| 220 |
Finding Your Way with Static Maps |
Since the introduction of the Google Maps service in 2005, online maps have taken off in a way not really possible before the invention of slippy map interaction. Although quickly followed by a plethora of similar services from both commercial and non-commercial parties, Google’s first-mover advantage, and easy-to-use developer API saw Google Maps become pretty much the de facto mapping service.
It’s now so easy to add a map to a web page, there’s no reason not to. Dropping an iframe map into your page is as simple as embedding a YouTube video.
But there’s one crucial drawback to both the solution Google provides for you to drop into your page and the code developers typically implement themselves – they don’t work without JavaScript.
A bit about JavaScript
Back in October of this year, The Yahoo! Developer Network blog ran some tests to measure how many visitors to the Yahoo! home page didn’t have JavaScript available or enabled in their browser. It’s an interesting test when you consider that the audience for the Yahoo! home page (one of the most visited pages on the web) represents about as mainstream a sample as you’ll find. If there’s any such thing as an ‘average Web user’ then this is them.
The results surprised me. It varied from region to region, but at most just two per cent of visitors didn’t have JavaScript running. To be honest, I was expecting it to be higher, but this quote from the article caught my attention:
While the percentage of visitors with JavaScript disabled seems like a low number, keep in mind that small percentages of big numbers are also big numbers.
That’s right, of course, and it got me thinking about what that two per cent means. For many sites, two per cent is the number of visitors using the Opera web browser, using IE6, or using Mobile Safari.
So, although a small percentage of the total, users without JavaScript can’t just be forgotten about, and catering for them is at the very heart of how the web is supposed to work.
Starting with content in HTML, we layer on presentation with CSS and then enhance interactivity with JavaScript. If anything fails along the way or the network craps out, or a browser just doesn’t support one of the technologies, the user still gets something they can work with.
It’s progressive enhancement – also known as doing our jobs properly.
Sorry, wasn’t this about maps?
As I was saying, the default code Google provides, and the example code it gives to developers (which typically just gets followed ‘as is’) doesn’t account for users without JavaScript. No JavaScript, no content.
When adding the ability to publish maps to our small content management system Perch, I didn’t want to provide a solution that only worked with JavaScript. I had to go looking for a way to provide maps without JavaScript, too.
There’s a simple solution, fortunately, in the form of static map tiles. All the various slippy map services use a JavaScript interface on top of what are basically rendered map image tiles. Dragging the map loads in more image tiles in the direction you want to view. If you’ve used a slippy map on a slow connection, you’ll be familiar with seeing these tiles load in one by one.
The Static Map API
The good news is that these tiles (or tiles just like them) can be used as regular images on your site. Google has a Static Map API which not only gives you a handy interface to retrieve a tile for the exact area you need, but also allows you to place pins, and zoom and centre the tile so that the image looks just so.
This means that you can create a static, non-JavaScript version of your slippy map’s initial (or ideal) state to load into your page as a regular image, and then have the JavaScript map hijack the image and make it slippy.
Clearly, that’s not going to be a perfect solution for every map’s requirements. It doesn’t allow for panning, zooming or interrogation without JavaScript. However, for the majority of straightforward map uses online, a static map makes a great alternative for those visitors without JavaScript.
Here’s the how
Retrieving a static map tile is staggeringly easy – it’s just a case of forming a URL with the correct arguments and then using that as the src of an image tag.
<img src="http://maps.google.com/maps/api/staticmap
?center=Bethlehem+Israel
&zoom=5
&size=540x280
&maptype=satellite
&markers=color:red|31.4211,35.1144
&sensor=false"
width="540" height="280" alt="Map of Bethlehem, Israel" />
As you can see, there are a few key options that we pass along to the base URL. All of these should be familiar to anyone who’s worked with the JavaScript API.
center determines the point on which the map is centred. This can be latitude and longitude values, or simply an address which is then geocoded.
zoom sets the zoom level.
size is the pixel dimensions of the image you require.
maptype can be roadmap, satellite, terrain or hybrid.
markers sets one or more pin locations. Markers can be labelled, have different colours, and so on – there’s quite a lot of control available.
sensor states whether you are using a sensor to determine the user’s location. When just embedding a map in a web page, set this to false.
There are many options, including plotting paths and setting the image format, which can all be found in the straightforward documentation.
Adding to your page
If you’ve worked with the JavaScript API, you’ll know that it needs a container element which you inject the map into:
<div id="map"></div>
All you need to do is put your static image inside that container:
<div id="map">
<img src="http://maps.google.com/maps/api/staticmap[...]" />
</div>
And then, in your JavaScript, find the image and remove it. For example, with jQuery you’d simply use:
$('#map img').remove();
Why not use a <noscript> element around the image? You could, and that would certainly work fine for browsers that do not support JavaScript. What that won’t cover, however, is the situation where the browser has JavaScript support but, for whatever reason, the JavaScript doesn’t run. This could be due to network issues, an aggressive corporate firewall, or even just a bug in your code. So for that reason, we put the image in for all browsers that show images, and then remove it when the JavaScript is successfully running.
See an example in action
About rate limits
The Google Static Map API limits the requests per site viewer – currently at one thousand distinct maps per day per viewer. So, for most sites you really don’t need to worry about the rate limit. Requests for the same tile aren’t normally counted, as the tile has already been generated and is cached. You can embed the images direct from Google and let it worry about the distribution and caching.
In conclusion
As you can see, adding a static map alongside your dynamic map for those users without JavaScript is very easy indeed. There may not be a huge percentage of web visitors browsing without JavaScript but, as we’ve seen, a small percentage of a big number is still a big number. When it’s so easy to add a static map, can you really justify not doing it? |
2010 |
Drew McLellan |
drewmclellan |
2010-12-01T00:00:00+00:00 |
https://24ways.org/2010/finding-your-way-with-static-maps/ |
code |
| 221 |
“Probably, Maybe, No”: The State of HTML5 Audio |
With the hype around HTML5 and CSS3 exceeding levels not seen since 2005’s Ajax era, it’s worth noting that the excitement comes with good reason: the two specifications render many years of feature hacks redundant by replacing them with native features. For fun, consider how many CSS2-based rounded corners hacks you’ve probably glossed over, looking for a magic solution. These days, with CSS3, the magic is border-radius (and perhaps some vendor prefixes) followed by a coffee break.
CSS3’s border-radius, box-shadow, text-shadow and gradients, and HTML5’s <canvas>, <audio> and <video> are some of the most anticipated features we’ll see put to creative (ab)use as adoption of the ‘new shiny’ grows. Developers jumping on the cutting edge are using subsets of these features to little detriment, in most cases. The more popular CSS features are design flourishes that can degrade nicely, but the current audio and video implementations in particular suffer from a number of annoyances.
The new shiny: how we got here
Sound involves one of the five senses, a key part of daily life for most – and yet it has been strangely absent from HTML and much of the web by default. From a simplistic perspective, it seems odd that HTML did not include support for the full multimedia experience earlier, despite the CD-ROM-based craze of the early 1990s. In truth, standards like HTML can take much longer to bake, but eventually deliver the promise of a lowered barrier to entry, consistent implementations and shiny new features now possible ‘for free’ just about everywhere.
<img> was introduced early and naturally to HTML, despite having some opponents at the time. Perhaps <audio> and <video> were avoided, given the added technical complexity of decoding various multi-frame formats, plus the hardware and bandwidth limitations of the era. Perhaps there were quarrels about choosing a standard format or – more simply – maybe these elements just weren’t considered to be applicable to the HTML-based web at the time. In any event, browser plugins from programs like RealPlayer and QuickTime eventually helped to fill the in-page audio/video gap, handling <object> and <embed> markup which pointed to .wav, .avi, .rm or .mov files. Suffice it to say, the experience was inconsistent at best and, on the standards side of the fence right now, so is HTML5 in terms of audio and video.
: the theory
As far as HTML goes, the code for <audio> is simple and logical. Just as with <img>, a src attribute specifies the file to load. Pretty straightforward – sounds easy, right?
<audio src="mysong.ogg" controls>
<!-- alternate content for unsupported case -->
Download <a href="mysong.ogg">mysong.ogg</a>;
</audio>
Ah, if only it were that simple. The first problem is that the OGG audio format, while ‘free’, is not supported by some browsers. Conversely, nor is MP3, despite being a de facto standard used in all kinds of desktop software (and hardware). In fact, as of November 2010, no single audio format is commonly supported across all major HTML5-enabled browsers.
What you end up writing, then, is something like this:
<audio controls>
<source src="mysong.mp3" />
<source src="mysong.ogg" />
<!-- alternate content for unsupported case, maybe Flash, etc. -->
Download <a href="mysong.ogg">mysong.ogg</a> or <a href="mysong.mp3">mysong.mp3</a>
</audio>
Keep in mind, this is only a ‘first class’ experience for the HTML5 case; also, for non-supported browsers, you may want to look at another inline player (object/embed, or a JavaScript plus Flash API) to have inline audio. You can imagine the added code complexity in the case of supporting ‘first class’ experiences for older browsers, too.
: the caveats
With <img>, you typically don’t have to worry about format support – it just works – and that’s part of what makes a standard wonderful. JPEG, PNG, BMP, GIF, even TIFF images all render just fine if for no better reason, perhaps, than being implemented during the ‘wild west’ days of the web. The situation with <audio> today reflects a very different – read: business-aware – environment in 2010. (Further subtext: There’s a lot of [potential] money involved.) Regrettably, this is a collision of free and commercial interests, where the casualty is ultimately the user. Second up in the casualty list is you, the developer, who has to write additional code around this fragmented support.
The HTML5 audio API as implemented in JavaScript has one of the most un-computer-like responses I’ve ever seen, and inspired the title of this post. Calling new Audio().canPlayType('audio/mp3'), which queries the system for format support according to a MIME type, is supposed to return one of “probably”, “maybe”, or “no”. Sometimes, you’ll just get a null or empty string, which is also fun. A “maybe” response does not guarantee that a format will be supported; sometimes audio/mp3 gives “maybe,” but then audio/mpeg; codecs="mp3" will give a more-solid “probably” response. This can vary by browser or platform, too, depending on native support – and finally, the user may also be able to install codecs, extending support to include other formats. (Are you excited yet?)
Damn you, warring formats!
New market and business opportunities go hand-in-hand with technology developments. What we have here is certainly not failure to communicate; rather, we have competing parties shouting loudly in public in attempts to influence mindshare towards a de facto standard for audio and video. Unfortunately, the current situation means that at least two formats are effectively required to serve the majority of users correctly.
As it currently stands, we have the free and open source software camp of OGG Vorbis/WebM and its proponents (notably, Mozilla, Google and Opera in terms of browser makers), up against the non-free, proprietary and ‘closed’ camp of MP3 and MPEG4/HE-AAC/H.264 – which is where you’ll find commitments from Apple and Microsoft, among others. Apple is likely in with H.264 for the long haul, given its use of the format for its iTunes music store and video offerings.
It is generally held that H.264 is a technically superior format in terms of file size versus quality, but it involves intellectual property and, in many use cases, requires licensing fees. To be fair, there is a business model with H.264 and much has been invested in its development, but this approach is not often the kind that wins over the web. On that front, OGG/WebM may eventually win for being a ‘free’ format that does not involve a licensing scheme.
Closed software and tools ideologically clash with the open nature of the web, which exists largely thanks to free and open technology. Because of philosophical and business reasons, support for audio and video is fragmented across browsers adopting HTML5 features. It does not help that a large amount of audio and video currently exists in non-free MP3 and MPEG-4 formats. Adoption of <audio> and <video> may be slowed, since it is more complex than <img> and may feel ‘broken’ to developers when edge cases are encountered. Furthermore, the HTML5 spec does not mandate a single required format. The end result is that, as a developer, you must currently provide at least both MP3 and OGG, for example, to serve most existing HTML5-based user agents.
Transitioning to
There will be some growing pains as developers start to pick up the new HTML5 shiny, while balancing the needs of current and older agents that don’t support either <audio> or the preferred format you may choose (for example, MP3). In either event, Flash or other plugins can be used as done traditionally within HTML4 documents to embed and play the relevant audio.
The SoundManager 2 page player demo in action.
