{"rowid": 77, "title": "Colour Accessibility", "contents": "Here\u2019s a quote from Josef Albers:\n\nIn visual perception a colour is almost never seen as it really is[\u2026] This fact makes colour the most relative medium in art.Josef Albers, Interaction of Color, 1963\n\nAlbers was a German abstract painter and teacher, and published a very famous course on colour theory in 1963. Colour is very relative \u2014 not just in the way that it appears differently across different devices due to screen quality and colour management, but it can also be seen differently by different people \u2014 something we really need to be more mindful of when designing.\n\nWhat is colour blindness?\n\nColour blindness very rarely means that you can\u2019t see any colour at all, or that people see things in greyscale. It\u2019s actually a decreased ability to see colour, or a decreased ability to tell colours apart from one another. \n\nHow does it happen?\n\nInside the typical human retina, there are two types of receptor cells \u2014 rods and cones. Rods are the cells that allow us to see dark and light, and shape and movement. Cones are the cells that allow us to perceive colour. There are three types of cones, each responsible for absorbing blue, red, and green wavelengths in the spectrum.\n\nProblems with colour vision occur when one or more of these types of cones are defective or absent entirely, and these problems can either be inherited through genetics, or acquired through trauma, exposure to ultraviolet light, degeneration with age, an effect of diabetes, or other factors.\n\nColour blindness is a sex-linked trait and it\u2019s much more common in men than in women. The most common type of colour blindness is called deuteranomaly which occurs in 7% of males, but only 0.5% of females. That\u2019s a pretty significant portion of the population if you really stop and think about it \u2014\u00a0we can\u2019t ignore this demographic.\n\nWhat does it look like?\n\nPeople with the most common types of colour blindness, like protanopia and deuteranopia, have difficulty discriminating between red and green hues. There are also forms of colour blindness like tritanopia, which affects perception of blue and yellow hues. Below, you can see what a colour wheel might look like to these different people.\n\n\n\nWhat can we do?\n\nHere are some things you can do to make your websites and apps more accessible to people with all types of colour blindness.\n\nInclude colour names and show examples\n\nOne of the most common annoyances I\u2019ve heard from people who are colour-blind is that they often have difficulty purchasing clothing and they will sometimes need to ask another person for a second opinion on what the colour of the clothing might actually be. While it\u2019s easier to shop online than in a physical store, there are still accessibility issues to consider on shopping websites.\n\nLet\u2019s say you\u2019ve got a website that sells T-shirts. If you only show a photo of the shirt, it may be impossible for a person to tell what colour the shirt really is. For clarification, be sure to reference the name of the colour in the description of the product.\n\n\n\nUnited Pixelworkers does a great job of following this rule. The St. John\u2019s T-shirt has a quirky palette inspired by the unofficial pink, white and green Newfoundland flag, and I can imagine many people not liking it.\n\nAnother common problem occurs when a colour filter has been added to a product search. Here\u2019s an example from a clothing website with unlabelled colour swatches, and how that might look to someone with deuteranopia-type colour blindness.\n\n\n\nThe colour search filter below, from the H&M website, is much better since it uses names instead.\n\n\n\nAt first glance, Urban Outfitters also uses unlabelled colour swatches on product pages (below), but on closer inspection, the colour name is displayed on hover. This isn\u2019t an ideal solution, because although it\u2019ll work on a desktop browser, it won\u2019t work on a touchscreen device where hovering isn\u2019t an option. \n\n\n\nUsing overly fancy colour names, like the ones you might find labelling high-end interior paint can be just as confusing as not using a colour name at all. Names like grape instead of purple don\u2019t really give the viewer any useful information about what the colour actually is on a colour wheel. Is grape supposed to be purple, or could it refer to red grapes or even green? Stick with hue names as much as possible.\n\nAvoid colour-specific instructions\n\nWhen designing forms, avoid labelling required fields only with coloured text. It\u2019s safer to use a symbol cue like the asterisk which is colour-independent. \n\n\n\nA similar example would be directing a user to click a green button to purchase a product. Label your buttons clearly and reference them in the site copy by function, not colour, to avoid confusion.