| 121 |
Hide And Seek in The Head |
If you want your JavaScript-enhanced pages to remain accessible and understandable to scripted and noscript users alike, you have to think before you code. Which functionalities are required (ie. should work without JavaScript)? Which ones are merely nice-to-have (ie. can be scripted)? You should only start creating the site when you’ve taken these decisions.
Special HTML elements
Once you have a clear idea of what will work with and without JavaScript, you’ll likely find that you need a few HTML elements for the noscript version only.
Take this example: A form has a nifty bit of Ajax that automatically and silently sends a request once the user enters something in a form field. However, in order to preserve accessibility, the user should also be able to submit the form normally. So the form should have a submit button in noscript browsers, but not when the browser supports sufficient JavaScript.
Since the button is meant for noscript browsers, it must be hard-coded in the HTML:
<input type="submit" value="Submit form" id="noScriptButton" />
When JavaScript is supported, it should be removed:
var checkJS = [check JavaScript support];
window.onload = function () {
if (!checkJS) return;
document.getElementById('noScriptButton').style.display = 'none';
}
Problem: the load event
Although this will likely work fine in your testing environment, it’s not completely correct. What if a user with a modern, JavaScript-capable browser visits your page, but has to wait for a huge graphic to load? The load event fires only after all assets, including images, have been loaded. So this user will first see a submit button, but then all of a sudden it’s removed. That’s potentially confusing.
Fortunately there’s a simple solution: play a bit of hide and seek in the <head>:
var checkJS = [check JavaScript support];
if (checkJS) {
document.write('<style>#noScriptButton{display: none}</style>');
}
First, check if the browser supports enough JavaScript. If it does, document.write an extra <style> element that hides the button.
The difference with the previous technique is that the document.write command is outside any function, and is therefore executed while the JavaScript is being parsed. Thus, the #noScriptButton{display: none} rule is written into the document before the actual HTML is received.
That’s exactly what we want. If the rule is already present at the moment the HTML for the submit button is received and parsed, the button is hidden immediately. Even if the user (and the load event) have to wait for a huge image, the button is already hidden, and both scripted and noscript users see the interface they need, without any potentially confusing flashes of useless content.
In general, if you want to hide content that’s not relevant to scripted users, give the hide command in CSS, and make sure it’s given before the HTML element is loaded and parsed.
Alternative
Some people won’t like to use document.write. They could also add an empty <link /> element to the <head> and give it an href attribute once the browser’s JavaScript capabilities have been evaluated. The <link /> element is made to refer to a style sheet that contains the crucial #noScriptButton{display: none}, and everything works fine.
Important note: The script needs access to the <link />, and the only way to ensure that access is to include the empty <link /> element before your <script> tag. |
2006 |
Peter-Paul Koch |
ppk |
2006-12-06T00:00:00+00:00 |
https://24ways.org/2006/hide-and-seek-in-the-head/ |
code |
| 124 |
Writing Responsible JavaScript |
Without a doubt, JavaScript has been making something of a comeback in the last year. If you’re involved in client-side development in any way at all, chances are that you’re finding yourself writing more JavaScript now than you have in a long time.
If you learned most of your JavaScript back when DHTML was all the rage and before DOM Scripting was in vogue, there have been some big shifts in the way scripts are written. Most of these are in the way event handlers are assigned and functions declared. Both of these changes are driven by the desire to write scripts that are responsible page citizens, both in not tying behaviour to content and in taking care not to conflict with other scripts. I thought it may be useful to look at some of these more responsible approaches to learn how to best write scripts that are independent of the page content and are safely portable between different applications.
Event Handling
Back in the heady days of Web 1.0, if you wanted to have an object on the page react to something like a click, you would simply go ahead and attach an onclick attribute. This was easy and understandable, but much like the font tag or the style attribute, it has the downside of mixing behaviour or presentation in with our content. As we’re learned with CSS, there are big benefits in keeping those layers separate. Hey, if it works for CSS, it should work for JavaScript too.
Just like with CSS, instead of adding an attribute to our element within the document, the more responsible way to do that is to look for the item from your script (like CSS does with a selector) and then assign the behaviour to it. To give an example, take this oldskool onclick use case:
<a id="anim-link" href="#" onclick="playAnimation()">Play the animation</a>
This could be rewritten by removing the onclick attribute, and instead doing the following from within your JavaScript.
document.getElementById('anim-link').onclick = playAnimation;
It’s all in the timing
Of course, it’s never quite that easy. To be able to attach that onclick, the element you’re targeting has to exist in the page, and the page has to have finished loading for the DOM to be available. This is where the onload event is handy, as it fires once everything has finished loading. Common practise is to have a function called something like init() (short for initialise) that sets up all these event handlers as soon as the page is ready.
Back in the day we would have used the onload attibute on the <body> element to do this, but of course what we really want is:
window.onload = init;
As an interesting side note, we’re using init here rather than init() so that the function is assigned to the event. If we used the parentheses, the init function would have been run at that moment, and the result of running the function (rather than the function itself) would be assigned to the event. Subtle, but important.
As is becoming apparent, nothing is ever simple, and we can’t just go around assigning our initialisation function to window.onload. What if we’re using other scripts in the page that might also want to listen out for that event? Whichever script got there last would overwrite everything that came before it. To manage this, we need a script that checks for any existing event handlers, and adds the new handler to it. Most of the JavaScript libraries have their own systems for doing this. If you’re not using a library, Simon Willison has a good stand-alone example
function addLoadEvent(func) {
var oldonload = window.onload;
if (typeof window.onload != 'function') {
window.onload = func;
} else {
window.onload = function() {
if (oldonload) {
oldonload();
}
func();
}
}
}
Obviously this is just a toe in the events model’s complex waters. Some good further reading is PPK’s Introduction to Events.
Carving out your own space
Another problem that rears its ugly head when combining multiple scripts on a single page is that of making sure that the scripts don’t conflict. One big part of that is ensuring that no two scripts are trying to create functions or variables with the same names. Reusing a name in JavaScript just over-writes whatever was there before it.
When you create a function in JavaScript, you’ll be familiar with doing something like this.
function foo() {
... goodness ...
}
This is actually just creating a variable called foo and assigning a function to it. It’s essentially the same as the following.
var foo = function() {
... goodness ...
}
This name foo is by default created in what’s known as the ‘global namespace’ – the general pool of variables within the page. You can quickly see that if two scripts use foo as a name, they will conflict because they’re both creating those variables in the global namespace.
