in our play excerpt, Juliet equals Romeo! That\u2019s not right, either. But this also leads a lot of people astray with definition lists to believing that they are useful for key/value pairs.\n\nBehaviour and convention\n\nThe WHAT-WG have noticed the common mis-use of the DL, and have codified it into the new spec. In the HTML5 draft, a definition list is no longer a definition list.\n\n\n\tThe dl element introduces an unordered association list consisting of zero or more name-value groups (a description list). Each group must consist of one or more names (dt elements) followed by one or more values (dd elements).\n\n\nThey also note that the \u201cdl element is inappropriate for marking up dialogue, since dialogue is ordered\u201d. So for that example they have created a DIALOG (sic) element.\n\nStrange, then, that they keep DL as-is but instead refer to it an \u201cassociation list\u201d. They have not created a new AL element, and kept DL for the original purpose. They have chosen not to correct the usage or to create a new opportunity for increased specificity in our HTML, but to \u201cpave the cowpath\u201d of convention.\n\nHow to use a definition list\n\nGiven that everyone else is using a DL incorrectly, should we? Well, if they all jumped off a bridge, would you too? No, of course you wouldn\u2019t. We don\u2019t have HTML5 yet, so we\u2019re stuck with the existing semantics of HTML4 and XHTML1. Which means that:\n\n\n\tListing dialogue is not defining anything.\n\tListing the attributes of a piece of hardware (resolution = 1600\u00d71200) is illustrating sample values, not defining anything (however, stating what \u2018resolution\u2019 actually means in this context would be a definition).\n\tListing the cast and crew of a given movie is not defining the people involved in making movies. (Stuart Gordon may have been the director of Space Truckers, but that by no means makes him the true definition of a director.)\n\tA menu of navigation items is simply a nested ordered or unordered list of links, not a definition list.\n\tApplying styling handles to form labels and elements is not a good use for a definition list.\n\n\nAnd so on.\n\nLiving by the specification, a definition list should be used for term definitions \u2013 glossaries, lexicons and dictionaries \u2013 only.\n\nAnything else is a crime against markup.", "year": "2007", "author": "Mark Norman Francis", "author_slug": "marknormanfrancis", "published": "2007-12-05T00:00:00+00:00", "url": "https://24ways.org/2007/my-other-christmas-present-is-a-definition-list/", "topic": "code"}