Ideally, HTML5 audio should be used whenever possible with Flash as the backup option. A few JavaScript/Flash-based audio player projects exist which balance the two; in attempting to tackle this problem, I develop and maintain SoundManager 2, a JavaScript sound API which transparently uses HTML5 Audio() and, if needed, Flash for playing audio files. The internals can get somewhat ugly, but the transition between HTML4 and HTML5 is going to be just that – and even with HTML5, you will need some form of format fall-back in addition to graceful degradation.
It may be safest to fall back to MP3/MP4 formats for inline playback at this time, given wide support via Flash, some HTML5-based browsers and mobile devices. Considering the amount of MP3/MP4 media currently available, it is wiser to try these before falling through to a traditional file download process.
Early findings
Here is a brief list of behavioural notes, annoyances, bugs, quirks and general weirdness I have found while playing with HTML5-based audio at time of writing (November 2010):
Apple iPad/iPhone (iOS 4, iPad 3.2+)
Only one sound can be played at a time. If a second sound starts, the first is stopped.
No auto-play allowed. Sounds follow the pop-up window security model and can only be started from within a user event handler such as onclick/touch, and so on. Otherwise, playback attempts silently fail.
Once started, a sequence of sounds can be created or played via the ‘finish’ event of the previous sound (for example, advancing through a playlist without interaction after first track starts).
iPad, iOS 3.2: Occasional ‘infinite loop’ bug seen where audio does not complete and stop at a sound’s logical end – instead, it plays again from the beginning. Might be specific to example file format (HE-AAC) encoded from iTunes.
Apple Safari, OS X Snow Leopard 10.6.5
Critical bug: Safari 4 and 5 intermittently fail to load or play HTML5 audio on Snow Leopard due to bug(s) in QuickTime X and/or other underlying frameworks. Known Apple ‘radar’ bug: bugs.webkit.org #32159 (see also, test case.) Amusing side note: Safari on Windows is fine.
Apple Safari, Windows
Food for thought: if you download “Safari” alone on Windows, you will not get HTML5 audio/video support (tested in WinXP). You need to download “Safari + QuickTime” to get HTML5 audio/video support within Safari. (As far as I’m aware, Chrome, Firefox and Opera either include decoders or use system libraries accordingly. Presumably IE 9 will use OS-level APIs.)
General Quirks
Seeking and loading, ‘progress’ events, and calculating bytes loaded versus bytes total should not be expected to be linear, as users can arbitrarily seek within a sound. It appears that some support for HTTP ranges exists, which adds a bit of logic to UI code. Browsers seem to vary slightly in their current implementations of these features.
The onload event of a sound may be of little relevance, if non-linear loading is involved (see above note re: seeking).
Interestingly (perhaps I missed it), the current spec does not seem to specify a panning or left/right channel mix option.
The preload attribute values may vary slightly between browsers at this time.
Upcoming shiny: HTML5 Audio Data API
With access to audio data, you can incorporate waveform and spectrum elements that make your designs react to music.
The HTML5 audio spec does a good job covering the basics of playback, but did not initially get into manipulation or generation of audio on-the-fly, something Flash has had for a number of years now. What if JavaScript could create, monitor and change audio dynamically, like a sort of audio <canvas> element? With that kind of capability, many dynamic audio processing features become feasible and, when combined with other media, can make for some impressive demos.
What started as a small idea among a small group of audio and programming enthusiasts grew to inspire a W3C audio incubator group, and continued to establish the Mozilla Audio Data API. Contributors wrote a patch for Firefox which was reviewed and revised, and is now slated to be in the public release of Firefox 4. Some background and demos are also detailed in an article from the BBC R&D blog.
There are plenty of live demos to see, which give an impression of the new creative ideas this API enables. Many concepts are not new in themselves, but it is exciting to see this sort of thing happening within the native browser context.
Mozilla is not alone in this effort; the WebKit folks are also working on a JavaScriptAudioNode interface, which implements similar audio buffering and sample elements.
The future?
It is my hope that we’ll see a common format emerge in terms of support across the major browsers for both audio and video; otherwise, support will continue to be fragmented and mildly frustrating to develop for, and that can impede growth of the feature. It’s a big call, but if <img> had lacked a common format back in the wild west era, I doubt the web would have grown to where it is today.
Complaints and nitpicks aside, HTML5 brings excellent progress on the browser multimedia front, and the first signs of native support are a welcome improvement given all audio and video previously relied on plugins. There is good reason to be excited. While there is room for more, support could certainly be much worse – and as tends to happen with specifications, the implementations targeting them should improve over time.
Note: Thanks to Nate Koechley, who suggested the Audio().canPlayType() response be part of the article title. |
2010 |
Scott Schiller |
scottschiller |
2010-12-08T00:00:00+00:00 |
https://24ways.org/2010/the-state-of-html5-audio/ |
code |
| 223 |
Calculating Color Contrast |
Some websites and services allow you to customize your profile by uploading pictures, changing the background color or other aspects of the design. As a customer, this personalization turns a web app into your little nest where you store your data. As a designer, letting your customers have free rein over the layout and design is a scary prospect. So what happens to all the stock text and images that are designed to work on nice white backgrounds? Even the Mac only lets you choose between two colors for the OS, blue or graphite! Opening up the ability to customize your site’s color scheme can be a recipe for disaster unless you are flexible and understand how to find maximum color contrasts.
In this article I will walk you through two simple equations to determine if you should be using white or black text depending on the color of the background. The equations are both easy to implement and produce similar results. It isn’t a matter of which is better, but more the fact that you are using one at all! That way, even with the craziest of Geocities color schemes that your customers choose, at least your text will still be readable.
Let’s have a look at a range of various possible colors. Maybe these are pre-made color schemes, corporate colors, or plucked from an image.
Now that we have these potential background colors and their hex values, we need to find out whether the corresponding text should be in white or black, based on which has a higher contrast, therefore affording the best readability. This can be done at runtime with JavaScript or in the back-end before the HTML is served up.
There are two functions I want to compare. The first, I call ’50%’. It takes the hex value and compares it to the value halfway between pure black and pure white. If the hex value is less than half, meaning it is on the darker side of the spectrum, it returns white as the text color. If the result is greater than half, it’s on the lighter side of the spectrum and returns black as the text value.
In PHP:
function getContrast50($hexcolor){
return (hexdec($hexcolor) > 0xffffff/2) ? 'black':'white';
}
In JavaScript:
function getContrast50(hexcolor){
return (parseInt(hexcolor, 16) > 0xffffff/2) ? 'black':'white';
}
It doesn’t get much simpler than that! The function converts the six-character hex color into an integer and compares that to one half the integer value of pure white. The function is easy to remember, but is naive when it comes to understanding how we perceive parts of the spectrum. Different wavelengths have greater or lesser impact on the contrast.
The second equation is called ‘YIQ’ because it converts the RGB color space into YIQ, which takes into account the different impacts of its constituent parts. Again, the equation returns white or black and it’s also very easy to implement.
In PHP:
function getContrastYIQ($hexcolor){
$r = hexdec(substr($hexcolor,0,2));
$g = hexdec(substr($hexcolor,2,2));
$b = hexdec(substr($hexcolor,4,2));
$yiq = (($r*299)+($g*587)+($b*114))/1000;
return ($yiq >= 128) ? 'black' : 'white';
}
In JavaScript:
function getContrastYIQ(hexcolor){
var r = parseInt(hexcolor.substr(0,2),16);
var g = parseInt(hexcolor.substr(2,2),16);
var b = parseInt(hexcolor.substr(4,2),16);
var yiq = ((r*299)+(g*587)+(b*114))/1000;
return (yiq >= 128) ? 'black' : 'white';
}
You’ll notice first that we have broken down the hex value into separate RGB values. This is important because each of these channels is scaled in accordance to its visual impact. Once everything is scaled and normalized, it will be in a range between zero and 255. Much like the previous ’50%’ function, we now need to check if the input is above or below halfway. Depending on where that value is, we’ll return the corresponding highest contrasting color.
That’s it: two simple contrast equations which work really well to determine the best readability.
If you are interested in learning more, the W3C has a few documents about color contrast and how to determine if there is enough contrast between any two colors. This is important for accessibility to make sure there is enough contrast between your text and link colors and the background.
There is also a great article by Kevin Hale on Particletree about his experience with choosing light or dark themes. To round it out, Jonathan Snook created a color contrast picker which allows you to play with RGB sliders to get values for YIQ, contrast and others. That way you can quickly fiddle with the knobs to find the right balance.
Comparing results
Let’s revisit our color schemes and see which text color is recommended for maximum contrast based on these two equations.
If we use the simple ’50%’ contrast function, we can see that it recommends black against all the colors except the dark green and purple on the second row. In general, the equation feels the colors are light and that black is a better choice for the text.
The more complex ‘YIQ’ function, with its weighted colors, has slightly different suggestions. White text is still recommended for the very dark colors, but there are some surprises. The red and pink values show white text rather than black. This equation takes into account the weight of the red value and determines that the hue is dark enough for white text to show the most contrast.
As you can see, the two contrast algorithms agree most of the time. There are some instances where they conflict, but overall you can use the equation that you prefer. I don’t think it is a major issue if some edge-case colors get one contrast over another, they are still very readable.
Now let’s look at some common colors and then see how the two functions compare. You can quickly see that they do pretty well across the whole spectrum.
In the first few shades of grey, the white and black contrasts make sense, but as we test other colors in the spectrum, we do get some unexpected deviation. Pure red #FF0000 has a flip-flop. This is due to how the ‘YIQ’ function weights the RGB parts. While you might have a personal preference for one style over another, both are justifiable.
In this second round of colors, we go deeper into the spectrum, off the beaten track. Again, most of the time the contrasting algorithms are in sync, but every once in a while they disagree. You can select which you prefer, neither of which is unreadable.
Conclusion
Contrast in color is important, especially if you cede all control and take a hands-off approach to the design. It is important to select smart defaults by making the contrast between colors as high as possible. This makes it easier for your customers to read, increases accessibility and is generally just easier on the eyes.
Sure, there are plenty of other equations out there to determine contrast; what is most important is that you pick one and implement it into your system.
So, go ahead and experiment with color in your design. You now know how easy it is to guarantee that your text will be the most readable in any circumstance. |
2010 |
Brian Suda |
briansuda |
2010-12-24T00:00:00+00:00 |
https://24ways.org/2010/calculating-color-contrast/ |
code |
| 231 |
Designing for iOS: Life Beyond Media Queries |
Although not a new phenomenon, media queries seem to be getting a lot attention online recently and for the right reasons too – it’s great to be able to adapt a design with just a few lines of CSS – but many people are relying only on them to create an iPhone-specific version of their website.
I was pleased to hear at FOWD NYC a few weeks ago that both myself and Aral Balkan share the same views on why media queries aren’t always going to be the best solution for mobile. Both of us specialise in iPhone design ourselves and we opt for a different approach to media queries. The trouble is, regardless of what you have carefully selected to be display:none; in your CSS, the iPhone still loads everything in the background; all that large imagery for your full scale website also takes up valuable mobile bandwidth and time.
You can greatly increase the speed of your website by creating a specific site tailored to mobile users with just a few handy pointers – media queries, in some instances, might be perfectly suitable but, in others, here’s what you can do.
Redirect your iPhone/iPod Touch users
To detect whether someone is viewing your site on an iPhone or iPod Touch, you can either use JavaScript or PHP.
The JavaScript
if((navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone/i)) || (navigator.userAgent.match(/iPod/i))) {
if (document.cookie.indexOf("iphone_redirect=false") == -1) window.location = "http://mobile.yoursitehere.com";
}
The PHP
if(strstr($_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT'],'iPhone') || strstr($_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT'],'iPod'))
{
header('Location: http://mobile.yoursitehere.com');
exit();
}
Both of these methods redirect the user to a site that you have made specifically for the iPhone. At this point, be sure to provide a link to the full version of the website, in case the user wishes to view this and not be thrown into an experience they didn’t want, with no way back.
Tailoring your site
So, now you’ve got 320 × 480 pixels of screen to play with – and to create a style sheet for, just as you would for any other site you build. There are a few other bits and pieces that you can add to your code to create a site that feels more like a fully immersive iPhone app rather than a website.