A good solution to this problem is to add just one name into the global namespace, make that one item either a function or an object, and then add everything else you need inside that. This takes advantage of JavaScript’s variable scoping to contain you mess and stop it interfering with anyone else.
Creating An Object
Say I was wanting to write a bunch of functions specifically for using on a site called ‘Foo Online’. I’d want to create my own object with a name I think is likely to be unique to me.
var FOOONLINE = {};
We can then start assigning functions are variables to it like so:
FOOONLINE.message = 'Merry Christmas!';
FOOONLINE.showMessage = function() {
alert(this.message);
};
Calling FOOONLINE.showMessage() in this example would alert out our seasonal greeting. The exact same thing could also be expressed in the following way, using the object literal syntax.
var FOOONLINE = {
message: 'Merry Christmas!',
showMessage: function() {
alert(this.message);
}
};
Creating A Function to Create An Object
We can extend this idea bit further by using a function that we run in place to return an object. The end result is the same, but this time we can use closures to give us something like private methods and properties of our object.
var FOOONLINE = function(){
var message = 'Merry Christmas!';
return {
showMessage: function(){
alert(message);
}
}
}();
There are two important things to note here. The first is the parentheses at the end of line 10. Just as we saw earlier, this runs the function in place and causes its result to be assigned. In this case the result of our function is the object that is returned at line 4.
The second important thing to note is the use of the var keyword on line 2. This ensures that the message variable is created inside the scope of the function and not in the global namespace. Because of the way closure works (which if you’re not familiar with, just suspend your disbelief for a moment) that message variable is visible to everything inside the function but not outside. Trying to read FOOONLINE.message from the page would return undefined.
This is useful for simulating the concept of private class methods and properties that exist in other programming languages. I like to take the approach of making everything private unless I know it’s going to be needed from outside, as it makes the interface into your code a lot clearer for someone else to read.
All Change, Please
So that was just a whistle-stop tour of a couple of the bigger changes that can help to make your scripts better page citizens. I hope it makes useful Sunday reading, but obviously this is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to designing modular, reusable code.
For some, this is all familiar ground already. If that’s the case, I encourage you to perhaps submit a comment with any useful resources you’ve found that might help others get up to speed. Ultimately it’s in all of our interests to make sure that all our JavaScript interoperates well – share your tips. |
2006 |
Drew McLellan |
drewmclellan |
2006-12-10T00:00:00+00:00 |
https://24ways.org/2006/writing-responsible-javascript/ |
code |
| 126 |
Intricate Fluid Layouts in Three Easy Steps |
The Year of the Script may have drawn attention away from CSS but building fluid, multi-column, cross-browser CSS layouts can still be as unpleasant as a lump of coal. Read on for a worry-free approach in three quick steps.
The layout system I developed, YUI Grids CSS, has three components. They can be used together as we’ll see, or independently.
The Three Easy Steps
Choose fluid or fixed layout, and choose the width (in percents or pixels) of the page.
Choose the size, orientation, and source-order of the main and secondary blocks of content.
Choose the number of columns and how they distribute (for example 50%-50% or 25%-75%), using stackable and nestable grid structures.
The Setup
There are two prerequisites: We need to normalize the size of an em and opt into the browser rendering engine’s Strict Mode.
Ems are a superior unit of measure for our case because they represent the current font size and grow as the user increases their font size setting. This flexibility—the container growing with the user’s wishes—means larger text doesn’t get crammed into an unresponsive container. We’ll use YUI Fonts CSS to set the base size because it provides consistent-yet-adaptive font-sizes while preserving user control.
The second prerequisite is to opt into Strict Mode (more info on rendering modes) by declaring a Doctype complete with URI. You can choose XHTML or HTML, and Transitional or Strict. I prefer HTML 4.01 Strict, which looks like this:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
Including the CSS
A single small CSS file powers a nearly-infinite number of layouts thanks to a recursive system and the interplay between the three distinct components. You could prune to a particular layout’s specific needs, but why bother when the complete file weighs scarcely 1.8kb uncompressed? Compressed, YUI Fonts and YUI Grids combine for a miniscule 0.9kb over the wire.
You could save an HTTP request by concatenating the two CSS files, or by adding their contents to your own CSS, but I’ll keep them separate for now:
<link href="fonts.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
<link href="grids.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
Example: The Setup
Now we’re ready to build some layouts.
Step 1: Choose Fluid or Fixed Layout
Choose between preset widths of 750px, 950px, and 100% by giving a document-wrapping div an ID of doc, doc2, or doc3. These options cover most use cases, but it’s easy to define a custom fixed width.
The fluid 100% grid (doc3) is what I’ve been using almost exclusively since it was introduced in the last YUI released.
<body>
<div id="doc3"></div>
</body>
All pages are centered within the viewport, and grow with font size. The 100% width page (doc3) preserves 10px of breathing room via left and right margins. If you prefer your content flush to the viewport, just add doc3 {margin:auto} to your CSS.
Regardless of what you choose in the other two steps, you can always toggle between these widths and behaviors by simply swapping the ID value. It’s really that simple.
Example: 100% fluid layout
Step 2: Choose a Template Preset
This is perhaps the most frequently omitted step (they’re all optional), but I use it nearly every time. In a source-order-independent way (good for accessibility and SEO), “Template Presets” provide commonly used template widths compatible with ad-unit dimension standards defined by the Interactive Advertising Bureau, an industry association.
Choose between the six Template Presets (.yui-t1 through .yui-t6) by setting the class value on the document-wrapping div established in Step 1. Most frequently I use yui-t3, which puts the narrow secondary block on the left and makes it 300px wide.
<body>
<div id="doc3" class="yui-t3"></div>
</body>
The Template Presets control two “blocks” of content, which are defined by two divs, each with yui-b (“b” for “block”) class values. Template Presets describe the width and orientation of the secondary block; the main block will take up the rest of the space.
<body>
<div id="doc3" class="yui-t3">
<div class="yui-b"></div>
<div class="yui-b"></div>
</div>
</body>
Use a wrapping div with an ID of yui-main to structurally indicate which block is the main block. This wrapper—not the source order—identifies the main block.
<body>
<div id="doc3" class="yui-t3">
<div id="yui-main">
<div class="yui-b"></div>
</div>
<div class="yui-b"></div>
</div>
</body>
Example: Main and secondary blocks sized and oriented with .yui-t3 Template Preset
Again, regardless of what values you choose in the other steps, you can always toggle between these Template Presets by toggling the class value of your document-wrapping div. It’s really that simple.
