{"rowid": 54, "title": "Putting My Patterns through Their Paces", "contents": "Over the last few years, the conversation around responsive design has shifted subtly, focusing not on designing pages, but on patterns: understanding the small, reusable elements that comprise a larger design system. And given that many of those patterns are themselves responsive, learning to manage these small layout systems has become a big part of my work.\nThe thing is, the more pattern-driven work I do, the more I realize my design process has changed in a number of subtle, important ways. I suppose you might even say that pattern-driven design has, in a few ways, redesigned me.\nMeet the Teaser\nHere\u2019s a recent example. A few months ago, some friends and I redesigned The Toast. (It was a really, really fun project, and we learned a lot.) Each page of the site is, as you might guess, stitched together from a host of tiny, reusable patterns. Some of them, like the search form and footer, are fairly unique, and used once per page; others are used more liberally, and built for reuse. The most prevalent example of these more generic patterns is the teaser, which is classed as, uh, .teaser. (Look, I never said I was especially clever.)\nIn its simplest form, a teaser contains a headline, which links to an article:\n\nFairly straightforward, sure. But it\u2019s just the foundation: from there, teasers can have a byline, a description, a thumbnail, and a comment count. In other words, we have a basic building block (.teaser) that contains a few discrete content types \u2013 some required, some not. In fact, very few of those pieces need to be present; to qualify as a teaser, all we really need is a link and a headline. But by adding more elements, we can build slight variations of our teaser, and make it much, much more versatile.\n\n Nearly every element visible on this page is built out of our generic \u201cteaser\u201d pattern.\n \nBut the teaser variation I\u2019d like to call out is the one that appears on The Toast\u2019s homepage, on search results or on section fronts. In the main content area, each teaser in the list features larger images, as well as an interesting visual treatment: the byline and comment count were the most prominent elements within each teaser, appearing above the headline.\n\n The approved visual design of our teaser, as it appears on lists on the homepage and the section fronts.\n \nAnd this is, as it happens, the teaser variation that gave me pause. Back in the old days \u2013 you know, like six months ago \u2013 I probably would\u2019ve marked this module up to match the design. In other words, I would\u2019ve looked at the module\u2019s visual hierarchy (metadata up top, headline and content below) and written the following HTML:\n
\n

By Author Name

\n 126 comments\n

Article Title

\n

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur\u2026

\n
\nBut then I caught myself, and realized this wasn\u2019t the best approach.\nMoving Beyond Layout\nSince I\u2019ve started working responsively, there\u2019s a question I work into every step of my design process. Whether I\u2019m working in Sketch, CSSing a thing, or researching a project, I try to constantly ask myself:\n\nWhat if someone doesn\u2019t browse the web like I do?\n\n\u2026Okay, that doesn\u2019t seem especially fancy. (And maybe you came here for fancy.) But as straightforward as that question might seem, it\u2019s been invaluable to so many aspects of my practice. If I\u2019m working on a widescreen layout, that question helps me remember the constraints of the small screen; if I\u2019m working on an interface that has some enhancements for touch, it helps me consider other input modes as I work. It\u2019s also helpful as a reminder that many might not see the screen the same way I do, and that accessibility (in all its forms) should be a throughline for our work on the web.\nAnd that last point, thankfully, was what caught me here. While having the byline and comment count at the top was a lovely visual treatment, it made for a terrible content hierarchy. For example, it\u2019d be a little weird if the page was being read aloud in a speaking browser: the name of the author and the number of comments would be read aloud before the title of the article with which they\u2019re associated.\nThat\u2019s why I find it\u2019s helpful to begin designing a pattern\u2019s hierarchy before its layout: to move past the visual presentation in front of me, and focus on the underlying content I\u2019m trying to support. In other words, if someone\u2019s encountering my design without the CSS I\u2019ve written, what should their experience be?\nSo I took a step back, and came up with a different approach:\n
\n

Article Title

\n

By Author Name

\n

\n Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur\u2026\n 126 comments\n

\n
\nMuch, much better. This felt like a better match for the content I was designing: the headline \u2013 easily most important element \u2013 was at the top, followed by the author\u2019s name and an excerpt. And while the comment count is visually the most prominent element in the teaser, I decided it was hierarchically the least critical: that\u2019s why it\u2019s at the very end of the excerpt, the last element within our teaser. And with some light styling, we\u2019ve got a respectable-looking hierarchy in place:\n\nYeah, you\u2019re right \u2013 it\u2019s not our final design. But from this basic-looking foundation, we can layer on a bit more complexity. First, we\u2019ll bolster the markup with an extra element around our title and byline:\n
\n
\n