Retina display
When building your website specifically tailored to the iPhone, you might like to go one step further and create a specific style sheet for iPhone 4’s Retina display. Because there are four times as many pixels on the iPhone 4 (640 × 960 pixels), you’ll find specifics such as text shadows and borders will have to be increased.
<link rel="stylesheet"
media="only screen and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2)"
type="text/css" href="../iphone4.css" />
(Credit to Thomas Maier)
Prevent user scaling
This declaration, added into the <head>, stops the user being able to pinch-zoom in and out of your design, which is perfect if you are designing to the exact pixel measurements of the iPhone screen.
<meta name="viewport"
content="width=device-width; initial-scale=1.0; maximum-scale=1.0;">
Designing for orientation
As iPhones aren’t static devices, you’ll also need to provide a style sheet for horizontal orientation. We can do this by inserting some JavaScript into the <head> as follows:
<script type="text/javascript">
function orient() {
switch(window.orientation) {
case 0:
document.getElementById("orient_css").href = "css/iphone_portrait.css";
break;
case -90:
document.getElementById("orient_css").href = "css/iphone_landscape.css";
break;
case 90:
document.getElementById("orient_css").href = "css/iphone_landscape.css";
break;
}
}
window.onload = orient();
</script>
You can also specify orientation styles using media queries. This is absolutely fine, as by this point you’ll already be working with mobile-specific graphics and have little need to set a lot of things to display:none;
<link rel="stylesheet"
media="only screen and (max-device-width: 480px)" href="/iphone.css">
<link rel="stylesheet"
media="only screen and (orientation: portrait)" href="/portrait.css">
<link rel="stylesheet"
media="only screen and (orientation: landscape)” href="/landscape.css">
Remove the address and status bars, top and bottom
To give you more room on-screen and to make your site feel more like an immersive web app, you can place the following declaration into the <head> of your document’s code to remove the address and status bars at the top and bottom of the screen.
<meta name="apple-mobile-web-app-capable" content="yes" />
Making the most of inbuilt functions
Similar to mailto: e-mail links, the iPhone also supports another two handy URI schemes which are great for enhancing contact details. When tapped, the following links will automatically bring up the appropriate call or text interface:
<a href="tel:01234567890">Call us</a>
<a href="sms:01234567890">Text us</a>
iPhone-specific Web Clip icon
Although I believe them to be fundamentally flawed, since they rely on the user bookmarking your site, iPhone Web Clip icons are still a nice touch. You need just two declarations, again in the <head> of your document:
<link rel="apple-touch-icon" href="icons/regular_icon.png" />
<link rel="apple-touch-icon" sizes="114x114" href="icons/retina_icon.png" />
For iPhone 4 you’ll need to create a 114 × 114 pixels icon; for a non-Retina display, a 57 × 57 pixels icon will do the trick.
Precomposed
Apple adds its standard gloss ‘moon’ over the top of any icon. If you feel this might be too much for your particular icon and would prefer a matte finish, you can add precomposed to the end of the apple-touch-icon declaration to remove the standard gloss.
<link rel="apple-touch-icon-precomposed" href="/images/touch-icon.png" />
Wrapping up
Media queries definitely have their uses. They make it easy to build a custom experience for your visitor, regardless of their browser’s size. For more complex sites, however, or where you have lots of imagery and other content that isn’t necessary on the mobile version, you can now use these other methods to help you out. Remember, they are purely for presentation and not optimisation; for busy people on the go, optimisation and faster-running mobile experiences can only be a good thing.
Have a wonderful Christmas fellow Webbies! |
2010 |
Sarah Parmenter |
sarahparmenter |
2010-12-17T00:00:00+00:00 |
https://24ways.org/2010/life-beyond-media-queries/ |
code |
| 233 |
Wrapping Things Nicely with HTML5 Local Storage |
HTML5 is here to turn the web from a web of hacks into a web of applications – and we are well on the way to this goal. The coming year will be totally and utterly awesome if you are excited about web technologies.
This year the HTML5 revolution started and there is no stopping it. For the first time all the browser vendors are rallying together to make a technology work. The new browser war is fought over implementation of the HTML5 standard and not over random additions. We live in exciting times.
Starting with a bang
As with every revolution there is a lot of noise with bangs and explosions, and that’s the stage we’re at right now. HTML5 showcases are often CSS3 showcases, web font playgrounds, or video and canvas examples.
This is great, as it gets people excited and it gives the media something to show. There is much more to HTML5, though. Let’s take a look at one of the less sexy, but amazingly useful features of HTML5 (it was in the HTML5 specs, but grew at such an alarming rate that it warranted its own spec): storing information on the client-side.
Why store data on the client-side?
Storing information in people’s browsers affords us a few options that every application should have:
You can retain the state of an application – when the user comes back after closing the browser, everything will be as she left it. That’s how ‘real’ applications work and this is how the web ones should, too.
You can cache data – if something doesn’t change then there is no point in loading it over the Internet if local access is so much faster
You can store user preferences – without needing to keep that data on your server at all.
In the past, storing local data wasn’t much fun.
The pain of hacky browser solutions
In the past, all we had were cookies. I don’t mean the yummy things you get with your coffee, endorsed by the blue, furry junkie in Sesame Street, but the other, digital ones. Cookies suck – it isn’t fun to have an unencrypted HTTP overhead on every server request for storing four kilobytes of data in a cryptic format. It was OK for 1994, but really neither an easy nor a beautiful solution for the task of storing data on the client.
Then came a plethora of solutions by different vendors – from Microsoft’s userdata to Flash’s LSO, and from Silverlight isolated storage to Google’s Gears. If you want to know just how many crazy and convoluted ways there are to store a bit of information, check out Samy’s evercookie.
Clearly, we needed an easier and standardised way of storing local data.
Keeping it simple – local storage
And, lo and behold, we have one. The local storage API (or session storage, with the only difference being that session data is lost when the window is closed) is ridiculously easy to use. All you do is call a few methods on the window.localStorage object – or even just set the properties directly using the square bracket notation:
if('localStorage' in window && window['localStorage'] !== null){
var store = window.localStorage;
// valid, API way
store.setItem(‘cow’,‘moo’);
console.log(
store.getItem(‘cow’)
); // => ‘moo’
// shorthand, breaks at keys with spaces
store.sheep = ‘baa’
console.log(
store.sheep
); // ‘baa’
// shorthand for all
store[‘dog’] = ‘bark’
console.log(
store[‘dog’]
); // => ‘bark’
}
Browser support is actually pretty good: Chrome 4+; Firefox 3.5+; IE8+; Opera 10.5+; Safari 4+; plus iPhone 2.0+; and Android 2.0+. That should cover most of your needs. Of course, you should check for support first (or use a wrapper library like YUI Storage Utility or YUI Storage Lite).
The data is stored on a per domain basis and you can store up to five megabytes of data in localStorage for each domain.
Strings attached
By default, localStorage only supports strings as storage formats. You can’t store results of JavaScript computations that are arrays or objects, and every number is stored as a string. This means that long, floating point numbers eat into the available memory much more quickly than if they were stored as numbers.
var cowdesc = "the cow is of the bovine ilk, "+
"one end is for the moo, the "+
"other for the milk";
var cowdef = {
ilk“bovine”,
legs,
udders,
purposes
front“moo”,
end“milk”
}
};
window.localStorage.setItem(‘describecow’,cowdesc);
console.log(
window.localStorage.getItem(‘describecow’)
); // => the cow is of the bovine…
window.localStorage.setItem(‘definecow’,cowdef);
console.log(
window.localStorage.getItem(‘definecow’)
); // => [object Object] = bad!
This limits what you can store quite heavily, which is why it makes sense to use JSON to encode and decode the data you store:
var cowdef = {
"ilk":"bovine",
"legs":4,
"udders":4,
"purposes":{
"front":"moo",
"end":"milk"
}
};
window.localStorage.setItem(‘describecow’,JSON.stringify(cowdef));
console.log(
JSON.parse(
window.localStorage.getItem(‘describecow’)
)
); // => Object { ilk=“bovine”, more…}
You can also come up with your own formatting solutions like CSV, or pipe | or tilde ~ separated formats, but JSON is very terse and has native browser support.
Some use case examples
The simplest use of localStorage is, of course, storing some data: the current state of a game; how far through a multi-form sign-up process a user is; and other things we traditionally stored in cookies. Using JSON, though, we can do cooler things.
Speeding up web service use and avoiding exceeding the quota
A lot of web services only allow you a certain amount of hits per hour or day, and can be very slow. By using localStorage with a time stamp, you can cache results of web services locally and only access them after a certain time to refresh the data.
I used this technique in my An Event Apart 10K entry, World Info, to only load the massive dataset of all the world information once, and allow for much faster subsequent visits to the site. The following screencast shows the difference:
For use with YQL (remember last year’s 24 ways entry?), I’ve built a small script called YQL localcache that wraps localStorage around the YQL data call. An example would be the following:
yqlcache.get({
yql: 'select * from flickr.photos.search where text="santa"',
id: 'myphotos',
cacheage: ( 60*60*1000 ),
callback: function(data) {
console.log(data);
}
});
This loads photos of Santa from Flickr and stores them for an hour in the key myphotos of localStorage. If you call the function at various times, you receive an object back with the YQL results in a data property and a type property which defines where the data came from – live is live data, cached means it comes from cache, and freshcache indicates that it was called for the first time and a new cache was primed. The cache will work for an hour (60×60×1,000 milliseconds) and then be refreshed. So, instead of hitting the YQL endpoint over and over again, you hit it once per hour.
Caching a full interface
Another use case I found was to retain the state of a whole interface of an application by caching the innerHTML once it has been rendered. I use this in the Yahoo Firehose search interface, and you can get the full story about local storage and how it is used in this screencast:
The stripped down code is incredibly simple (JavaScript with PHP embed):
// test for localStorage support
if(('localStorage' in window) && window['localStorage'] !== null){
var f = document.getElementById(‘mainform’);
// test with PHP if the form was sent (the submit button has the name “sent”)
// get the HTML of the form and cache it in the property “state”
localStorage.setItem(‘state’,f.innerHTML);
// if the form hasn’t been sent…
// check if a state property exists and write back the HTML cache
if(‘state’ in localStorage){
f.innerHTML = localStorage.getItem(‘state’);
}
}
Other ideas
In essence, you can use local storage every time you need to speed up access. For example, you could store image sprites in base-64 encoded datasets instead of loading them from a server. Or you could store CSS and JavaScript libraries on the client. Anything goes – have a play.
Issues with local and session storage
Of course, not all is rainbows and unicorns with the localStorage API. There are a few niggles that need ironing out. As with anything, this needs people to use the technology and raise issues. Here are some of the problems:
Inadequate information about storage quota – if you try to add more content to an already full store, you get a QUOTA_EXCEEDED_ERR and that’s it. There’s a great explanation and test suite for localStorage quota available.
Lack of automatically expiring storage – a feature that cookies came with. Pamela Fox has a solution (also available as a demo and source code)
Lack of encrypted storage – right now, everything is stored in readable strings in the browser.
Bigger, better, faster, more!
As cool as the local and session storage APIs are, they are not quite ready for extensive adoption – the storage limits might get in your way, and if you really want to go to town with accessing, filtering and sorting data, real databases are what you’ll need. And, as we live in a world of client-side development, people are moving from heavy server-side databases like MySQL to NoSQL environments.
On the web, there is also a lot of work going on, with Ian Hickson of Google proposing the Web SQL database, and Nikunj Mehta, Jonas Sicking (Mozilla), Eliot Graff (Microsoft) and Andrei Popescu (Google) taking the idea beyond simply replicating MySQL and instead offering Indexed DB as an even faster alternative.
On the mobile front, a really important feature is to be able to store data to use when you are offline (mobile coverage and roaming data plans anybody?) and you can use the Offline Webapps API for that.
As I mentioned at the beginning, we have a very exciting time ahead – let’s make this web work faster and more reliably by using what browsers offer us. For more on local storage, check out the chapter on Dive into HTML5. |
2010 |
Christian Heilmann |
chrisheilmann |
2010-12-06T00:00:00+00:00 |
https://24ways.org/2010/html5-local-storage/ |
code |
| 234 |
An Introduction to CSS 3-D Transforms |
Ladies and gentlemen, it is the second decade of the third millennium and we are still kicking around the same 2-D interface we got three decades ago. Sure, Apple debuted a few apps for OSX 10.7 that have a couple more 3-D flourishes, and Microsoft has had that Flip 3D for a while. But c’mon – 2011 is right around the corner. That’s Twenty Eleven, folks. Where is our 3-D virtual reality? By now, we should be zipping around the Metaverse on super-sonic motorbikes.