Step 3: Nest and Stack Grid Structures.
The bulk of the power of the system is in this third step. The key is that columns are built by parents telling children how to behave. By default, two children each consume half of their parent’s area. Put two units inside a grid structure, and they will sit side-by-side, and they will each take up half the space. Nest this structure and two columns become four. Stack them for rows of columns.
An Even Number of Columns
The default behavior creates two evenly-distributed columns. It’s easy. Define one parent grid with .yui-g (“g” for grid) and two child units with .yui-u (“u” for unit). The code looks like this:
<div class="yui-g">
<div class="yui-u first"></div>
<div class="yui-u"></div>
</div>
Be sure to indicate the “first“ unit because the :first-child pseudo-class selector isn’t supported across all A-grade browsers. It’s unfortunate we need to add this, but luckily it’s not out of place in the markup layer since it is structural information.
Example: Two evenly-distributed columns in the main content block
An Odd Number of Columns
The default system does not work for an odd number of columns without using the included “Special Grids” classes. To create three evenly distributed columns, use the “yui-gb“ Special Grid:
<div class="yui-gb">
<div class="yui-u first"></div>
<div class="yui-u"></div>
<div class="yui-u"></div>
</div>
Example: Three evenly distributed columns in the main content block
Uneven Column Distribution
Special Grids are also used for unevenly distributed column widths. For example, .yui-ge tells the first unit (column) to take up 75% of the parent’s space and the other unit to take just 25%.
<div class="yui-ge">
<div class="yui-u first"></div>
<div class="yui-u"></div>
</div>
Example: Two columns in the main content block split 75%-25%
Putting It All Together
Start with a full-width fluid page (div#doc3). Make the secondary block 180px wide on the right (div.yui-t4). Create three rows of columns: Three evenly distributed columns in the first row (div.yui-gb), two uneven columns (66%-33%) in the second row (div.yui-gc), and two evenly distributed columns in the thrid row.
<body>
<!-- choose fluid page and Template Preset -->
<div id="doc3" class="yui-t4">
<!-- main content block -->
<div id="yui-main">
<div class="yui-b">
<!-- stacked grid structure, Special Grid "b" -->
<div class="yui-gb">
<div class="yui-u first"></div>
<div class="yui-u"></div>
<div class="yui-u"></div>
</div>
<!-- stacked grid structure, Special Grid "c" -->
<div class="yui-gc">
<div class="yui-u first"></div>
<div class="yui-u"></div>
</div>
<!-- stacked grid structure -->
<div class="yui-g">
<div class="yui-u first"></div>
<div class="yui-u"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<!-- secondary content block -->
<div class="yui-b"></div>
</div>
</body>
Example: A complex layout.
Wasn’t that easy? Now that you know the three “levers” of YUI Grids CSS, you’ll be creating headache-free fluid layouts faster than you can say “Peace on Earth”. |
2006 |
Nate Koechley |
natekoechley |
2006-12-20T00:00:00+00:00 |
https://24ways.org/2006/intricate-fluid-layouts/ |
code |
| 128 |
Boost Your Hyperlink Power |
There are HTML elements and attributes that we use every day. Headings, paragraphs, lists and images are the mainstay of every Web developer’s toolbox. Perhaps the most common tool of all is the anchor. The humble a element is what joins documents together to create the gloriously chaotic collection we call the World Wide Web.
Anatomy of an Anchor
The power of the anchor element lies in the href attribute, short for hypertext reference. This creates a one-way link to another resource, usually another page on the Web:
<a href="http://allinthehead.com/">
The href attribute sits in the opening a tag and some descriptive text sits between the opening and closing tags:
<a href="http://allinthehead.com/">Drew McLellan</a>
“Whoop-dee-freakin’-doo,” I hear you say, “this is pretty basic stuff” – and you’re quite right. But there’s more to the anchor element than just the href attribute.
The Theory of relativity
You might be familiar with the rel attribute from the link element. I bet you’ve got something like this in the head of your documents:
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" href="styles.css" />
The rel attribute describes the relationship between the linked document and the current document. In this case, the value of rel is “stylesheet”. This means that the linked document is the stylesheet for the current document: that’s its relationship.
Here’s another common use of rel:
<link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="my RSS feed" href="index.xml" />
This describes the relationship of the linked file – an RSS feed – as “alternate”: an alternate view of the current document.
Both of those examples use the link element but you are free to use the rel attribute in regular hyperlinks. Suppose you’re linking to your RSS feed in the body of your page:
Subscribe to <a href="index.xml">my RSS feed</a>.
You can add extra information to this anchor using the rel attribute:
Subscribe to <a href="index.xml" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml">my RSS feed</a>.
There’s no prescribed list of values for the rel attribute so you can use whatever you decide is semantically meaningful. Let’s say you’ve got a complex e-commerce application that includes a link to a help file. You can explicitly declare the relationship of the linked file as being “help”:
<a href="help.html" rel="help">need help?</a>
Elemental Microformats
Although it’s completely up to you what values you use for the rel attribute, some consensus is emerging in the form of microformats. Some of the simplest microformats make good use of rel. For example, if you are linking to a license that covers the current document, use the rel-license microformat:
Licensed under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" rel="license">Creative Commons attribution license</a>
That describes the relationship of the linked document as “license.”
The rel-tag microformat goes a little further. It uses rel to describe the final part of the URL of the linked file as a “tag” for the current document:
Learn more about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microformats" rel="tag">semantic markup</a>
This states that the current document is being tagged with the value “Microformats.”
XFN, which stands for XHTML Friends Network, is a way of describing relationships between people:
<a href="http://allinthehead.com/" rel="friend">Drew McLellan</a>
This microformat makes use of a very powerful property of the rel attribute. Like the class attribute, rel can take multiple values, separated by spaces:
<a href="http://allinthehead.com/" rel="friend met colleague">Drew McLellan</a>
Here I’m describing Drew as being a friend, someone I’ve met, and a colleague (because we’re both Web monkies).
You Say You Want a revolution
While rel describes the relationship of the linked resource to the current document, the rev attribute describes the reverse relationship: it describes the relationship of the current document to the linked resource. Here’s an example of a link that might appear on help.html:
<a href="shoppingcart.html" rev="help">continue shopping</a>
The rev attribute declares that the current document is “help” for the linked file.
The vote-links microformat makes use of the rev attribute to allow you to qualify your links. By using the value “vote-for” you can describe your document as being an endorsement of the linked resource:
I agree with <a href="http://richarddawkins.net/home" rev="vote-for">Richard Dawkins</a>.