Article Title

\n \n
\n \u2026\n
\nWith that in place, we can use flexbox to tweak our layout, like so:\n.teaser-hed {\n display: flex;\n flex-direction: column-reverse;\n}\nflex-direction: column-reverse acts a bit like a change in gravity within our teaser-hed element, vertically swapping its two children.\n\nGetting closer! But as great as flexbox is, it doesn\u2019t do anything for elements outside our container, like our little comment count, which is, as you\u2019ve probably noticed, still stranded at the very bottom of our teaser.\nFlexbox is, as you might already know, wonderful! And while it enjoys incredibly broad support, there are enough implementations of old versions of Flexbox (in addition to plenty of bugs) that I tend to use a feature test to check if the browser\u2019s using a sufficiently modern version of flexbox. Here\u2019s the one we used:\nvar doc = document.body || document.documentElement;\nvar style = doc.style;\n\nif ( style.webkitFlexWrap == '' ||\n style.msFlexWrap == '' ||\n style.flexWrap == '' ) {\n doc.className += \" supports-flex\";\n}\nEagle-eyed readers will note we could have used @supports feature queries to ask browsers if they support certain CSS properties, removing the JavaScript dependency. But since we wanted to serve the layout to IE we opted to write a little question in JavaScript, asking the browser if it supports flex-wrap, a property used elsewhere in the design. If the browser passes the test, then a class of supports-flex gets applied to our html element. And with that class in place, we can safely quarantine our flexbox-enabled layout from less-capable browsers, and finish our teaser\u2019s design:\n.supports-flex .teaser-hed {\n display: flex;\n flex-direction: column-reverse;\n}\n.supports-flex .teaser .comment-count {\n position: absolute;\n right: 0;\n top: 1.1em;\n}\nIf the supports-flex class is present, we can apply our flexbox layout to the title area, sure \u2013 but we can also safely use absolute positioning to pull our comment count out of its default position, and anchor it to the top right of our teaser. In other words, the browsers that don\u2019t meet our threshold for our advanced styles are left with an attractive design that matches our HTML\u2019s content hierarchy; but the ones that pass our test receive the finished, final design.\n\nAnd with that, our teaser\u2019s complete.\nDiving Into Device-Agnostic Design\nThis is, admittedly, a pretty modest application of flexbox. (For some truly next-level work, I\u2019d recommend Heydon Pickering\u2019s \u201cFlexbox Grid Finesse\u201d, or anything Zoe Mickley Gillenwater publishes.) And for such a simple module, you might feel like this is, well, quite a bit of work. And you\u2019d be right! In fact, it\u2019s not one layout, but two: a lightly styled content hierarchy served to everyone, with the finished design served conditionally to the browsers that can successfully implement it. But I\u2019ve found that thinking about my design as existing in broad experience tiers \u2013 in layers \u2013 is one of the best ways of designing for the modern web. And what\u2019s more, it works not just for simple modules like our teaser, but for more complex or interactive patterns as well.\nOpen video\n \n Even a simple search form can be conditionally enhanced, given a little layered thinking.\n \nThis more layered approach to interface design isn\u2019t a new one, mind you: it\u2019s been championed by everyone from Filament Group to the BBC. And with all the challenges we keep uncovering, a more device-agnostic approach is one of the best ways I\u2019ve found to practice responsive design. As Trent Walton once wrote,\n\nLike cars designed to perform in extreme heat or on icy roads, websites should be built to face the reality of the web\u2019s inherent variability.\n\nWe have a weird job, working on the web. We\u2019re designing for the latest mobile devices, sure, but we\u2019re increasingly aware that our definition of \u201csmartphone\u201d is much too narrow. Browsers have started appearing on our wrists and in our cars\u2019 dashboards, but much of the world\u2019s mobile data flows over sub-3G networks. After all, the web\u2019s evolution has never been charted along a straight line: it\u2019s simultaneously getting slower and faster, with devices new and old coming online every day. With all the challenges in front of us, including many we don\u2019t yet know about, a more device-agnostic, more layered design process can better prepare our patterns \u2013 and ourselves \u2013 for the future.\n(It won\u2019t help you get enough to eat at holiday parties, though.)", "year": "2015", "author": "Ethan Marcotte", "author_slug": "ethanmarcotte", "published": "2015-12-10T00:00:00+00:00", "url": "https://24ways.org/2015/putting-my-patterns-through-their-paces/", "topic": "code"}