Granted, the capability of rendering complex 3-D environments has been present for years. On the web, there are already several solutions: Flash; three.js in <canvas>; and, eventually, WebGL. Finally, we meagre front-end developers have our own three-dimensional jewel: CSS 3-D transforms!
Rationale
Like a beautiful jewel, 3-D transforms can be dazzling, a true spectacle to behold. But before we start tacking 3-D diamonds and rubies to our compositions like Liberace‘s tailor, we owe it to our users to ask how they can benefit from this awesome feature.
An entire application should not take advantage of 3-D transforms. CSS was built to style documents, not generate explorable environments. I fail to find a benefit to completing a web form that can be accessed by swivelling my viewport to the Sign-Up Room (although there have been proposals to make the web just that). Nevertheless, there are plenty of opportunities to use 3-D transforms in between interactions with the interface, via transitions.
Take, for instance, the Weather App on the iPhone. The application uses two views: a details view; and an options view. Switching between these two views is done with a 3-D flip transition. This informs the user that the interface has two – and only two – views, as they can exist only on either side of the same plane.
Flipping from details view to options view via a 3-D transition
Also, consider slide shows. When you’re looking at the last slide, what cues tip you off that advancing will restart the cycle at the first slide? A better paradigm might be achieved with a 3-D transform, placing the slides side-by-side in a circle (carousel) in three-dimensional space; in that arrangement, the last slide obviously comes before the first.
3-D transforms are more than just eye candy. We can also use them to solve dilemmas and make our applications more intuitive.
Current support
The CSS 3D Transforms module has been out in the wild for over a year now. Currently, only Safari supports the specification – which includes Safari on Mac OS X and Mobile Safari on iOS.
The support roadmap for other browsers varies. The Mozilla team has taken some initial steps towards implementing the module. Mike Taylor tells me that the Opera team is keeping a close eye on CSS transforms, and is waiting until the specification is fleshed out. And our best friend Internet Explorer still needs to catch up to 2-D transforms before we can talk about the 3-D variety.
To make matters more perplexing, Safari’s WebKit cousin Chrome currently accepts 3-D transform declarations, but renders them in 2-D space. Chrome team member Paul Irish, says that 3-D transforms are on the horizon, perhaps in one of the next 8.0 releases.
This all adds up to a bit of a challenge for those of us excited by 3-D transforms. I’ll give it to you straight: missing the dimension of depth can make degradation a bit ungraceful. Unless the transform is relatively simple and holds up in non-3D-supporting browsers, you’ll most likely have to design another solution. But what’s another hurdle in a steeplechase? We web folk have had our mettle tested for years. We’re prepared to devise multiple solutions.
Here’s the part of the article where I mention Modernizr, and you brush over it because you’ve read this part of an article hundreds of times before. But seriously, it’s the best way to test for CSS 3-D transform support. Use it.
Even with these difficulties mounting up, trying out 3-D transforms today is the right move. The CSS 3-D transforms module was developed by the same team at Apple that produced the CSS 2D Transforms and Animation modules. Both specifications have since been adopted by Mozilla and Opera. Transforming in three-dimensions now will guarantee you’ll be ahead of the game when the other browsers catch up.
The choice is yours. You can make excuses and pooh-pooh 3-D transforms because they’re too hard and only snobby Apple fans will see them today. Or, with a tip of the fedora to Mr Andy Clarke, you can get hard-boiled and start designing with the best features out there right this instant.
So, I bid you, in the words of the eternal Optimus Prime…
Transform and roll out.
Let’s get coding.
Perspective
To activate 3-D space, an element needs perspective. This can be applied in two ways: using the transform property, with the perspective as a functional notation:
-webkit-transform: perspective(600);
or using the perspective property:
-webkit-perspective: 600;
See example: Perspective 1.
The red element on the left uses transform: perspective() functional notation; the blue element on the right uses the perspective property
These two formats both trigger a 3-D space, but there is a difference. The first, functional notation is convenient for directly applying a 3-D transform on a single element (in the previous example, I use it in conjunction with a rotateY transform). But when used on multiple elements, the transformed elements don’t line up as expected. If you use the same transform across elements with different positions, each element will have its own vanishing point. To remedy this, use the perspective property on a parent element, so each child shares the same 3-D space.
See Example: Perspective 2.
Each red box on the left has its own vanishing point within the parent container; the blue boxes on the right share the vanishing point of the parent container
The value of perspective determines the intensity of the 3-D effect. Think of it as a distance from the viewer to the object. The greater the value, the further the distance, so the less intense the visual effect. perspective: 2000; yields a subtle 3-D effect, as if we were viewing an object from far away. perspective: 100; produces a tremendous 3-D effect, like a tiny insect viewing a massive object.
By default, the vanishing point for a 3-D space is positioned at its centre. You can change the position of the vanishing point with perspective-origin property.
-webkit-perspective-origin: 25% 75%;
See Example: Perspective 3.
3-D transform functions
As a web designer, you’re probably well acquainted with working in two dimensions, X and Y, positioning items horizontally and vertically. With a 3-D space initialised with perspective, we can now transform elements in all three glorious spatial dimensions, including the third Z dimension, depth.
3-D transforms use the same transform property used for 2-D transforms. If you’re familiar with 2-D transforms, you’ll find the basic 3D transform functions fairly similar.
rotateX(angle)
rotateY(angle)
rotateZ(angle)
translateZ(tz)
scaleZ(sz)
Whereas translateX() positions an element along the horizontal X-axis, translateZ() positions it along the Z-axis, which runs front to back in 3-D space. Positive values position the element closer to the viewer, negative values further away.
The rotate functions rotate the element around the corresponding axis. This is somewhat counter-intuitive at first, as you might imagine that rotateX will spin an object left to right. Instead, using rotateX(45deg) rotates an element around the horizontal X-axis, so the top of the element angles back and away, and the bottom gets closer to the viewer.
See Example: Transforms 1.
3-D rotate() and translate() functions around each axis
There are also several shorthand transform functions that require values for all three dimensions:
translate3d(tx,ty,tz)
scale3d(sx,sy,sz)
rotate3d(rx,ry,rz,angle)
Pro-tip: These foo3d() transform functions also have the benefit of triggering hardware acceleration in Safari. Dean Jackson, CSS 3-D transform spec author and main WebKit dude, writes (to Thomas Fuchs):
In essence, any transform that has a 3D operation as one of its functions will trigger hardware compositing, even when the actual transform is 2D, or not doing anything at all (such as translate3d(0,0,0)). Note this is just current behaviour, and could change in the future (which is why we don’t document or encourage it). But it is very helpful in some situations and can significantly improve redraw performance.
For the sake of simplicity, my demos will use the basic transform functions, but if you’re writing production-ready CSS for iOS or Safari-only, make sure to use the foo3d() functions to get the best rendering performance.
Card flip
We now have all the tools to start making 3-D objects. Let’s get started with something simple: flipping a card.
Here’s the basic markup we’ll need:
<section class="container">
<div id="card">
<figure class="front">1</figure>
<figure class="back">2</figure>
</div>
</section>
The .container will house the 3-D space. The #card acts as a wrapper for the 3-D object. Each face of the card has a separate element: .front; and .back. Even for such a simple object, I recommend using this same pattern for any 3-D transform. Keeping the 3-D space element and the object element(s) separate establishes a pattern that is simple to understand and easier to style.
We’re ready for some 3-D stylin’. First, apply the necessary perspective to the parent 3-D space, along with any size or positioning styles.
.container {
width: 200px;
height: 260px;
position: relative;
-webkit-perspective: 800;
}
Now the #card element can be transformed in its parent’s 3-D space. We’re combining absolute and relative positioning so the 3-D object is removed from the flow of the document. We’ll also add width: 100%; and height: 100%;. This ensures the object’s transform-origin will occur in the centre of .container. More on transform-origin later.
Let’s add a CSS3 transition so users can see the transform take effect.
#card {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
position: absolute;
-webkit-transform-style: preserve-3d;
-webkit-transition: -webkit-transform 1s;
}
The .container’s perspective only applies to direct descendant children, in this case #card. In order for subsequent children to inherit a parent’s perspective, and live in the same 3-D space, the parent can pass along its perspective with transform-style: preserve-3d. Without 3-D transform-style, the faces of the card would be flattened with its parents and the back face’s rotation would be nullified.
To position the faces in 3-D space, we’ll need to reset their positions in 2-D with position: absolute. In order to hide the reverse sides of the faces when they are faced away from the viewer, we use backface-visibility: hidden.
#card figure {
display: block;
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
-webkit-backface-visibility: hidden;
}
To flip the .back face, we add a basic 3-D transform of rotateY(180deg).
#card .front {
background: red;
}
#card .back {
background: blue;
-webkit-transform: rotateY(180deg);
}
With the faces in place, the #card requires a corresponding style for when it is flipped.
#card.flipped {
-webkit-transform: rotateY(180deg);
}
Now we have a working 3-D object. To flip the card, we can toggle the flipped class. When .flipped, the #card will rotate 180 degrees, thus exposing the .back face.
See Example: Card 1.
Flipping a card in three dimensions
Slide-flip
Take another look at the Weather App 3-D transition. You’ll notice that it’s not quite the same effect as our previous demo. If you follow the right edge of the card, you’ll find that its corners stay within the container. Instead of pivoting from the horizontal centre, it pivots on that right edge. But the transition is not just a rotation – the edge moves horizontally from right to left. We can reproduce this transition just by modifying a couple of lines of CSS from our original card flip demo.
The pivot point for the rotation occurs at the right side of the card. By default, the transform-origin of an element is at its horizontal and vertical centre (50% 50% or center center). Let’s change it to the right side:
#card { -webkit-transform-origin: right center; }
That flip now needs some horizontal movement with translateX. We’ll set the rotation to -180deg so it flips right side out.
#card.flipped {
-webkit-transform: translateX(-100%) rotateY(-180deg);
}
See Example: Card 2.
Creating a slide-flip from the right edge of the card
Cube
Creating 3-D card objects is a good way to get started with 3-D transforms. But once you’ve mastered them, you’ll be hungry to push it further and create some true 3-D objects: prisms. We’ll start out by making a cube.
The markup for the cube is similar to the card. This time, however, we need six child elements for all six faces of the cube:
<section class="container">
<div id="cube">
<figure class="front">1</figure>
<figure class="back">2</figure>
<figure class="right">3</figure>
<figure class="left">4</figure>
<figure class="top">5</figure>
<figure class="bottom">6</figure>
</div>
</section>
Basic position and size styles set the six faces on top of one another in the container.
.container {
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
position: relative;
-webkit-perspective: 1000;
}
#cube {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
position: absolute;
-webkit-transform-style: preserve-3d;
}
#cube figure {
width: 196px;
height: 196px;
display: block;
position: absolute;
border: 2px solid black;
}
With the card, we only had to rotate its back face. The cube, however, requires that five of the six faces to be rotated. Faces 1 and 2 will be the front and back. Faces 3 and 4 will be the sides. Faces 5 and 6 will be the top and bottom.
#cube .front { -webkit-transform: rotateY(0deg); }
#cube .back { -webkit-transform: rotateX(180deg); }
#cube .right { -webkit-transform: rotateY(90deg); }
#cube .left { -webkit-transform: rotateY(-90deg); }
#cube .top { -webkit-transform: rotateX(90deg); }
#cube .bottom { -webkit-transform: rotateX(-90deg); }
We could remove the first #cube .front style declaration, as this transform has no effect, but let’s leave it in to keep our code consistent.
Now each face is rotated, and only the front face is visible. The four side faces are all perpendicular to the viewer, so they appear invisible. To push them out to their appropriate sides, they need to be translated out from the centre of their positions. Each side of the cube is 200 pixels wide. From the cube’s centre they’ll need to be translated out half that distance, 100px.