There’s a corresponding vote-against value. This means that you can link to a document but explicitly state that you don’t agree with it.
I agree with <a href="http://richarddawkins.net/home" rev="vote-for">Richard Dawkins</a>
about those <a href="http://www.icr.org/" rev="vote-against">creationists</a>.
Of course there’s nothing to stop you using both rel and rev on the same hyperlink:
<a href="http://richarddawkins.net/home" rev="vote-for" rel="muse">Richard Dawkins</a>
The Wisdom of Crowds
The simplicity of rel and rev belies their power. They allow you to easily add extra semantic richness to your hyperlinks. This creates a bounty that can be harvested by search engines, aggregators and browsers. Make it your New Year’s resolution to make friends with these attributes and extend the power of hypertext. |
2006 |
Jeremy Keith |
jeremykeith |
2006-12-18T00:00:00+00:00 |
https://24ways.org/2006/boost-your-hyperlink-power/ |
code |
| 129 |
Knockout Type - Thin Is Always In |
OS X has gorgeous native anti-aliasing (although I will admit to missing 10px aliased Geneva — *sigh*). This is especially true for dark text on a light background. However, things can go awry when you start using light text on a dark background. Strokes thicken. Counters constrict. Letterforms fill out like seasonal snackers.
So how do we combat the fat? In Safari and other Webkit-based browsers we can use the CSS ‘text-shadow’ property. While trying to add a touch more contrast to the navigation on haveamint.com I noticed an interesting side-effect on the weight of the type.
The second line in the example image above has the following style applied to it:
This creates an invisible drop-shadow. (Why is it invisible? The shadow is positioned directly behind the type (the first two zeros) and has no spread (the third zero). So the color, black, is completely eclipsed by the type it is supposed to be shadowing.)
Why applying an invisible drop-shadow effectively lightens the weight of the type is unclear. What is clear is that our light-on-dark text is now of a comparable weight to its dark-on-light counterpart.
You can see this trick in effect all over ShaunInman.com and in the navigation on haveamint.com and Subtraction.com. The HTML and CSS source code used to create the example images used in this article can be found here. |
2006 |
Shaun Inman |
shauninman |
2006-12-17T00:00:00+00:00 |
https://24ways.org/2006/knockout-type/ |
code |
| 132 |
Tasty Text Trimmer |
In most cases, when designing a user interface it’s best to make a decision about how data is best displayed and stick with it. Failing to make a decision ultimately leads to too many user options, which in turn can be taxing on the poor old user.
Under some circumstances, however, it’s good to give the user freedom in customising their workspace. One good example of this is the ‘Article Length’ tool in Apple’s Safari RSS reader. Sliding a slider left of right dynamically changes the length of each article shown. It’s that kind of awesomey magic stuff that’s enough to keep you from sleeping. Let’s build one.
The Setup
Let’s take a page that has lots of long text items, a bit like a news page or like Safari’s RSS items view. If we were to attach a class name to each element we wanted to resize, that would give us something to hook onto from the JavaScript.
Example 1: The basic page.
As you can see, I’ve wrapped my items in a DIV and added a class name of chunk to them. It’s these chunks that we’ll be finding with the JavaScript. Speaking of which …
Our Core Functions
There are two main tasks that need performing in our script. The first is to find the chunks we’re going to be resizing and store their original contents away somewhere safe. We’ll need this so that if we trim the text down we’ll know what it was if the user decides they want it back again. We’ll call this loadChunks.
var loadChunks = function(){
var everything = document.getElementsByTagName('*');
var i, l;
chunks = [];
for (i=0, l=everything.length; i<l; i++){
if (everything[i].className.indexOf(chunkClass) > -1){
chunks.push({
ref: everything[i],
original: everything[i].innerHTML
});
}
}
};
The variable chunks is stored outside of this function so that we can access it from our next core function, which is doTrim.
var doTrim = function(interval) {
if (!chunks) loadChunks();
var i, l;
for (i=0, l=chunks.length; i<l; i++){
var a = chunks[i].original.split(' ');
a = a.slice(0, interval);
chunks[i].ref.innerHTML = a.join(' ');
}
};
The first thing that needs to be done is to call loadChunks if the chunks variable isn’t set. This should only happen the first time doTrim is called, as from that point the chunks will be loaded.
Then all we do is loop through the chunks and trim them. The trimming itself (lines 6-8) is very simple. We split the text into an array of words (line 6), then select only a portion from the beginning of the array up until the number we want (line 7). Finally the words are glued back together (line 8).
In essense, that’s it, but it leaves us needing to know how to get the number into this function in the first place, and how that number is generated by the user. Let’s look at the latter case first.
The YUI Slider Widget
There are lots of JavaScript libraries available at the moment. A fair few of those are really good. I use the Yahoo! User Interface Library professionally, but have only recently played with their pre-build slider widget. Turns out, it’s pretty good and perfect for this task.
Once you have the library files linked in (check the docs linked above) it’s fairly straightforward to create yourself a slider.
slider = YAHOO.widget.Slider.getHorizSlider("sliderbg", "sliderthumb", 0, 100, 5);
slider.setValue(50);
slider.subscribe("change", doTrim);
All that’s needed then is some CSS to make the slider look like a slider, and of course a few bits of HTML. We’ll see those later.
See It Working!
Rather than spell out all the nuts and bolts of implementing this fairly simple script, let’s just look at in it action and then pick on some interesting bits I’ve added.
Example 2: Try the Tasty Text Trimmer.
At the top of the JavaScript file I’ve added a small number of settings.
var chunkClass = 'chunk';
var minValue = 10;
var maxValue = 100;
var multiplier = 5;
Obvious candidates for configuration are the class name used to find the chunks, and also the some minimum and maximum values. The minValue is the fewest number of words we wish to display when the slider is all the way down. The maxValue is the length of the slider, in this case 100.
Moving the slider makes a call to our doTrim function with the current value of the slider. For a slider 100 pixels long, this is going to be in the range of 0-100. That might be okay for some things, but for longer items of text you’ll want to allow for displaying more than 100 words. I’ve accounted for this by adding in a multiplier – in my code I’m multiplying the value by 5, so a slider value of 50 shows 250 words. You’ll probably want to tailor the multiplier to the type of content you’re using.