\n\nDon\u2019t rely on colour coding\n\nDesigning accessible maps and infographics can be much more challenging. \n\nDon\u2019t rely on colour coding alone \u2014 try to use a combination of colour and texture or pattern, along with precise labels, and reflect this in the key or legend. Combine a blue background with a crosshatched pattern, or a pink background with a stippled dot \u2014 your users will always have two pieces of information to work with.\n\n\n\nThe map of the London subway system is an iconic image not just in London, but around the world. Unfortunately, it contains some colours that are indistinguishable from each other to a person with a vision problem. This is true not only for the London underground, but also for any other wayfinding system that relies on colour coding as the only key in a legend. \n\n\n\nThere are printable versions of the map available online in black and white, using patterns and shades of black and grey that are distinguishable, but the point is that there would be no need for such a map if it were designed with accessibility in mind from the beginning. And, if you\u2019re a person who has a physical disability as well as a vision problem, the \u201cStep-Free\u201d guide map which shows stations is based on the original coloured map. \n\n\n\nProvide alternatives and customization\n\nWhile it\u2019s best to consider these issues and design your app to be accessible by default, sometimes this might not be possible. Providing alternative styles or allowing users to edit their own colours is a feature to keep in mind.\n\nThe developers of the game Faster Than Light created an alternate colour-blind mode and asked for public feedback to make sure that it passed the test. Not much needed to be done, but you can see they added stripes to the red zones and changed some outlines to blue.\n\n\n\niChat is also a good example. Although by default it uses coloured bubbles to indicate a user\u2019s status (available for chat, away or idle, or busy), included in the preferences is a \u201cUser Shapes to Indicate Status\u201d option, which changes the shape of the standard circles to green circles, yellow triangles and red squares.\n\n\n\nPay attention to contrast  \n\nColours that are similar in value but different in hue may be easy to distinguish between for a user with good vision, but a person who suffers from colour blindness may not be able to tell them apart at all. Proofing your work in greyscale is a quick way to tell if there\u2019s enough contrast between the most important information in your design.\n\nCheck with a simulator\n\nThere are many tools out there for simulating different types of colour blindness, and it\u2019s worth checking your design to catch any potential problems up front. \n\nOne is called Sim Daltonism and it\u2019s available for Mac OS X. It\u2019ll show a pop-up preview next to your cursor and you can choose which type of colour blindness you want to test from a drop-down menu. \n\n\n\nYou can also proof for the two most common types of colour blindness right in Photoshop or Illustrator (CS4 and later) while you\u2019re designing. \n\n\n\nThe colour contrast check tool from designer and developer Jonathan Snook gives you the option to enter a colour code for a background, and a colour code for text, and it\u2019ll tell you if the colour contrast ratio meets the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0. You can use the built-in sliders to adjust your colours until they meet the compliant contrast ratios. This is a great tool to test your palette before going live.\n\n\n\nFor live websites, you can use the accessibility tool called WAVE, which also has a contrast checker. It\u2019s important to keep in mind, though, that while WAVE can identify contrast errors in text, other things can slip through, so a site that passes the test does not automatically mean it\u2019s accessible in reality.\n\nFor example, the contrast checker here doesn\u2019t notice that our red link in the introduction isn\u2019t underlined, and therefore could blend into the surrounding paragraph text. \n\n\n\nI know that once I started getting into the habit of checking my work in a simulator, I became more mindful of any potential problem areas and it was easier to avoid them up front. It\u2019s also made me question everything I see around me and it sends red flags off in my head if I think it\u2019s a serious colour blindness fail. Understanding that colour is relative in the planning stages and following these tips will help us make more accessible design for all.", "year": "2012", "author": "Geri Coady", "author_slug": "gericoady", "published": "2012-12-04T00:00:00+00:00", "url": "https://24ways.org/2012/colour-accessibility/", "topic": "design"}