#cube .front { -webkit-transform: rotateY(0deg) translateZ(100px); }
#cube .back { -webkit-transform: rotateX(180deg) translateZ(100px); }
#cube .right { -webkit-transform: rotateY(90deg) translateZ(100px); }
#cube .left { -webkit-transform: rotateY(-90deg) translateZ(100px); }
#cube .top { -webkit-transform: rotateX(90deg) translateZ(100px); }
#cube .bottom { -webkit-transform: rotateX(-90deg) translateZ(100px); }
Note here that the translateZ function comes after the rotate. The order of transform functions is important. Take a moment and soak this up. Each face is first rotated towards its position, then translated outward in a separate vector.
We have a working cube, but we’re not done yet.
Returning to the Z-axis origin
For the sake of our users, our 3-D transforms should not distort the interface when the active panel is at its resting position. But once we start pushing elements off their Z-axis origin, distortion is inevitable.
In order to keep 3-D transforms snappy, Safari composites the element, then applies the transform. Consequently, anti-aliasing on text will remain whatever it was before the transform was applied. When transformed forward in 3-D space, significant pixelation can occur.
See Example: Transforms 2.
Looking back at the Perspective 3 demo, note that no matter how small the perspective value is, or wherever the transform-origin may be, the panel number 1 always returns to its original position, as if all those funky 3-D transforms didn’t even matter.
To resolve the distortion and restore pixel perfection to our #cube, we can push the 3-D object back, so that the front face will be positioned back to the Z-axis origin.
#cube { -webkit-transform: translateZ(-100px); }
See Example: Cube 1.
Restoring the front face to the original position on the Z-axis
Rotating the cube
To expose any face of the cube, we’ll need a style that rotates the cube to expose any face. The transform values are the opposite of those for the corresponding face. We toggle the necessary class on the #box to apply the appropriate transform.
#cube.show-front { -webkit-transform: translateZ(-100px) rotateY(0deg); }
#cube.show-back { -webkit-transform: translateZ(-100px) rotateX(-180deg); }
#cube.show-right { -webkit-transform: translateZ(-100px) rotateY(-90deg); }
#cube.show-left { -webkit-transform: translateZ(-100px) rotateY(90deg); }
#cube.show-top { -webkit-transform: translateZ(-100px) rotateX(-90deg); }
#cube.show-bottom { -webkit-transform: translateZ(-100px) rotateX(90deg); }
Notice how the order of the transform functions has reversed. First, we push the object back with translateZ, then we rotate it.
Finishing up, we can add a transition to animate the rotation between states.
#cube { -webkit-transition: -webkit-transform 1s; }
See Example: Cube 2.
Rotating the cube with a CSS transition
Rectangular prism
Cubes are easy enough to generate, as we only have to worry about one measurement. But how would we handle a non-regular rectangular prism? Let’s try to make one that’s 300 pixels wide, 200 pixels high, and 100 pixels deep.
The markup remains the same as the #cube, but we’ll switch the cube id for #box. The container styles remain mostly the same:
.container {
width: 300px;
height: 200px;
position: relative;
-webkit-perspective: 1000;
}
#box {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
position: absolute;
-webkit-transform-style: preserve-3d;
}
Now to position the faces. Each set of faces will need their own sizes. The smaller faces (left, right, top and bottom) need to be positioned in the centre of the container, where they can be easily rotated and then shifted outward. The thinner left and right faces get positioned left: 100px ((300 − 100) ÷ 2), The stouter top and bottom faces get positioned top: 50px ((200 − 100) ÷ 2).
#box figure {
display: block;
position: absolute;
border: 2px solid black;
}
#box .front,
#box .back {
width: 296px;
height: 196px;
}
#box .right,
#box .left {
width: 96px;
height: 196px;
left: 100px;
}
#box .top,
#box .bottom {
width: 296px;
height: 96px;
top: 50px;
}
The rotate values can all remain the same as the cube example, but for this rectangular prism, the translate values do differ. The front and back faces are each shifted out 50 pixels since the #box is 100 pixels deep. The translate value for the left and right faces is 150 pixels for their 300 pixels width. Top and bottom panels take 100 pixels for their 200 pixels height:
#box .front { -webkit-transform: rotateY(0deg) translateZ(50px); }
#box .back { -webkit-transform: rotateX(180deg) translateZ(50px); }
#box .right { -webkit-transform: rotateY(90deg) translateZ(150px); }
#box .left { -webkit-transform: rotateY(-90deg) translateZ(150px); }
#box .top { -webkit-transform: rotateX(90deg) translateZ(100px); }
#box .bottom { -webkit-transform: rotateX(-90deg) translateZ(100px); }
See Example: Box 1.
Just like the cube example, to expose a face, the #box needs to have a style to reverse that face’s transform. Both the translateZ and rotate values are the opposites of the corresponding face.
#box.show-front { -webkit-transform: translateZ(-50px) rotateY(0deg); }
#box.show-back { -webkit-transform: translateZ(-50px) rotateX(-180deg); }
#box.show-right { -webkit-transform: translateZ(-150px) rotateY(-90deg); }
#box.show-left { -webkit-transform: translateZ(-150px) rotateY(90deg); }
#box.show-top { -webkit-transform: translateZ(-100px) rotateX(-90deg); }
#box.show-bottom { -webkit-transform: translateZ(-100px) rotateX(90deg); }
See Example: Box 2.
Rotating the rectangular box with a CSS transition
Carousel
Front-end developers have a myriad of choices when it comes to content carousels. Now that we have 3-D capabilities in our browsers, why not take a shot at creating an actual 3-D carousel?
The markup for this demo takes the same form as the box, cube and card. Let’s make it interesting and have a carousel with nine panels.
<div class="container">
<div id="carousel">
<figure>1</figure>
<figure>2</figure>
<figure>3</figure>
<figure>4</figure>
<figure>5</figure>
<figure>6</figure>
<figure>7</figure>
<figure>8</figure>
<figure>9</figure>
</div>
</div>
Now, apply basic layout styles. Let’s give each panel of the #carousel 20 pixel gaps between one another, done here with left: 10px; and top: 10px;. The effective width of each panel is 210 pixels.
.container {
width: 210px;
height: 140px;
position: relative;
-webkit-perspective: 1000;
}
#carousel {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
position: absolute;
-webkit-transform-style: preserve-3d;
}
#carousel figure {
display: block;
position: absolute;
width: 186px;
height: 116px;
left: 10px;
top: 10px;
border: 2px solid black;
}
Next up: rotating the faces. This #carousel has nine panels. If each panel gets an equal distribution on the carousel, each panel would be rotated forty degrees from its neighbour (360 ÷ 9).
#carousel figure:nth-child(1) { -webkit-transform: rotateY(0deg); }
#carousel figure:nth-child(2) { -webkit-transform: rotateY(40deg); }
#carousel figure:nth-child(3) { -webkit-transform: rotateY(80deg); }
#carousel figure:nth-child(4) { -webkit-transform: rotateY(120deg); }
#carousel figure:nth-child(5) { -webkit-transform: rotateY(160deg); }
#carousel figure:nth-child(6) { -webkit-transform: rotateY(200deg); }
#carousel figure:nth-child(7) { -webkit-transform: rotateY(240deg); }
#carousel figure:nth-child(8) { -webkit-transform: rotateY(280deg); }
#carousel figure:nth-child(9) { -webkit-transform: rotateY(320deg); }
Now, the outward shift. Back when we were creating the cube and box, the translate value was simple to calculate, as it was equal to one half the width, height or depth of the object. With this carousel, there is no size we can automatically use as a reference. We’ll have to calculate the distance of the shift by other means.
Drawing a diagram of the carousel, we can see that we know only two things: the width of each panel is 210 pixels; and the each panel is rotated forty degrees from the next. If we split one of these segments down its centre, we get a right-angled triangle, perfect for some trigonometry.
We can determine the length of r in this diagram with a basic tangent equation:
There you have it: the panels need to be translated 288 pixels in 3-D space.
#carousel figure:nth-child(1) { -webkit-transform: rotateY(0deg) translateZ(288px); }
#carousel figure:nth-child(2) { -webkit-transform: rotateY(40deg) translateZ(288px); }
#carousel figure:nth-child(3) { -webkit-transform: rotateY(80deg) translateZ(288px); }
#carousel figure:nth-child(4) { -webkit-transform: rotateY(120deg) translateZ(288px); }
#carousel figure:nth-child(5) { -webkit-transform: rotateY(160deg) translateZ(288px); }
#carousel figure:nth-child(6) { -webkit-transform: rotateY(200deg) translateZ(288px); }
#carousel figure:nth-child(7) { -webkit-transform: rotateY(240deg) translateZ(288px); }
#carousel figure:nth-child(8) { -webkit-transform: rotateY(280deg) translateZ(288px); }
#carousel figure:nth-child(9) { -webkit-transform: rotateY(320deg) translateZ(288px); }
If we decide to change the width of the panel or the number of panels, we only need to plug in those two variables into our equation to get the appropriate translateZ value. In JavaScript terms, that equation would be:
var tz = Math.round( ( panelSize / 2 ) /
Math.tan( ( ( Math.PI * 2 ) / numberOfPanels ) / 2 ) );
// or simplified to
var tz = Math.round( ( panelSize / 2 ) /
Math.tan( Math.PI / numberOfPanels ) );
Just like our previous 3-D objects, to show any one panel we need only apply the reverse transform on the carousel. Here’s the style to show the fifth panel:
-webkit-transform: translateZ(-288px) rotateY(-160deg);
See Example: Carousel 1.
By now, you probably have two thoughts:
Rewriting transform styles for each panel looks tedious.
Why bother doing high school maths? Aren’t robots supposed to be doing all this work for us?
And you’re absolutely right. The repetitive nature of 3-D objects lends itself to scripting. We can offload all the monotonous transform styles to our dynamic script, which, if done correctly, will be more flexible than the hard-coded version.
See Example: Carousel 2.
Conclusion
3-D transforms change the way we think about the blank canvas of web design. Better yet, they change the canvas itself, trading in the flat surface for voluminous depth.
My hope is that you took at least one peak at a demo and were intrigued. We web designers, who have rejoiced for border-radius, box-shadow and background gradients, now have an incredible tool at our disposal in 3-D transforms. They deserve just the same enthusiasm, research and experimentation we have seen on other CSS3 features. Now is the perfect time to take the plunge and start thinking about how to use three dimensions to elevate our craft. I’m breathless waiting for what’s to come.
See you on the flip side. |
2010 |
David DeSandro |
daviddesandro |
2010-12-14T00:00:00+00:00 |
https://24ways.org/2010/intro-to-css-3d-transforms/ |
code |
| 235 |
Real Animation Using JavaScript, CSS3, and HTML5 Video |
When I was in school to be a 3-D animator, I read a book called Timing for Animation. Though only 152 pages long, it’s essentially the bible for anyone looking to be a great animator. In fact, Pixar chief creative officer John Lasseter used the first edition as a reference when he was an animator at Walt Disney Studios in the early 1980s.
In the book, authors John Halas and Harold Whitaker advise:
Timing is the part of animation which gives meaning to movement. Movement can easily be achieved by drawing the same thing in two different positions and inserting a number of other drawings between the two. The result on the screen will be movement; but it will not be animation.
But that’s exactly what we’re doing with CSS3 and JavaScript: we’re moving elements, not animating them. We’re constantly specifying beginning and end states and allowing the technology to interpolate between the two. And yet, it’s the nuances within those middle frames that create the sense of life we’re looking for.
As bandwidth increases and browser rendering grows more consistent, we can create interactions in different ways than we’ve been able to before. We’re encountering motion more and more on sites we’d generally label ‘static.’ However, this motion is mostly just movement, not animation. It’s the manipulation of an element’s properties, most commonly width, height, x- and y-coordinates, and opacity.
So how do we create real animation?
The metaphor
In my experience, animation is most believable when it simulates, exaggerates, or defies the real world. A bowling ball falls differently than a racquetball. They each have different weights and sizes, which affect the way they land, bounce, and impact other objects.
This is a major reason that JavaScript animation frequently feels mechanical; it doesn’t complete a metaphor. Expanding and collapsing a <div> feels very different than a opening a door or unfolding a piece of paper, but it often shouldn’t. The interaction itself should tie directly to the art direction of a page.