Keeping it Accessible
This effect isn’t something we can really achieve without JavaScript, but even so we must make sure that this functionality has no adverse impact on the page when JavaScript isn’t available. This is achieved by adding the slider markup to the page from within the insertSliderHTML function.
var insertSliderHTML = function(){
var s = '<a id="slider-less" href="#less"><img src="icon_min.gif" width="10" height="10" alt="Less text" class="first" /></a>';
s +=' <div id="sliderbg"><div id="sliderthumb"><img src="sliderthumbimg.gif" /></div></div>';
s +=' <a id="slider-more" href="#more"><img src="icon_max.gif" width="10" height="10" alt="More text" /></a>';
document.getElementById('slider').innerHTML = s;
}
The other important factor to consider is that a slider can be tricky to use unless you have good eyesight and pretty well controlled motor skills. Therefore we should provide a method of changing the value by the keyboard.
I’ve done this by making the icons at either end of the slider links so they can be tabbed to. Clicking on either icon fires the appropriate JavaScript function to show more or less of the text.
In Conclusion
The upshot of all this is that without JavaScript the page just shows all the text as it normally would. With JavaScript we have a slider for trimming the text excepts that can be controlled with the mouse or with a keyboard.
If you’re like me and have just scrolled to the bottom to find the working demo, here it is again:
Try the Tasty Text Trimmer
Trimmer for Christmas? Don’t say I never give you anything! |
2006 |
Drew McLellan |
drewmclellan |
2006-12-01T00:00:00+00:00 |
https://24ways.org/2006/tasty-text-trimmer/ |
code |
| 135 |
A Scripting Carol |
We all know the stories of the Ghost of Scripting Past – a time when the web was young and littered with nefarious scripting, designed to bestow ultimate control upon the developer, to pollute markup with event handler after event handler, and to entrench advertising in the minds of all that gazed upon her.
And so it came to be that JavaScript became a dirty word, thrown out of solutions by many a Scrooge without regard to the enhancements that JavaScript could bring to any web page. JavaScript, as it was, was dead as a door-nail.
With the arrival of our core philosophy that all standardistas hold to be true: “separate your concerns – content, presentation and behaviour,” we are in a new era of responsible development the Web Standards Way™. Or are we? Have we learned from the Ghosts of Scripting Past? Or are we now faced with new problems that come with new ways of implementing our solutions?
The Ghost of Scripting Past
If the Ghost of Scripting Past were with us it would probably say:
You must remember your roots and where you came from, and realize the misguided nature of your early attempts for control. That person you see down there, is real and they are the reason you exist in the first place… without them, you are nothing.
In many ways we’ve moved beyond the era of control and we do take into account the user, or at least much more so than we used to. Sadly – there is one advantage that old school inline event handlers had where we assigned and reassigned CSS style property values on the fly – we knew that if JavaScript wasn’t supported, the styles wouldn’t be added because we ended up doing them at the same time.
If anything, we need to have learned from the past that just because it works for us doesn’t mean it is going to work for anyone else – we need to test more scenarios than ever to observe the multitude of browsing arrangements we’ll observe: CSS on with JavaScript off, CSS off/overridden with JavaScript on, both on, both off/not supported. It is a situation that is ripe for conflict.
This may shock some of you, but there was a time when testing was actually easier: back in the day when Netscape 4 was king. Yes, that’s right. I actually kind of enjoyed Netscape 4 (hear me out, please). With NS4’s CSS implementation known as JavaScript Style Sheets, you knew that if JavaScript was off the styles were off too.
The Ghost of Scripting Present
With current best practice – we keep our CSS and JavaScript separate from each other. So what happens when some of our fancy, unobtrusive DOM Scripting doesn’t play nicely with our wonderfully defined style rules?
Lets look at one example of a collapsing and expanding menu to illustrate where we are now:
Simple Collapsing/Expanding Menu Example
We’re using some simple JavaScript (I’m using jquery in this case) to toggle between a CSS state for expanded and not expanded:
JavaScript
$(document).ready(function(){
TWOFOURWAYS.enableTree();
});
var TWOFOURWAYS = new Object();
TWOFOURWAYS.enableTree = function ()
{
$("ul li a").toggle(function(){
$(this.parentNode).addClass("expanded");
}, function() {
$(this.parentNode).removeClass("expanded");
});
return false;
}
CSS
ul li ul {
display: none;
}
ul li.expanded ul {
display: block;
}
At this point we’ve separated our presentation from our content and behaviour, and all is well, right?
Not quite.
Here’s where I typically see failures in the assessment work that I do on web sites and applications (Yes, call me Scrooge – I don’t care!). We know our page needs to work with or without scripting, and we know it needs to work with or without CSS. All too often the testing scenarios don’t take into account combinations.
Testing it out
So what happens when we test this? Make sure you test with:
CSS off
JavaScript off
Use the simple example again.
With CSS off, we revert to a simple nested list of links and all functionality is maintained. With JavaScript off, however, we run into a problem – we have now removed the ability to expand the menu using the JavaScript triggered CSS change.
Hopefully you see the problem – we have a JavaScript and CSS dependency that is critical to the functionality of the page. Unobtrusive scripting and binary on/off tests aren’t enough. We need more.
This Ghost of Scripting Present sighting is seen all too often.
Lets examine the JavaScript off scenario a bit further – if we require JavaScript to expand/show the branch of the tree we should use JavaScript to hide them in the first place. That way we guarantee functionality in all scenarios, and have achieved our baseline level of interoperability.
To revise this then, we’ll start with the sub items expanded, use JavaScript to collapse them, and then use the same JavaScript to expand them.
HTML
<ul>
<li><a href="#">Main Item</a>
<ul class="collapseme">
<li><a href="#">Sub item 1</a></li>
<li><a href="#">Sub item 2</a></li>
<li><a href="#">Sub item 3</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
CSS
/* initial style is expanded */
ul li ul.collapseme {
display: block;
}
JavaScript
// remove the class collapseme after the page loads
$("ul ul.collapseme").removeClass("collapseme");
And there you have it – a revised example with better interoperability.
This isn’t rocket surgery by any means. It is a simple solution to a ghostly problem that is too easily overlooked (and often is).
The Ghost of Scripting Future
Well, I’m not so sure about this one, but I’m guessing that in a few years’ time, we’ll all have seen a few more apparitions and have a few more tales to tell. And hopefully we’ll be able to share them on 24 ways.