Physics
Understanding the physics of a situation is key to creating convincing animation, even if your animation seeks to defy conventional physics. Isaac Newton’s first law of motion’s_laws_of_motion states, “Every body remains in a state of rest or uniform motion (constant velocity) unless it is acted upon by an external unbalanced force.” Once a force acts upon an object, the object’s shape can change accordingly, depending on the strength of the force and the mass of the object. Another nugget of wisdom from Halas and Whitaker:
All objects in nature have their own weight, construction, and degree of flexibility, and therefore each behaves in its own individual way when a force acts upon it. This behavior, a combination of position and timing, is the basis of animation. The basic question which an animator is continually asking himself is this: “What will happen to this object when a force acts upon it?” And the success of his animation largely depends on how well he answers this question.
In animating with CSS3 and JavaScript, keep physics in mind. How ‘heavy’ is the element you’re interacting with? What kind of force created the action? A gentle nudge? A forceful shove? These subtleties will add a sense of realism to your animations and make them much more believable to your users.
Misdirection
Magicians often use misdirection to get their audience to focus on one thing rather than another. They fool us into thinking something happened that actually didn’t.
Animation is the same, especially on a screen. By changing the arrangement of pixels on screen at a fast enough rate, your eyes fool your mind into thinking an object is actually in motion.
Another important component of misdirecting in animation is the use of multiple objects. Try to recall a cartoon where a character vanishes. More often, the character makes some sort of exaggerated motion (this is called anticipation) then disappears, and a puff a smoke follows. That smoke is an extra element, but it goes a long way into make you believe that character actually disappeared.
Very rarely does a vanishing character’s opacity simply go from one hundred per cent to zero. That’s not believable. So why do we do it with <div>s?
Armed with the ammunition of metaphors and misdirection, let’s code an example.
Shake, rattle, and roll
(These demos require at least a basic understanding of jQuery and CSS3. Run away if your’re afraid, or brush up on CSS animation and resources for learning jQuery. Also, these demos use WebKit-specific features and are best viewed in the latest version of Safari, so performance in other browsers may vary.)
We often see the design pattern of clicking a link to reveal content. Our “first demo”:”/examples/2010/real-animation/demo1/ shows us exactly that. It uses jQuery’s “ slideDown()”:http://api.jquery.com/slideDown/ method, as many instances do.
But what force acted on the <div> that caused it to open? Did pressing the button unlatch some imaginary hook? Did it activate an unlocking sequence with some gears?
Take 2
Our second demo is more explicit about what happens: the button fell on the <div> and shook its content loose. Here’s how it’s done.
function clickHandler(){
$('#button').addClass('animate');
return false;
}
Clicking the link adds a class of animate to our button. That class has the following CSS associated with it:
<style>
.animate {
-webkit-animation-name: ANIMATE;
-webkit-animation-duration: 0.25s;
-webkit-animation-iteration-count: 1;
-webkit-animation-timing-function: ease-in;
}
@-webkit-keyframes ANIMATE {
from {
top: 72px;
}
to {
top: 112px;
}
}
</style>
In our keyframe definition, we’ve specified from and to states. This is great, because we can be explicit about how an object starts and finishes moving.
What’s also extra handy is that these CSS keyframes broadcast events that you can react to with JavaScript. In this example, we’re listening to the webkitAnimationEnd event and opening the <div> only when the sequence is complete. Here’s that code.
function attachAnimationEventHandlers(){
var wrap = document.getElementById('wrap');
wrap.addEventListener('webkitAnimationEnd', function($e) {
switch($e.animationName){
case "ANIMATE" :
openMain();
break;
default:
}
}, false);
}
function openMain(){
$('#main .inner').slideDown('slow');
}
(For more info on handling animation events, check out the documentation at the Safari Reference Library.)
Take 3
The problem with the previous demo is that the subtleties of timing aren’t evident. It still feels a bit choppy.
For our third demo, we’ll use percentages instead of keywords so that we can insert as many points as we need to communicate more realistic timing. The percentages allow us to add the keys to well-timed animation: anticipation, hold, release, and reaction.
<style>
@-webkit-keyframes ANIMATE {
0% {
top: 72px;
}
40% { /* anticipation */
top: 57px;
}
70% { /* hold */
top: 56px;
}
80% { /* release */
top: 112px;
}
100% { /* return */
top: 72px;
}
}
</style>
Take 4
The button animation is starting to feel much better, but the reaction of the <div> opening seems a bit slow.
This fourth demo uses jQuery’s delay() method to time the opening precisely when we want it. Since we know the button’s animation is one second long and its reaction starts at eighty per cent of that, that puts our delay at 800ms (eighty per cent of one second). However, here’s a little pro tip: let’s start the opening at 750ms instead. The extra fifty milliseconds makes it feel more like the opening is a reaction to the exact hit of the button. Instead of listening for the webkitAnimationEnd event, we can start the opening as soon as the button is clicked, and the movement plays on the specified delay.
function clickHandler(){
$('#button').addClass('animate');
openMain();
return false;
}
function openMain(){
$('#main .inner').delay(750).slideDown('slow');
}
Take 5
We can tweak the timing of that previous animation forever, but that’s probably as close as we’re going to get to realistic animation with CSS and JavaScript. However, for some extra sauce, we could relegate the whole animation in our final demo to a video sequence which includes more nuances and extra elements for misdirection.
Here’s the basis of video replacement. Add a <video> element to the page and adjust its opacity to zero. Once the button is clicked, fade the button out and start playing the video. Once the video is finished playing, fade it out and bring the button back.
function clickHandler(){
if($('#main .inner').is(':hidden')){
$('#button').fadeTo(100, 0);
$('#clickVideo').fadeTo(100, 1, function(){
var clickVideo = document.getElementById('clickVideo');
clickVideo.play();
setTimeout(removeVideo, 2400);
openMain();
});
}
return false;
}
function removeVideo(){
$('#button').fadeTo(500, 1);
$('#clickVideo').fadeOut('slow');
}
function openMain(){
$('#main .inner').delay(1100).slideDown('slow');
}
Wrapping up
I’m no JavaScript expert by any stretch. I’m sure a lot of you scripting wizards out there could write much cleaner and more efficient code, but I hope this gives you an idea of the theory behind more realistic motion with the technology we’re using most. This is just one model of creating more convincing animation, but you can create countless variations of this, including…
Exporting <video> animations in 3-D animation tools or 2-D animation tools like Flash or After Effects
Using <canvas> or SVG instead of <video>
Employing specific JavaScript animation frameworks
Making use of all the powerful properties of CSS Transforms and CSS Animation
Trying out emerging CSS3 animation tools like Sencha Animator
If it wasn’t already apparent, these demos show an exaggerated example and probably aren’t practical in a lot of environments. However, there are a handful of great sites out there that honor animation techniques—metaphor, physics, and misdirection, among others—like Benjamin De Cock’s vCard, 20 Things I Learned About Browsers and the Web by Fantasy Interactive, and the Nike Snowboarding site by Ian Coyle and HEGA. They’re wonderful testaments to what you can do to aid interaction for users.
My goal was to show you the ‘why’ and the ‘how.’ Your charge is to discern the ‘where’ and the ‘when.’ Happy animating! |
2010 |
Dan Mall |
danmall |
2010-12-15T00:00:00+00:00 |
https://24ways.org/2010/real-animation-using-javascript-css3-and-html5-video/ |
code |
| 238 |
Everything You Wanted To Know About Gradients (And a Few Things You Didn’t) |
Hello. I am here to discuss CSS3 gradients. Because, let’s face it, what the web really needed was more gradients.
Still, despite their widespread use (or is it overuse?), the smartly applied gradient can be a valuable contributor to a designer’s vocabulary. There’s always been a tension between the inherently two-dimensional nature of our medium, and our desire for more intensity, more depth in our designs. And a gradient can evoke so much: the splay of light across your desk, the slow decrease in volume toward the end of your favorite song, the sunset after a long day. When properly applied, graded colors bring a much needed softness to our work.
Of course, that whole ‘proper application’ thing is the tricky bit.
But given their place in our toolkit and their prominence online, it really is heartening to see we can create gradients directly with CSS. They’re part of the draft images module, and implemented in two of the major rendering engines.
Still, I’ve always found CSS gradients to be one of the more confusing aspects of CSS3. So if you’ll indulge me, let’s take a quick look at how to create CSS gradients—hopefully we can make them seem a bit more accessible, and bring a bit more art into the browser.
Gradient theory 101 (I hope that’s not really a thing)
Right. So before we dive into the code, let’s cover a few basics. Every gradient, no matter how complex, shares a few common characteristics. Here’s a straightforward one:
I spent seconds hours designing this gradient. I hope you like it.
At either end of our image, we have a final color value, or color stop: on the left, our stop is white; on the right, black. And more color-rich gradients are no different:
(Don’t ever really do this. Please. I beg you.)
It’s visually more intricate, sure. But at the heart of it, we have just seven color stops (red, orange, yellow, and so on), making for a fantastic gradient all the way.
Now, color stops alone do not a gradient make. Between each is a transition point, the fail-over point between the two stops. Now, the transition point doesn’t need to fall exactly between stops: it can be brought closer to one stop or the other, influencing the overall shape of the gradient.
A tale of two syntaxes
Armed with our new vocabulary, let’s look at a CSS gradient in the wild. Behold, the simple input button:
There’s a simple linear gradient applied vertically across the button, moving from a bright sunflowerish hue (#FAA51A, for you hex nuts in the audience) to a much richer orange (#F47A20). And here’s the CSS that makes it happen:
input[type=submit] {
background-color: #F47A20;
background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(
#FAA51A,
#F47A20
);
background-image: -webkit-gradient(linear, 0 0, 0 100%,
color-stop(0, #FAA51A),
color-stop(1, #F47A20)
);
}
I’ve borrowed David DeSandro’s most excellent formatting suggestions for gradients to make this snippet a bit more legible but, still, the code above might have turned your stomach a bit. And that’s perfectly understandable—heck, it sort of turned mine. But let’s step through the CSS slowly, and see if we can’t make it a little less terrifying.
Verbose WebKit is verbose
Here’s the syntax for our little gradient on WebKit:
background-image: -webkit-gradient(linear, 0 0, 0 100%,
color-stop(0, #FAA51A),
color-stop(1, #F47A20)
);
Woof. Quite a mouthful, no? Well, here’s what we’re looking at:
WebKit has a single -webkit-gradient property, which can be used to create either linear or radial gradients.
The next two values are the starting and ending positions for our gradient (0 0 and 0 100%, respectively). Linear gradients are simply drawn along the path between those two points, which allows us to change the direction of our gradient simply by altering its start and end points.
Afterward, we specify our color stops with the oh-so-aptly named color-stop parameter, which takes the stop’s position on the gradient (0 being the beginning, and 100% or 1 being the end) and the color itself.
For a simple two-color gradient like this, -webkit-gradient has a bit of shorthand notation to offer us:
background-image: -webkit-gradient(linear, 0 0, 0 100%,
from(#FAA51A),
to(#FAA51A)
);
from(#FAA51A) is equivalent to writing color-stop(0, #FAA51A), and to(#FAA51A) is the same as color-stop(1, #FAA51A) or color-stop(100%, #FAA51A)—in both cases, we’re simply declaring the first and last color stops in our gradient.
Terse Gecko is terse
WebKit proposed its syntax back in 2008, heavily inspired by the way gradients are drawn in the canvas specification. However, a different, leaner syntax came to the fore, eventually appearing in a draft module specification in CSS3.
Naturally, because nothing on the web was meant to be easy, this is the one that Mozilla has implemented.
Here’s how we get gradient-y in Gecko:
background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(
#FAA51A,
#F47A20
);
Wait, what? Done already? That’s right. By default, -moz-linear-gradient assumes you’re trying to create a vertical gradient, starting from the top of your element and moving to the bottom. And, if that’s the case, then you simply need to specify your color stops, delimited with a few commas.
I know: that was almost… painless. But the W3C/Mozilla syntax also affords us a fair amount of flexibility and control, by introducing features as we need them.
We can specify an origin point for our gradient:
background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(50% 100%,
#FAA51A,
#F47A20
);
As well as an angle, to give it a direction:
background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(50% 100%, 45deg,
#FAA51A,
#F47A20
);
And we can specify multiple stops, simply by adding to our comma-delimited list:
background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(50% 100%, 45deg,
#FAA51A,
#FCC,
#F47A20
);
By adding a percentage after a given color value, we can determine its position along the gradient path:
background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(50% 100%, 45deg,
#FAA51A,
#FCC 20%,
#F47A20
);
So that’s some of the flexibility implicit in the W3C/Mozilla-style syntax.
Now, I should note that both syntaxes have their respective fans. I will say that the W3C/Mozilla-style syntax makes much more sense to me, and lines up with how I think about creating gradients. But I can totally understand why some might prefer WebKit’s more verbose approach to the, well, looseness behind the -moz syntax. À chacun son gradient syntax.
Still, as the language gets refined by the W3C, I really hope some consensus is reached by the browser vendors. And with Opera signaling that it will support the W3C syntax, I suppose it falls on WebKit to do the same.
Reusing color stops for fun and profit
But CSS gradients aren’t all simple colors and shapes and whatnot: by getting inventive with individual color stops, you can create some really complex, compelling effects.
Tim Van Damme, whose brain, I believe, should be posthumously donated to science, has a particularly clever application of gradients on The Box, a site dedicated to his occasional podcast series. Now, there are a fair number of gradients applied throughout the UI, but it’s the feature image that really catches the eye.
You see, there’s nothing that says you can’t reuse color stops. And Tim’s exploited that perfectly.
He’s created a linear gradient, angled at forty-five degrees from the top left corner of the photo, starting with a fully transparent white (rgba(255, 255, 255, 0)). At the halfway mark, he’s established another color stop at an only slightly more opaque white (rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1)), making for that incredibly gradual brightening toward the middle of the photo.
But then he has set another color stop immediately on top of it, bringing it back down to rgba(255, 255, 255, 0) again. This creates that fantastically hard edge that diagonally bisects the photo, giving the image that subtle gloss.
And his final color stop ends at the same fully transparent white, completing the effect. Hot? I do believe so.
Rocking the radials
We’ve been looking at linear gradients pretty exclusively. But I’d be remiss if I didn’t at least mention radial gradients as a viable option, including a modest one as a link accent on a navigation bar:
And here’s the relevant CSS:
background: -moz-radial-gradient(50% 100%, farthest-side,
rgb(204, 255, 255) 1%,
rgb(85, 85, 85) 15%,
rgba(85, 85, 85, 0)
);
background: -webkit-gradient(radial, 50% 100%, 0, 50% 100%, 15,
from(rgb(204, 255, 255)),
to(rgba(85, 85, 85, 0))
);
Now, the syntax builds on what we’ve already learned about linear gradients, so much of it might be familiar to you, picking out color stops and transition points, as well as the two syntaxes’ reliance on either a separate property (-moz-radial-gradient) or parameter (-webkit-gradient(radial, …)) to shift into circular mode.
Mozilla introduces another stand-alone property (-moz-radial-gradient), and accepts a starting point (50% 100%) from which the circle radiates. There’s also a size constant defined (farthest-side), which determines the reach and shape of our gradient.
WebKit is again the more verbose of the two syntaxes, requiring both starting and ending points (50% 100% in both cases). Each also accepts a radius in pixels, allowing you to control the skew and breadth of the circle.
Again, this is a fairly modest little radial gradient. Time and article length (and, let’s be honest, your author’s completely inadequate grasp of geometry) prevent me from covering radial gradients in much more detail, because they are incredibly powerful. For those interested in learning more, I can’t recommend the references at Mozilla and Apple strongly enough.
Leave no browser behind
But no matter the kind of gradients you’re working with, there is a large swathe of browsers that simply don’t support gradients. Thankfully, it’s fairly easy to declare a sensible fallback—it just depends on the kind of fallback you’d like. Essentially, gradient-blind browsers will disregard any properties containing references to either -moz-linear-gradient, -moz-radial-gradient, or -webkit-gradient, so you simply need to keep your fallback isolated from those properties.
For example: if you’d like to fall back to a flat color, simply declare a separate background-color:
.nav {
background-color: #000;
background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(rgba(0, 0, 0, 0), rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.45));
background-image: -webkit-gradient(linear, 0 0, 0 100%, from(rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)), to(rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.45)));
}
Or perhaps just create three separate background properties.
.nav {
background: #000;
background: #000 -moz-linear-gradient(rgba(0, 0, 0, 0), rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.45));
background: #000 -webkit-gradient(linear, 0 0, 0 100%, from(rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)), to(rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.45)));
}
We can even build on this to fall back to a non-gradient image:
.nav {
background: #000 <strong>url("faux-gradient-lol.png") repeat-x</strong>;
background: #000 -moz-linear-gradient(rgba(0, 0, 0, 0), rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.45));
background: #000 -webkit-gradient(linear, 0 0, 0 100%, from(rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)), to(rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.45)));
}
No matter the approach you feel most appropriate to your design, it’s really just a matter of keeping your fallback design quarantined from its CSS3-ified siblings.
(If you’re feeling especially masochistic, there’s even a way to get simple linear gradients working in IE via Microsoft’s proprietary filters. Of course, those come with considerable performance penalties that even Microsoft is quick to point out, so I’d recommend avoiding those.
And don’t tell Andy Clarke I told you, or he’ll probably unload his Derringer at me. Or something.)
Go forth and, um, gradientify!
It’s entirely possible your head’s spinning. Heck, mine is, but that might be the effects of the ’nog. But maybe you’re wondering why you should care about CSS gradients. After all, images are here right now, and work just fine.
Well, there are some quick benefits that spring to mind: fewer HTTP requests are needed; CSS3 gradients are easily made scalable, making them ideal for variable widths and heights; and finally, they’re easily modifiable by tweaking a few CSS properties. Because, let’s face it, less time spent yelling at Photoshop is a very, very good thing.
Of course, CSS-generated gradients are not without their drawbacks. The syntax can be confusing, and it’s still under development at the W3C. As we’ve seen, browser support is still very much in flux. And it’s possible that gradients themselves have some real performance drawbacks—so test thoroughly, and gradient carefully.
But still, as syntaxes converge, and support improves, I think generated gradients can make a compelling tool in our collective belts. The tasteful design is, of course, entirely up to you.
So have fun, and get gradientin’. |
2010 |
Ethan Marcotte |
ethanmarcotte |
2010-12-22T00:00:00+00:00 |
https://24ways.org/2010/everything-you-wanted-to-know-about-gradients/ |
code |
| 239 |
Using the WebFont Loader to Make Browsers Behave the Same |
Web fonts give us designers a whole new typographic palette with which to work. However, browsers handle the loading of web fonts in different ways, and this can lead to inconsistent user experiences.
Safari, Chrome and Internet Explorer leave a blank space in place of the styled text while the web font is loading. Opera and Firefox show text with the default font which switches over when the web font has loaded, resulting in the so-called Flash of Unstyled Text (aka FOUT). Some people prefer Safari’s approach as it eliminates FOUT, others think the Firefox way is more appropriate as content can be read whilst fonts download. Whatever your preference, the WebFont Loader can make all browsers behave the same way.
The WebFont Loader is a JavaScript library that gives you extra control over font loading. It was co-developed by Google and Typekit, and released as open source. The WebFont Loader works with most web font services as well as with self-hosted fonts.
The WebFont Loader tells you when the following events happen as a browser downloads web fonts (or loads them from cache):
when fonts start to download (‘loading’)
when fonts finish loading (‘active’)
if fonts fail to load (‘inactive’)
If your web page requires more than one font, the WebFont Loader will trigger events for individual fonts, and for all the fonts as a whole. This means you can find out when any single font has loaded, and when all the fonts have loaded (or failed to do so).
The WebFont Loader notifies you of these events in two ways: by applying special CSS classes when each event happens; and by firing JavaScript events. For our purposes, we’ll be using just the CSS classes.
Implementing the WebFont Loader
As stated above, the WebFont Loader works with most web font services as well as with self-hosted fonts.
Self-hosted fonts
To use the WebFont Loader when you are hosting the font files on your own server, paste the following code into your web page:
<script type="text/javascript">
WebFontConfig = {
custom: { families: ['Font Family Name', 'Another Font Family'],
urls: [ 'http://yourwebsite.com/styles.css' ] }
};
(function() {
var wf = document.createElement('script');
wf.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https' : 'http') + '://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/webfont/1/webfont.js';
wf.type = 'text/javascript';
wf.async = 'true';
var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(wf, s);
})();
</script>
Replace Font Family Name and Another Font Family with a comma-separated list of the font families you want to check against, and replace http://yourwebsite.com/styles.css with the URL of the style sheet where your @font-face rules reside.
Fontdeck
Assuming you have added some fonts to a website project in Fontdeck, use the afore-mentioned code for self-hosted solutions and replace http://yourwebsite.com/styles.css with the URL of the <link> tag in your Fontdeck website settings page. It will look something like http://f.fontdeck.com/s/css/xxxx/domain/nnnn.css.
Typekit
Typekit’s JavaScript-based implementation incorporates the WebFont Loader events by default, so you won’t need to include any WebFont Loader code.
Making all browsers behave like Safari
To make Firefox and Opera work in the same way as WebKit browsers (Safari, Chrome, etc.) and Internet Explorer, and thus minimise FOUT, you need to hide the text while the fonts are loading.
While fonts are loading, the WebFont Loader adds a class of wf-loading to the <html> element. Once the fonts have loaded, the wf-loading class is removed and replaced with a class of wf-active (or wf-inactive if all of the fonts failed to load). This means you can style elements on the page while the fonts are loading and then style them differently when the fonts have finished loading.
So, let’s say the text you need to hide while fonts are loading is contained in all paragraphs and top-level headings. By writing the following style rule into your CSS, you can hide the text while the fonts are loading:
.wf-loading h1, .wf-loading p {
visibility:hidden;
}
Because the wf-loading class is removed once the the fonts have loaded, the visibility:hidden rule will stop being applied, and the text revealed. You can see this in action on this simple example page.
That works nicely across the board, but the situation is slightly more complicated. WebKit doesn’t wait for all fonts to load before displaying text: it displays text elements as soon as the relevant font is loaded.
To emulate WebKit more accurately, we need to know when individual fonts have loaded, and apply styles accordingly. Fortunately, as mentioned earlier, the WebFont Loader has events for individual fonts too.
When a specific font is loading, a class of the form wf-fontfamilyname-n4-loading is applied. Assuming headings and paragraphs are styled in different fonts, we can make our CSS more specific as follows:
.wf-fontfamilyname-n4-loading h1,
.wf-anotherfontfamily-n4-loading p {
visibility:hidden;
}
Note that the font family name is transformed to lower case, with all spaces removed. The n4 is a shorthand for the weight and style of the font family. In most circumstances you’ll use n4 but refer to the WebFont Loader documentation for exceptions.
You can see it in action on this Safari example page (you’ll probably need to disable your cache to see any change occur).
Making all browsers behave like Firefox
To make WebKit browsers and Internet Explorer work like Firefox and Opera, you need to explicitly show text while the fonts are loading. In order to make this happen, you need to specify a font family which is not a web font while the fonts load, like this:
.wf-fontfamilyname-n4-loading h1 {
font-family: 'arial narrow', sans-serif;
}
.wf-anotherfontfamily-n4-loading p {
font-family: arial, sans-serif;
}
You can see this in action on the Firefox example page (again you’ll probably need to disable your cache to see any change occur).
And there’s more
That’s just the start of what can be done with the WebFont Loader. More areas to explore would be tweaking font sizes to reduce the impact of reflowing text and to better cater for very narrow fonts. By using the JavaScript events much more can be achieved too, such as fading in text as the fonts load. |
2010 |
Richard Rutter |
richardrutter |
2010-12-02T00:00:00+00:00 |
https://24ways.org/2010/using-the-webfont-loader-to-make-browsers-behave-the-same/ |
code |
| 240 |
My CSS Wish List |
I love Christmas. I love walking around the streets of London, looking at the beautifully decorated windows, seeing the shiny lights that hang above Oxford Street and listening to Christmas songs.
I’m not going to lie though. Not only do I like buying presents, I love receiving them too. I remember making long lists that I would send to Father Christmas with all of the Lego sets I wanted to get. I knew I could only get one a year, but I would spend days writing the perfect list.