Thanks to Drew for the invitation to contribute and thanks to everyone else out there for making this a great (and haunting) year on the web! |
2006 |
Derek Featherstone |
derekfeatherstone |
2006-12-21T00:00:00+00:00 |
https://24ways.org/2006/a-scripting-carol/ |
code |
| 136 |
Making XML Beautiful Again: Introducing Client-Side XSL |
Remember that first time you saw XML and got it? When you really understood what was possible and the deep meaning each element could carry? Now when you see XML, it looks ugly, especially when you navigate to a page of XML in a browser. Well, with every modern browser now supporting XSL 1.0, I’m going to show you how you can turn something as simple as an ATOM feed into a customised page using a browser, Notepad and some XSL.
What on earth is this XSL?
XSL is a family of recommendations for defining XML document transformation and presentation. It consists of three parts:
XSLT 1.0 – Extensible Stylesheet Language Transformation, a language for transforming XML
XPath 1.0 – XML Path Language, an expression language used by XSLT to access or refer to parts of an XML document. (XPath is also used by the XML Linking specification)
XSL-FO 1.0 – Extensible Stylesheet Language Formatting Objects, an XML vocabulary for specifying formatting semantics
XSL transformations are usually a one-to-one transformation, but with newer versions (XSL 1.1 and XSL 2.0) its possible to create many-to-many transformations too. So now you have an overview of XSL, on with the show…
So what do I need?
So to get going you need a browser an supports client-side XSL transformations such as Firefox, Safari, Opera or Internet Explorer. Second, you need a source XML file – for this we’re going to use an ATOM feed from Flickr.com. And lastly, you need an editor of some kind. I find Notepad++ quick for short XSLs, while I tend to use XMLSpy or Oxygen for complex XSL work.
Because we’re doing a client-side transformation, we need to modify the XML file to tell it where to find our yet-to-be-written XSL file. Take a look at the source XML file, which originates from my Flickr photos tagged sky, in ATOM format.
The top of the ATOM file now has an additional <?xml-stylesheet /> instruction, as can been seen on Line 2 below. This instructs the browser to use the XSL file to transform the document.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="flickr_transform.xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
Your first transformation
Your first XSL will look something like this:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0"
xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<xsl:output method="html" encoding="utf-8"/>
</xsl:stylesheet>
This is pretty much the starting point for most XSL files. You will notice the standard XML processing instruction at the top of the file (line 1). We then switch into XSL mode using the XSL namespace on all XSL elements (line 2). In this case, we have added namespaces for ATOM (line 4) and Dublin Core (line 5). This means the XSL can now read and understand those elements from the source XML.
After we define all the namespaces, we then move onto the xsl:output element (line 6). This enables you to define the final method of output. Here we’re specifying html, but you could equally use XML or Text, for example. The encoding attributes on each element do what they say on the tin. As with all XML, of course, we close every element including the root.
The next stage is to add a template, in this case an <xsl:template /> as can be seen below:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0"
xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<xsl:output method="html" encoding="utf-8"/>
<xsl:template match="/">
<html>
<head>
<title>Making XML beautiful again : Transforming ATOM</title>
</head>
<body>
<xsl:apply-templates select="/atom:feed"/>
</body>
</html>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
The beautiful thing about XSL is its English syntax, if you say it out loud it tends to make sense.
The / value for the match attribute on line 8 is our first example of XPath syntax. The expression / matches any element – so this <xsl:template/> will match against any element in the document. As the first element in any XML document is the root element, this will be the one matched and processed first.
Once we get past our standard start of a HTML document, the only instruction remaining in this <xsl:template/> is to look for and match all <atom:feed/> elements using the <xsl:apply-templates/> in line 14, above.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0"
xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<xsl:output method="html" encoding="utf-8"/>
<xsl:template match="/">
<xsl:apply-templates select="/atom:feed"/>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="/atom:feed">
<div id="content">
<h1>
<xsl:value-of select="atom:title"/>
</h1>
<p>
<xsl:value-of select="atom:subtitle"/>
</p>
<ul id="entries">
<xsl:apply-templates select="atom:entry"/>
</ul>
</div>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
This new template (line 12, above) matches <feed/> and starts to write the new HTML elements out to the output stream. The <xsl:value-of/> does exactly what you’d expect – it finds the value of the item specifed in its select attribute. With XPath you can select any element or attribute from the source XML.
The last part is a repeat of the now familiar <xsl:apply-templates/> from before, but this time we’re using it inside of a called template. Yep, XSL is full of recursion…
<xsl:template match="atom:entry">
<li class="entry">
<h2>
<a href="{atom:link/@href}">
<xsl:value-of select="atom:title"/>
</a>
</h2>
<p class="date">
(<xsl:value-of select="substring-before(atom:updated,'T')"/>)
</p>
<p class="content">
<xsl:value-of select="atom:content" disable-output-escaping="yes"/>
</p>
<xsl:apply-templates select="atom:category"/>
</li>
</xsl:template>
The <xsl:template/> which matches atom:entry (line 1) occurs every time there is a <entry/> element in the source XML file. So in total that is 20 times, this is naturally why XSLT is full of recursion. This <xsl:template/> has been matched and therefore called higher up in the document, so we can start writing list elements directly to the output stream. The first part is simply a <h2/> with a link wrapped within it (lines 3-7). We can select attributes using XPath using @.
The second part of this template selects the date, but performs a XPath string function on it. This means that we only get the date and not the time from the string (line 9). This is achieved by getting only the part of the string that exists before the T.
Regular Expressions are not part of the XPath 1.0 string functions, although XPath 2.0 does include them. Because of this, in XSL we tend to rely heavily on the available XML output.
The third part of the template (line 12) is a <xsl:value-of/> again, but this time we use an attribute of <xsl:value-of/> called disable output escaping to turn escaped characters back into XML.
The very last section is another <xsl:apply-template/> call, taking us three templates deep. Do not worry, it is not uncommon to write XSL which go 20 or more templates deep!
<xsl:template match="atom:category">
<xsl:for-each select=".">
<xsl:element name="a">
<xsl:attribute name="rel">
<xsl:text>tag</xsl:text>
</xsl:attribute>
<xsl:attribute name="href">
<xsl:value-of select="concat(@scheme, @term)"/>
</xsl:attribute>
<xsl:value-of select="@term"/>
</xsl:element>
<xsl:text> </xsl:text>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:template>
In our final <xsl:template/>, we see a combination of what we have done before with a couple of twists. Once we match atom:category we then count how many elements there are at that same level (line 2). The XPath . means ‘self’, so we count how many category elements are within the <entry/> element.
Following that, we start to output a link with a rel attribute of the predefined text, tag (lines 4-6). In XSL you can just type text, but results can end up with strange whitespace if you do (although there are ways to simply remove all whitespace).