The years have gone by, but I still enjoy making wish lists. And I’ll tell you a little secret: my mum still asks me to send her my Christmas list every year.
This time I’ve made my CSS wish list. As before, I’d be happy with just one present.
Before I begin…
… this list includes:
things that don’t exist in the CSS specification (if they do, please let me know in the comments – I may have missed them);
others that are in the spec, but it’s incomplete or lacks use cases and examples (which usually means that properties haven’t been implemented by even the most recent browsers).
Like with any other wish list, the further down I go, the more unrealistic my expectations – but that doesn’t mean I can’t wish. Some of the things we wouldn’t have thought possible a few years ago have been implemented and our wishes fulfilled (think multiple backgrounds, gradients and transformations, for example).
The list
Cross-browser implementation of font-size-adjust
When one of the fall-back fonts from your font stack is used, rather than the preferred (first) one, you can retain the aspect ratio by using this very useful property. It is incredibly helpful when the fall-back fonts are smaller or larger than the initial one, which can make layouts look less polished.
What font-size-adjust does is divide the original font-size of the fall-back fonts by the font-size-adjust value. This preserves the x-height of the preferred font in the fall-back fonts. Here’s a simple example:
p {
font-family: Calibri, "Lucida Sans", Verdana, sans-serif;
font-size-adjust: 0.47;
}
In this case, if the user doesn’t have Calibri installed, both Lucida Sans and Verdana will keep Calibri’s aspect ratio, based on the font’s x-height. This property is a personal favourite and one I keep pointing to.
Firefox supported this property from version three. So far, it’s the only browser that does. Fontdeck provides the font-size-adjust value along with its fonts, and has a handy tool for calculating it.
More control over overflowing text
The text-overflow property lets you control text that overflows its container. The most common use for it is to show an ellipsis to indicate that there is more text than what is shown. To be able to use it, the container should have overflow set to something other than visible, and white-space: nowrap:
div {
white-space: nowrap;
width: 100%;
overflow: hidden;
text-overflow: ellipsis;
}
This, however, only works for blocks of text on a single line. In the wish list of many CSS authors (and in mine) is a way of defining text-overflow: ellipsis on a block of multiple text lines. Opera has taken the first step and added support for the -o-ellipsis-lastline property, which can be used instead of ellipsis. This property is not part of the CSS3 spec, but we could certainly make good use of it if it were…
WebKit has -webkit-line-clamp to specify how many lines to show before cutting with an ellipsis, but support is patchy at best and there is no control over where the ellipsis shows in the text. Many people have spent time wrangling JavaScript to do this for us, but the methods used are very processor intensive, and introduce a JavaScript dependency.
Indentation and hanging punctuation properties
You might notice a trend here: almost half of the items in this list relate to typography. The lack of fine-grained control over typographical detail is a general concern among designers and CSS authors. Indentation and hanging punctuation fall into this category.
The CSS3 specification introduces two new possible values for the text-indent property: each-line; and hanging. each-line would indent the first line of the block container and each line after a forced line break; hanging would invert which lines are affected by the indentation.
The proposed hanging-punctuation property would allow us to specify whether opening and closing brackets and quotes should hang outside the edge of the first and last lines. The specification is still incomplete, though, and asks for more examples and use cases.
Text alignment and hyphenation properties
Following the typographic trend of this list, I’d like to add better control over text alignment and hyphenation properties. The CSS3 module on Generated Content for Paged Media already specifies five new hyphenation-related properties (namely: hyphenate-dictionary; hyphenate-before and hyphenate-after; hyphenate-lines; and hyphenate-character), but it is still being developed and lacks examples.
In the text alignment realm, the new text-align-last property allows you to define how the last line of a block (or a line just before a forced break) is aligned, if your text is set to justify. Its value can be: start; end; left; right; center; and justify. The text-justify property should also allow you to have more control over text set to text-align: justify but, for now, only Internet Explorer supports this.
calc()
This is probably my favourite item in the list: the calc() function. This function is part of the CSS3 Values and Units module, but it has only been implemented by Firefox (4.0). To take advantage of it now you need to use the Mozilla vendor code, -moz-calc().
Imagine you have a fluid two-column layout where the sidebar column has a fixed width of 240 pixels, and the main content area fills the rest of the width available. This is how you could create that using -moz-calc():
#main {
width: -moz-calc(100% - 240px);
}
Can you imagine how many hacks and headaches we could avoid were this function available in more browsers? Transitions and animations are really nice and lovely but, for me, it’s the ability to do the things that calc() allows you to that deserves the spotlight and to be pushed for implementation.
Selector grouping with -moz-any()
The -moz-any() selector grouping has been introduced by Mozilla but it’s not part of any CSS specification (yet?); it’s currently only available on Firefox 4.
This would be especially useful with the way HTML5 outlines documents, where we can have any number of variations of several levels of headings within numerous types of containers (think sections within articles within sections…).
Here is a quick example (copied from the Mozilla blog post about the article) of how -moz-any() works. Instead of writing:
section section h1, section article h1, section aside h1,
section nav h1, article section h1, article article h1,
article aside h1, article nav h1, aside section h1,
aside article h1, aside aside h1, aside nav h1, nav section h1,
nav article h1, nav aside h1, nav nav h1, {
font-size: 24px;
}
You could simply write:
-moz-any(section, article, aside, nav)
-moz-any(section, article, aside, nav) h1 {
font-size: 24px;
}
Nice, huh?
More control over styling form elements
Some are of the opinion that form elements shouldn’t be styled at all, since a user might not recognise them as such if they don’t match the operating system’s controls. I partially agree: I’d rather put the choice in the hands of designers and expect them to be capable of deciding whether their particular design hampers or improves usability.
I would say the same idea applies to font-face: while some fear designers might go crazy and litter their web pages with dozens of different fonts, most welcome the freedom to use something other than Arial or Verdana.
There will always be someone who will take this freedom too far, but it would be useful if we could, for example, style the default Opera date picker:
<input type="date" />
or Safari’s slider control (think star movie ratings, for example):
<input type="range" min="0" max="5" step="1" value="3" />
Parent selector
I don’t think there is one CSS author out there who has never come across a case where he or she wished there was a parent selector. There have been many suggestions as to how this could work, but a variation of the child selector is usually the most popular:
article < h1 {
…
}
One can dream…
Flexible box layout
The Flexible Box Layout Module sounds a bit like magic: it introduces a new box model to CSS, allowing you to distribute and order boxes inside other boxes, and determine how the available space is shared.
Two of my favourite features of this new box model are:
the ability to redistribute boxes in a different order from the markup
the ability to create flexible layouts, where boxes shrink (or expand) to fill the available space
Let’s take a quick look at the second case. Imagine you have a three-column layout, where the first column takes up twice as much horizontal space as the other two:
<body>
<section id="main">
</section>
<section id="links">
</section>
<aside>
</aside>
</body>
With the flexible box model, you could specify it like this:
body {
display: box;
box-orient: horizontal;
}
#main {
box-flex: 2;
}
#links {
box-flex: 1;
}
aside {
box-flex: 1;
}
If you decide to add a fourth column to this layout, there is no need to recalculate units or percentages, it’s as easy as that.
Browser support for this property is still in its early stages (Firefox and WebKit need their vendor prefixes), but we should start to see it being gradually introduced as more attention is drawn to it (I’m looking at you…). You can read a more comprehensive write-up about this property on the Mozilla developer blog.
It’s easy to understand why it’s harder to start playing with this module than with things like animations or other more decorative properties, which don’t really break your layouts when users don’t see them. But it’s important that we do, even if only in very experimental projects.
Nested selectors
Anyone who has never wished they could do something like the following in CSS, cast the first stone:
article {
h1 { font-size: 1.2em; }
ul { margin-bottom: 1.2em; }
}
Even though it can easily turn into a specificity nightmare and promote redundancy in your style sheets (if you abuse it), it’s easy to see how nested selectors could be useful. CSS compilers such as Less or Sass let you do this already, but not everyone wants or can use these compilers in their projects.
Every wish list has an item that could easily be dropped. In my case, I would say this is one that I would ditch first – it’s the least useful, and also the one that could cause more maintenance problems. But it could be nice.
Implementation of the ::marker pseudo-element
The CSS Lists module introduces the ::marker pseudo-element, that allows you to create custom list item markers. When an element’s display property is set to list-item, this pseudo-element is created.
Using the ::marker pseudo-element you could create something like the following:
Footnote 1: Both John Locke and his father, Anthony Cooper, are
named after 17th- and 18th-century English philosophers; the real
Anthony Cooper was educated as a boy by the real John Locke.
Footnote 2: Parts of the plane were used as percussion instruments
and can be heard in the soundtrack.
where the footnote marker is generated by the following CSS:
li::marker {
content: "Footnote " counter(notes) ":";
text-align: left;
width: 12em;
}
li {
counter-increment: notes;
}
You can read more about how to use counters in CSS in my article from last year.
Bear in mind that the CSS Lists module is still a Working Draft and is listed as “Low priority”. I did say this wish list would start to grow more unrealistic closer to the end…
Variables
The sight of the word ‘variables’ may make some web designers shy away, but when you think of them applied to things such as repeated colours in your stylesheets, it’s easy to see how having variables available in CSS could be useful.
Think of a website where the main brand colour is applied to elements like the main text, headings, section backgrounds, borders, and so on. In a particularly large website, where the colour is repeated countless times in the CSS and where it’s important to keep the colour consistent, using variables would be ideal (some big websites are already doing this by using server-side technology).
Again, Less and Sass allow you to use variables in your CSS but, again, not everyone can (or wants to) use these.
If you are using Less, you could, for instance, set the font-family value in one variable, and simply call that variable later in the code, instead of repeating the complete font stack, like so:
@fontFamily: Calibri, "Lucida Grande", "Lucida Sans Unicode", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;
body {
font-family: @fontFamily;
}
Other features of these CSS compilers might also be useful, like the ability to ‘call’ a property value from another selector (accessors):
header {
background: #000000;
}
footer {
background: header['background'];
}
or the ability to define functions (with arguments), saving you from writing large blocks of code when you need to write something like, for example, a CSS gradient:
.gradient (@start:"", @end:"") {
background: -webkit-gradient(linear, left top, left bottom, from(@start), to(@end));
background: -moz-linear-gradient(-90deg,@start,@end);
}
button {
.gradient(#D0D0D0,#9F9F9F);
}
Standardised comments
Each CSS author has his or her own style for commenting their style sheets. While this isn’t a massive problem on smaller projects, where maybe only one person will edit the CSS, in larger scale projects, where dozens of hands touch the code, it would be nice to start seeing a more standardised way of commenting.
One attempt at creating a standard for CSS comments is CSSDOC, an adaptation of Javadoc (a documentation generator that extracts comments from Java source code into HTML). CSSDOC uses ‘DocBlocks’, a term borrowed from the phpDocumentor Project. A DocBlock is a human- and machine-readable block of data which has the following structure:
/**
* Short description
*
* Long description (this can have multiple lines and contain <p> tags
*
* @tags (optional)
*/
CSSDOC includes a standard for documenting bug fixes and hacks, colours, versioning and copyright information, amongst other important bits of data.
I know this isn’t a CSS feature request per se; rather, it’s just me pointing you at something that is usually overlooked but that could contribute towards keeping style sheets easier to maintain and to hand over to new developers.
Final notes
I understand that if even some of these were implemented in browsers now, it would be a long time until all vendors were up to speed. But if we don’t talk about them and experiment with what’s available, then it will definitely never happen.
Why haven’t I mentioned better browser support for existing CSS3 properties? Because that would be the same as adding chocolate to your Christmas wish list – you don’t need to ask, everyone knows you want it.
The list could go on. There are dozens of other things I would love to see integrated in CSS or further developed. These are my personal favourites: some might be less useful than others, but I’ve wished for all of them at some point.
Part of the research I did while writing this article was asking some friends what they would add to their lists; other than a couple of items I already had in mine, everything else was different. I’m sure your list would be different too. So tell me, what’s on your CSS wish list? |
2010 |
Inayaili de León Persson |
inayailideleon |
2010-12-03T00:00:00+00:00 |
https://24ways.org/2010/my-css-wish-list/ |
code |