The only new XPath function in this example is concat(), which simply combines what XPaths or text there might be in the brackets. We end the output for this tag with an actual tag name (line 10) and we add a space afterwards (line 12) so it won’t touch the next tag. (There are better ways to do this in XSL using the last() XPath function).
After that, we go back to the <xsl:for-each/> element again if there is another category element, otherwise we end the <xsl:for-each/> loop and end this <xsl:template/>.
A touch of style
Because we’re using recursion through our templates, you will find this is the end of the templates and the rest of the XML will be ignored by the parser. Finally, we can add our CSS to finish up. (I have created one for Flickr and another for News feeds)
<style type="text/css" media="screen">@import "flickr_overview.css?v=001";</style>
So we end up with a nice simple to understand but also quick to write XSL which can be used on ATOM Flickr feeds and ATOM News feeds. With a little playing around with XSL, you can make XML beautiful again.
All the files can be found in the zip file (14k) |
2006 |
Ian Forrester |
ianforrester |
2006-12-07T00:00:00+00:00 |
https://24ways.org/2006/beautiful-xml-with-xsl/ |
code |
| 138 |
Rounded Corner Boxes the CSS3 Way |
If you’ve been doing CSS for a while you’ll know that there are approximately 3,762 ways to create a rounded corner box. The simplest techniques rely on the addition of extra mark-up directly to your page, while the more complicated ones add the mark-up though DOM manipulation. While these techniques are all very interesting, they do seem somewhat of a kludge. The goal of CSS is to separate structure from presentation, yet here we are adding superfluous mark-up to our code in order to create a visual effect. The reason we are doing this is simple. CSS2.1 only allows a single background image per element.
Thankfully this looks set to change with the addition of multiple background images into the CSS3 specification. With CSS3 you’ll be able to add not one, not four, but eight background images to a single element. This means you’ll be able to create all kinds of interesting effects without the need of those additional elements.
While the CSS working group still seem to be arguing over the exact syntax, Dave Hyatt went ahead and implemented the currently suggested mechanism into Safari. The technique is fiendishly simple, and I think we’ll all be a lot better off once the W3C stop arguing over the details and allow browser vendors to get on and provide the tools we need to build better websites.
To create a CSS3 rounded corner box, simply start with your box element and apply your 4 corner images, separated by commas.
.box {
background-image: url(top-left.gif), url(top-right.gif), url(bottom-left.gif), url(bottom-right.gif);
}
We don’t want these background images to repeat, which is the normal behaviour, so lets set all their background-repeat properties to no-repeat.
.box {
background-image: url(top-left.gif), url(top-right.gif), url(bottom-left.gif), url(bottom-right.gif);
background-repeat: no-repeat, no-repeat, no-repeat, no-repeat;
}
Lastly, we need to define the positioning of each corner image.
.box {
background-image: url(top-left.gif), url(top-right.gif), url(bottom-left.gif), url(bottom-right.gif);
background-repeat: no-repeat, no-repeat, no-repeat, no-repeat;
background-position: top left, top right, bottom left, bottom right;
}
And there we have it, a simple rounded corner box with no additional mark-up.
As well as using multiple background images, CSS3 also has the ability to create rounded corners without the need of any images at all. You can do this by setting the border-radius property to your desired value as seen in the next example.
.box {
border-radius: 1.6em;
}
This technique currently works in Firefox/Camino and creates a nice, if somewhat jagged rounded corner. If you want to create a box that works in both Mozilla and WebKit based browsers, why not combine both techniques and see what happens. |
2006 |
Andy Budd |
andybudd |
2006-12-04T00:00:00+00:00 |
https://24ways.org/2006/rounded-corner-boxes-the-css3-way/ |
code |
| 139 |
Flickr Photos On Demand with getFlickr |
In case you don’t know it yet, Flickr is great. It is a lot of fun to upload, tag and caption photos and it is really handy to get a vast network of contacts through it.
Using Flickr photos outside of it is a bit of a problem though. There is a Flickr API, and you can get almost every page as an RSS feed, but in general it is a bit tricky to use Flickr photos inside your blog posts or web sites. You might not want to get into the whole API game or use a server side proxy script as you cannot retrieve RSS with Ajax because of the cross-domain security settings.
However, Flickr also provides an undocumented JSON output, that can be used to hack your own solutions in JavaScript without having to use a server side script.
If you enter the URL http://flickr.com/photos/tags/panda you get to the flickr page with photos tagged “panda”.
If you enter the URL http://api.flickr.com/services/feeds/photos_public.gne?tags=panda&format=rss_200 you get the same page as an RSS feed.
If you enter the URL http://api.flickr.com/services/feeds/photos_public.gne?tags=panda&format=json you get a JavaScript function called jsonFlickrFeed with a parameter that contains the same data in JSON format
You can use this to easily hack together your own output by just providing a function with the same name. I wanted to make it easier for you, which is why I created the helper getFlickr for you to download and use.
getFlickr for Non-Scripters
Simply include the javascript file getflickr.js and the style getflickr.css in the head of your document:
<script type="text/javascript" src="getflickr.js"></script>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="getflickr.css" type="text/css">
Once this is done you can add links to Flickr pages anywhere in your document, and when you give them the CSS class getflickrphotos they get turned into gallery links. When a visitor clicks these links they turn into loading messages and show a “popup” gallery with the connected photos once they were loaded. As the JSON returned is very small it won’t take long. You can close the gallery, or click any of the thumbnails to view a photo. Clicking the photo makes it disappear and go back to the thumbnails.
Check out the example page and click the different gallery links to see the results.
Notice that getFlickr works with Unobtrusive JavaScript as when scripting is disabled the links still get to the photos on Flickr.
getFlickr for JavaScript Hackers
If you want to use getFlickr with your own JavaScripts you can use its main method leech():
getFlickr.leech(sTag, sCallback);
sTag
the tag you are looking for
sCallback
an optional function to call when the data was retrieved.
After you called the leech() method you have two strings to use:
getFlickr.html[sTag]
contains an HTML list (without the outer UL element) of all the images linked to the correct pages at flickr. The images are the medium size, you can easily change that by replacing _m.jpg with _s.jpg for thumbnails.
getFlickr.tags[sTag]
contains a string of all the other tags flickr users added with the tag you searched for(space separated)
You can call getFlickr.leech() several times when the page has loaded to cache several result feeds before the page gets loaded. This’ll make the photos quicker for the end user to show up. If you want to offer a form for people to search for flickr photos and display them immediately you can use the following HTML:
<form onsubmit="getFlickr.leech(document.getElementById('tag').value, 'populate');return false">
<label for="tag">Enter Tag</label>
<input type="text" id="tag" name="tag" />
<input type="submit" value="energize" />
<h3>Tags:</h3><div id="tags"></div>
<h3>Photos:</h3><ul id="photos"></ul>
</form>
All the JavaScript you’ll need (for a basic display) is this:
function populate(){
var tag = document.getElementById('tag').value;
document.getElementById('photos').innerHTML = getFlickr.html[tag].replace(/_m\.jpg/g,'_s.jpg');
document.getElementById('tags').innerHTML = getFlickr.tags[tag];
return false;
}
Easy as pie, enjoy!
Check out the example page and try the form to see the results. |
2006 |
Christian Heilmann |
chrisheilmann |
2006-12-03T00:00:00+00:00 |
https://24ways.org/2006/flickr-photos-on-demand/ |
code |
| 143 |
Marking Up a Tag Cloud |
Everyone’s doing it.
The problem is, everyone’s doing it wrong.
Harsh words, you might think. But the crimes against decent markup are legion in this area. You see, I’m something of a markup and semantics junkie. So I’m going to analyse some of the more well-known tag clouds on the internet, explain what’s wrong, and then show you one way to do it better.
del.icio.us
I think the first ever tag cloud I saw was on del.icio.us. Here’s how they mark it up.
<div class="alphacloud">
<a href="/tag/.net" class="lb s2">.net</a>
<a href="/tag/advertising" class=" s3">advertising</a>
<a href="/tag/ajax" class=" s5">ajax</a>
...
</div>
Unfortunately, that is one of the worst examples of tag cloud markup I have ever seen. The page states that a tag cloud is a list of tags where size reflects popularity. However, despite describing it in this way to the human readers, the page’s author hasn’t described it that way in the markup. It isn’t a list of tags, just a bunch of anchors in a <div>. This is also inaccessible because a screenreader will not pause between adjacent links, and in some configurations will not announce the individual links, but rather all of the tags will be read as just one link containing a whole bunch of words. Markup crime number one.
Flickr
Ah, Flickr. The darling photo sharing site of the internet, and the biggest blind spot in every standardista’s vision. Forgive it for having atrocious markup and sometimes confusing UI because it’s just so much damn fun to use. Let’s see what they do.
<p id="TagCloud">
<a href="/photos/tags/06/" style="font-size: 14px;">06</a>
<a href="/photos/tags/africa/" style="font-size: 12px;">africa</a>
<a href="/photos/tags/amsterdam/" style="font-size: 14px;">amsterdam</a>
...
</p>
Again we have a simple collection of anchors like del.icio.us, only this time in a paragraph. But rather than using a class to represent the size of the tag they use an inline style. An inline style using a pixel-based font size. That’s so far away from the goal of separating style from content, they might as well use a <font> tag. You could theoretically parse that to extract the information, but you have more work to guess what the pixel sizes represent. Markup crime number two (and extra jail time for using non-breaking spaces purely for visual spacing purposes.)
Technorati
Ah, now. Here, you’d expect something decent. After all, the Overlord of microformats and King of Semantics Tantek Çelik works there. Surely we’ll see something decent here?
<ol class="heatmap">
<li><em><em><em><em><a href="/tag/Britney+Spears">Britney Spears</a></em></em></em></em></li>
<li><em><em><em><em><em><em><em><em><em><a href="/tag/Bush">Bush</a></em></em></em></em></em></em></em></em></em></li>
<li><em><em><em><em><em><em><em><em><em><em><em><em><em><a href="/tag/Christmas">Christmas</a></em></em></em></em></em></em></em></em></em></em></em></em></em></li>
...
<li><em><em><em><em><em><em><a href="/tag/SEO">SEO</a></em></em></em></em></em></em></li>
<li><em><em><em><em><em><em><em><em><em><em><em><em><em><em><em><a href="/tag/Shopping">Shopping</a></em></em></em></em></em></em></em></em></em></em></em></em></em></em></em></li>
...
</ol>
Unfortunately it turns out not to be that decent, and stop calling me Shirley. It’s not exactly terrible code. It does recognise that a tag cloud is a list of links. And, since they’re in alphabetical order, that it’s an ordered list of links. That’s nice. However … fifteen nested <em> tags? FIFTEEN? That’s emphasis for you. Yes, it is parse-able, but it’s also something of a strange way of looking at emphasis. The HTML spec states that <em> is emphasis, and <strong> is for stronger emphasis. Nesting <em> tags seems counter to the idea that different tags are used for different levels of emphasis. Plus, if you had a screen reader that stressed the voice for emphasis, what would it do? Shout at you? Markup crime number three.
So what should it be?
As del.icio.us tells us, a tag cloud is a list of tags where the size that they are rendered at contains extra information. However, by hiding the extra context purely within the CSS or the HTML tags used, you are denying that context to some users. The basic assumption being made is that all users will be able to see the difference between font sizes, and this is demonstrably false.
A better way to code a tag cloud is to put the context of the cloud within the content, not the markup or CSS alone. As an example, I’m going to take some of my favourite flickr tags and put them into a cloud which communicates the relative frequency of each tag.
To start with a tag cloud in its most basic form is just a list of links. I am going to present them in alphabetical order, so I’ll use an ordered list. Into each list item I add the number of photos I have with that particular tag. The tag itself is linked to the page on flickr which contains those photos. So we end up with this first example. To display this as a traditional tag cloud, we need to alter it in a few ways:
The items need to be displayed next to each other, rather than one-per-line
The context information should be hidden from display (but not from screen readers)
The tag should link to the page of items with that tag
Displaying the items next to each other simply means setting the display of the list elements to inline. The context can be hidden by wrapping it in a <span> and then using the off-left method to hide it. And the link just means adding an anchor (with rel="tag" for some extra microformats bonus points). So, now we have a simple collection of links in our second example.
The last stage is to add the sizes. Since we already have context in our content, the size is purely for visual rendering, so we can just use classes to define the different sizes. For my example, I’ll use a range of class names from not-popular through ultra-popular, in order of smallest to largest, and then use CSS to define different font sizes. If you preferred, you could always use less verbose class names such as size1 through size6. Anyway, adding some classes and CSS gives us our final example, a semantic and more accessible tag cloud. |
2006 |
Mark Norman Francis |
marknormanfrancis |
2006-12-09T00:00:00+00:00 |
https://24ways.org/2006/marking-up-a-tag-cloud/ |
code |